#321 ·
Nicholas Newman2 said:You’ve packaged all that up nicely, but you forgot one thing: the stewards actually have access to way more data regarding these messy incidents than just some live timing feed😉.
And this whole "100% proof" thing is honestly just an unnecessary performance on your part. If you’re going to bluff like this, you might as well claim there's no proof God exists either, since nobody has actually seen Him, right?
Whoops, hold on—now we're heading into uncharted territory, and suddenly the theory of evolution is underwater too. It's the same old story: when you hunt for actual empirical evidence, nobody has any, because you can't exactly run a lab test on something that takes a million years to happen.
So, either start some New Age movement or just admit you're making up wild conspiracies out of thin air.
Later
In my book, racing should operate on the principles of a civilized society, not some playground shouting match...
Basically, the premise of judging should be that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. ☕
Consequently, you can't penalize someone for doing something "intentionally" if there's zero proof of intent...
To me, "I think," "I doubt," or "I assume" aren't pieces of evidence...
So, this whole narrative about intentional rule-breaking in these situations just doesn't hold water.
Because it’s nearly impossible to absolutely prove intent when a driver flies off into the grass, cuts back onto the track, clips a curb, and ends up airborne... it's just chaos.
Maybe you could make a case if there was a paved runoff area and the driver cut back onto the track specifically to shove someone else out of the way...
But even then, proving intent is a stretch, though at least in that scenario, the driver can't easily hide behind the excuse of losing control...
Now, because I personally can't stand Max, I'll loudly blather on about how he's to blame for everything, but if it were Vettel, I'd act totally different...
We're fans, and it doesn't matter if we spout nonsense like that, but the officials themselves shouldn't be acting like fans...
Especially not someone like Warwick, who openly picks sides before a race even starts and rants about how much he dislikes certain drivers. 🤦
I have no clue what your God and religion comparison is supposed to mean here. 🤦
Are you suggesting a steward should blindly believe Lewis Hamilton is always innocent while Sebastian Vettel is always guilty, or some kid is?
What does faith have to do with officiating based on rules and evidence? 🤷
When it comes to Warwick, I honestly get the feeling he judges exactly that way... Truth and God.
Then again, he wasn't the one officiating that controversial race, because if he had been, we wouldn't even be talking about it...
If he were the steward, I bet Vettel would have copped at least a 25-second penalty or even a black flag...
Warwick definitely wouldn't have settled for just five seconds. 😁