Morgan Hill4 said:Turns out Ferrari didn't actually have another fresh set of Softs. Just checked the tire regs. For the whole GP weekend, they allocate 13 sets of slicks plus wets, but 6 sets go back after FP—even if you didn't touch them. Those 6 sets are reserved for qualifying and the race, plus whoever makes it into Q3 gets one extra set of the softest compound, which also goes back to Pirelli after qualifying wraps up. Honestly, the rule is pretty retarded.

Man, I had no clue about this nonsense. 🤦
Good grief, that is peak stupidity right there. 😵
Realistically, nobody’s getting through qualifying without burning at least 3 sets of SS to finish in a decent spot (basically just making it through Q2),
and even then, only Mercedes can pull that off. Everyone else needs at least 4 sets of SS, leaving them with maybe one Medium and one Soft. 🤦
Mother my race, races where everyone just shreds tires like crazy are going to be absolute madness. 🤦 😵
If this table is actually right, then for teams like Williams/FI/RB/STR, even attempting to hit Q3 is insanity, let alone actually driving in it. 🤣
Because according to this, anyone who missed Q3 ended up with 7 sets of tires...
while those who made Q3 had 2 fresh sets and 4 worn ones...
maybe they could have had 3 vs 3 like Ferrari if they hadn't run two laps in Q3...
Basically, it looks like Ricciardo would've definitely grabbed a podium if he hadn't made Q3 and finished 9th in Q2 instead.
He would've started just one spot further back but would've had 2 more fresh sets of rubber, and he'd have started on a brand new set...
So instead of running used SS, new SS, new Soft, used SS, he could have run new SS, new Soft, new SS.
And if he'd run new Soft, new SS, new SS, who knows, maybe he would've even snatched the win, since there's always a chance he wouldn't have had to pit before a red flag...
Who knows, maybe he'd even have lucked out and started on SS...