200 points for "persistent trolling" - Tom

If this isn't straight-up harassment and bullying, I don't know what is.

Tom, who’s told me to my face multiple times he can't stand the sight of me, just slapped me with an extra 200 points for "persistent trolling and irrelevant nonsense." So now, instead of being back by Sunday, I'm stuck in ban land until Thursday.

I'm asking rustydrifter10 or Edgar (depending on which one is handling the OECD stuff today) to take a look at this 200-point penalty, because what he's doing is literal terror.

Also, rustydrifter10, can you please send over that partial OECD PDF ASAP? Thanks.

p.s. I'm not posting this in my previous appeal because rustydrifter10 said every single appeal needs its own thread, so here we are. Thanks.

rustydrifter10, please give me your honest take—is this actually worth a full 200 points? Thanks in advance.

rustydrifter10?

The whole thread is just getting cluttered. Honestly, since we’ve been trying to explain to you for years that you need to stop spamming, I don't think anyone's going to complain about this. I actually sent you a partial breakdown over at the OECD.

Alright, thanks for getting back to me

There's no way a single card can be used as a collective for just one post!!

this post should easily grab 200 points:

"Federer pulls out of New York City and Cincinnati due to knee issues

Thiem's status for the US Open is uncertain

Zverev skips New York City due to exhaustion"

regarding the topic of tennis at the Olympics

it’s honestly hilarious how I always get flagged by the SAME mods—the ones whose grading rubrics I actually helped write. thanks a lot, really. Paris isn't even happening for another three years. And what a coincidence, right? I was getting graded on the Olympics five years ago too. Clearly, the problem isn't just the users on this forum.

thanks Nice, you're a legend!! 🔝