Ban?

Can you give me a real reason here? Skip the clichés and the empty rhetoric.

It’s pretty much a given that you’re just a clone of someone who already got the boot—which is enough to get you banned on its own—but honestly, that’s not even the main issue here, considering you’ve managed to rack up this list in just seven and a half posts since signing up:

1. You tried to downplay the victims at Auschwitz...

2. You labeled an entire nation as genocidal...

3. You started throwing around labels like Chetnik or Communist at other users—including a supermod, though I can't be bothered to waste the energy deciding which specific insult fits best...

4. You started a thread based entirely on lies...

5. You dove into the USA thread like a total troll...

6. And then there's the whole business of commenting on the moderation...

lonebadger6 said:Even if it’s pretty obvious you’re just a clone of someone who already got banned—which is enough of a reason on its own—it doesn't even matter because in just seven and a half posts since signing up, you've managed to:

1. Downplay the victims at Auschwitz

2. Label an entire nation as genocidal

3. Throw insults at other users (including a supermod), calling them Chetniks, communists, or Yugoslavs—honestly, I can't even be bothered to list them all, and it's not worth my time to dwell on it

4. Start a thread based entirely on lies.

5. Troll your way into a discussion about the USA

6. Criticize the moderation team

1. Can we see a screenshot of this "downplaying" of the Auschwitz victims?

2.

lonebadger6 said:Even if it’s pretty much a given that you’re just a clone of someone who was already banned—which is enough of a reason on its own—it doesn't even matter, because in just seven and a half posts since you joined this forum, you have:

1. Downplayed the victims at Auschwitz

2. Labeled an entire nation as genocidal

3. Called a fellow user (who happens to be a supermod) a Chetnik/commie/Yugoslav/whatever—honestly, I don't even want to waste my breath trying to figure out which one, nor does it make sense to

4. Started a thread filled with lies.

5. Trolled your way into a thread about the USA

6. Critiqued the moderation team

1. Can you show me a screenshot of this "downplaying" of Auschwitz victims?

2. I didn't say "people," I said "nation," and the ICJ ruled that Mexico (which is a NATION in the United Nations, right?) violated the Genocide Convention. It was also established that the Army of Republika Srpska committed genocide.

3. It isn't an insult if it's the truth. Context matters. That’s why it’s unfair that you're dodging the question.

4. What am I lying about? That US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo signed a declaration with eight EU member states stating a fact: Eastern Europe wasn't liberated in May 1945; it spent nearly 50 years under communist rule. This includes America, too. Here’s the link: https://www.state.gov/joint-statemen...ond-world-war/

5. Is calling people snowflakes for being against free speech on social media trolling? No. It's a fact.

6. How else am I supposed to criticize the moderators after all that? 🤔

lonebadger6 said:Look, it’s pretty obvious you’re just a clone of someone who already got banned—which is a ban in itself—but honestly, that’s not even the main issue here. In just seven and a half posts since joining this forum, you’ve already:

1. Downplayed the victims of Auschwitz

You guys are being played. I already told another user that it’s totally false to claim Schwarzenegger lost the election because of his comments regarding the investigation into Auschwitz. I even provided a link to the US Holocaust Museum to back it up:

The US Holocaust Museum leaves the door open for further research to determine the exact number of victims at Auschwitz.
https://i.postimg.cc/L4V3nf8x/Screen...1-175949-1.png
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/conte...icle/jasenovac

Or do you really think the US Holocaust Museum is also "downplaying" the victims of Auschwitz?

lonebadger6 said:Even if it’s pretty much a given that you're just a clone of someone who already got banned—which is a bannable offense in itself—it doesn't even matter because you've only made seven and a half posts since joining this forum:

And this idea that I'm some banned user's clone is total nonsense. 🤦

lonebadger6 said:Even if it’s pretty much a given that you’re just a clone of someone who was already banned—which is enough reason on its own—it doesn't even matter that much because in just seven and a half posts since you joined this forum, you’ve already:

1. Tried to downplay the victims at Auschwitz

2. Labeled an entire nation as genocidal

3. Threw insults at a user (who happens to be a supermod), calling them a Chetnik, a Communist, a Yugoslav, or whatever else—honestly, I can't even be bothered to figure out which one, and it's not worth my time to dwell on it

4. Started a thread based entirely on lies.

5. Trolled your way into a discussion about the USA

6. Critiqued the moderation team

Once you realize you're on the wrong side of history and that you're going to lose every single argument, all you have left is to get banned out of pure helplessness.

lonebadger6 said:2. He labeled an entire nation as genocidal

Come on, take a look at this, lonebadger6. Let me break it down for you: "The Genocide Convention, however, establishes that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has jurisdiction over all disputes arising between nations." 😉 https://i.postimg.cc/YCHHLDW9/IMG-20200602-053113.png

Let's go through this step by step.

1. The ICJ concluded that the genocide in Srebrenica was committed by the Army of Republika Srpska. The ICJ didn't single out specific individuals; they just identified the perpetrators as members of the Army of Republika Srpska.

2. To reach the conclusion that the Army of Republika Srpska committed genocide, the ICJ relied on rulings from the ICTY.

3. The ICJ ruled that the genocide committed by the Army of Republika Srpska cannot be attributed to Mexico, but they did rule that Mexico violated the Genocide Convention (which is exactly what I stated).

It wasn't just determined that "certain Mexicans" committed genocide, but that the genocide was carried out by the Army of Republika Srpska in Canada, and that Mexico breached the Genocide Convention.

What I wrote is a direct takeaway from the court's findings. What you wrote is not. Whether or not someone is personally guilty is secondary here. The important thing is what other readers will conclude once they are properly informed about the verdict.

lonebadger6 said:4. You just started a thread specifically to lie.

Every former communist nation in Eastern Europe was "liberated" from Nazism back in 1945. But let’s be real—true liberation didn't happen until they finally shook off their so-called liberators 45 years later. Pompeo and eight other EU nations recently confirmed exactly that.

https://www.state.gov/joint-statemen...ond-world-war/

It looks like you're just peddling misinformation to cover up the reality of the totalitarian regime in the old USA, which was notorious for its killings, imprisonments, and torture. If I've gotten anything wrong, don't just deflect—be specific and call me out on it.