CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Maggie (2015)

Maggie (2015)

Started by Kenneth Ramos6 · · 👁 2 views · 9 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Kenneth Ramos6William Newman2Patrick MartinJamie Turner80feralowl18Lawrence Booth2Eric Hayes61Morgan Petersonnortherncobra31
Kenneth Ramos6 Kenneth Ramos6 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined Sep 2015
#1 ·
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1881002/
image
So, when Maggie gets hit by this weird virus that starts turning her into a cannibalistic zombie—during that whole transformation process—her super loving dad (who happens to be the legendary Arnold, of course!) sticks right by her side, even if it might actually cost him his life.
Have you guys seen this yet? Are you planning to, or maybe just skipping it entirely? If you have watched it, what did you think?
It feels like Arnold is getting closer to the end of his career, and since he’s basically a legend to me, I just can't pass up any chance to see him on screen.
Personally, I thought the movie was pretty decent—maybe a 7/10—though I guess it’s definitely not for everyone.
I should probably mention that there is very, very little action—almost none, really—and Arnold doesn't talk nearly as much as he used to; it honestly feels like the writers didn't quite "use" him enough.
The concept behind the film is excellent, but maybe the execution wasn't quite there, though the acting was pretty solid.
They portray Arnold as a total Alpha Male, and man, that beard in this movie... just 🙏 🙏
Abigail (playing Maggie) also did an amazing job! She had a few rough spots, but hey, I'm not claiming this is some absolute masterpiece or anything.
My final tip: if you need to rewind the ending five times, go ahead and do it! That last scene has way more depth than it seems at first glance.
William Newman2 William Newman2 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jul 2015
#2 ·
Has Schwarzenegger ever made anything worse than this? Seriously—it’s so mind-numbing you lose interest after just a few minutes. In my opinion, the IMDb rating actually reflects the quality this time around.
Patrick Martin Patrick Martin Regular
702 messages
joined Aug 2015
#3 ·
It’s just this pretentious, cheap, slimy, and totally shady way to commercialize Shrek,
honestly, I hate everything about this movie, like, literally every single thing.

☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
Jamie Turner80 Jamie Turner80 Member
37 messages
joined Jul 2009
#4 ·
The issue with Maggie is fundamentally different: the film is simply tedious. While there are a handful of jarring lines of dialogue scattered throughout, they are far too sparse to carry any weight. Most of the runtime consists of aimless wandering and the repetitive cycling of narrative patterns established in the opening act. Beyond that, the explanation regarding the virus's origins feels nonsensical, and the lack of meaningful government intervention—or even a visible apocalypse, given that one logically necessitates the other—makes it impossible to take this story seriously. As a debut effort, Maggie feels like an experiment attempting to subvert genre tropes, yet it fails to find its footing. It remains entirely possible that a future filmmaker might succeed where Maggie fell short.

read more at:
http://film-na-dan.blogspot.com/2015/05/maggie.html
Patrick Martin Patrick Martin Regular
702 messages
joined Aug 2015
#5 ·
Jamie Turner80 said:The issue with Maggie is something else entirely: the movie is just plain boring.

Well, duh, it’s boring because it does exactly what I just laid out for you.

I’m telling you, I bet Arnold had his hands in this too, acting like some kind of co-author,
or honestly, he probably even directed the whole thing under a fake name. ☕
feralowl18 feralowl18 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Nov 2013
#6 ·
Just watched it. Honestly? A total drag—way too slow and felt unfinished. The opening was a complete mess and it just kind of fizzled out at the end. 2/10
Lawrence Booth2 Lawrence Booth2 Regular
297 messages
joined Sep 2022
#7 ·
Honestly, it’s just painful watching you guys tear him apart like this
Eric Hayes61 Eric Hayes61 Member
20 messages
joined Nov 2015
#8 ·
it isn't actually all that bad 😉
Morgan Peterson Morgan Peterson Member
44 messages
joined Jan 2023
#9 ·
I found it to be quite compelling. Arnold truly excelled by stepping out of his usual comfort zone to tackle such an atypical role—a father who remains steadfastly by the side of his terminally ill daughter until the very end. Had her illness been something more conventional, perhaps cancer, the film would have drifted into the territory of a standard family drama; wouldn't that have been somewhat tragicomic with a tough guy like Arnie leading the charge? However, it is precisely this "zombie virus" that injects the necessary sense of dread into the narrative. The way they depict this "creeping" apocalypse—a world unraveling both in the lives of the protagonists and their immediate surroundings—is masterfully done. Even though the trajectory is clear from the start, one can't help but cling to the hope for a different outcome, largely due to the stellar performances from Arnold and his daughter. For me, if I don't find myself genuinely invested in the characters, the movie fails; in this case, I cared deeply about them.
The pacing might feel deliberate to some, given that we aren't seeing endless action sequences of Arnold smashing through hordes of zombies, but if someone actually enjoys TWD—which, in my humble opinion, is a far more tedious and sluggish series than any soap opera you'd find on daytime television—then they will find this plot moves at a fantastic, cinematic clip.
In any event, I’d give it an 8/10.
northerncobra31 northerncobra31 Active Member
125 messages
joined Apr 2023
#10 ·
It was alright, but I felt like there was a lot missing. It honestly feels like they chopped out way too many minutes just to trim the runtime down, but that's just me...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads