#1 ·
I was thinking about this today while watching some old clips of classic tournaments. There used to be this sense of "sacred ground" with certain traditions—you knew exactly what the vibe was going to be, the atmosphere was specific, and it felt almost untouched by the outside world.
Lately, it feels like every major institution is undergoing this massive pivot to stay relevant to different demographics. I get the business logic behind it, obviously. You have to grow, and you have to follow the money. But sometimes I can't help but feel like the "flavor" of these events gets diluted in the process. When you start blending everything together to appeal to a global audience, do you lose that unique, localized charm that made people fall in love with the event in the first place?
It’s a weird balancing act between evolution and identity. If you change everything to make sure everyone feels included, does the original thing even exist anymore?
Do you think modernizing traditions is a necessary evil for survival, or is it just corporate pandering?
Lately, it feels like every major institution is undergoing this massive pivot to stay relevant to different demographics. I get the business logic behind it, obviously. You have to grow, and you have to follow the money. But sometimes I can't help but feel like the "flavor" of these events gets diluted in the process. When you start blending everything together to appeal to a global audience, do you lose that unique, localized charm that made people fall in love with the event in the first place?
It’s a weird balancing act between evolution and identity. If you change everything to make sure everyone feels included, does the original thing even exist anymore?
Do you think modernizing traditions is a necessary evil for survival, or is it just corporate pandering?