#21 ·
So, I watched it again a few days later—and honestly? It actually hit me harder the second time around. Maybe it’s because I was watching it with a group this time, and they kept bugging me about what happens next while I just sat there playing it cool and staying silent. Definitely recommend watching this with friends—it's way better when you can toss theories back and forth. I didn't spoil anything for them, obviously, I just gave them little nudges toward certain details when I felt like it.
The thing is, if you watch it solo—especially the first time—there’s just too much going on. You’re gonna miss stuff. It helps to pause and rewind here and there, even if that totally ruins the vibe for some people.
All those layers and tiny details... they're kind of a double-edged sword. If you aren't 100% locked in—like, if you're wiped from work or whatever—you'll definitely miss things. And even if you catch everything, some of those bits feel a little hollow, I guess.
My main gripe with the ending, though, was that the rich guy still had his gun and just... didn't use it. I get that the scene where the Black woman starts smashing the glass sculptures was meant to show how the rest of his wealthy friends briefly joined in before chickening out once things got too real. It perfectly mirrors what he told the detective about "disruptors." Society loves the idea of disruption until it actually gets messy, then everyone retreats. That's exactly what happened there. But she didn't back down—she burned it all down, the house included, and the Mon Lisa too. So, she was the only actual disruptor in the room. Everyone else? Just fake.
Anyway, regardless of that metaphor the writer was trying to push, the ending felt a bit off to me. Even if I see what they were going for. Either way, like I said: better than the first watch.
The thing is, if you watch it solo—especially the first time—there’s just too much going on. You’re gonna miss stuff. It helps to pause and rewind here and there, even if that totally ruins the vibe for some people.
All those layers and tiny details... they're kind of a double-edged sword. If you aren't 100% locked in—like, if you're wiped from work or whatever—you'll definitely miss things. And even if you catch everything, some of those bits feel a little hollow, I guess.
My main gripe with the ending, though, was that the rich guy still had his gun and just... didn't use it. I get that the scene where the Black woman starts smashing the glass sculptures was meant to show how the rest of his wealthy friends briefly joined in before chickening out once things got too real. It perfectly mirrors what he told the detective about "disruptors." Society loves the idea of disruption until it actually gets messy, then everyone retreats. That's exactly what happened there. But she didn't back down—she burned it all down, the house included, and the Mon Lisa too. So, she was the only actual disruptor in the room. Everyone else? Just fake.
Anyway, regardless of that metaphor the writer was trying to push, the ending felt a bit off to me. Even if I see what they were going for. Either way, like I said: better than the first watch.