#1 ·
We usually spend our time rating doctors, but for a change, we can use this space to share our experiences within specific hospitals...
RHEUMATOLOGY AT OAKLAND HOSPITAL:
What used to be a specialized department focused on treating rheumatology patients has morphed into something resembling an absurd emergency room service. They even have a schedule posted on the wall dictating how many beds they must reserve daily for ER admissions—essentially earmarking spots for whoever rolls in through the emergency door. This quota sits at 14 beds a week. For a unit with 30 beds, isn't it strange that perhaps only two or three actual rheumatology and immunology patients are being treated there? Oakland Hospital truly has no justification for maintaining a Rheumatology Department anymore! The unit should be closed because it no longer serves its purpose; it’s no longer dedicated to patients suffering from rheumatological, immunological, or allergic diseases. Both Medicare and the Department should step in to conduct an audit and see if this department should simply be dissolved instead of pretending it still functions as a rheumatology unit. If they looked at the data from, say, 2014, and checked the percentage of rheumatology patients actually hospitalized in the Rheumatology Department... it would be clear that the unit needs to be shut down.
Secondly, they used to have wonderful doctors. Most of them have either passed away or retired. Now, while there are some good doctors left, the department feels like it's being run by a revolving door of interns and residents. You never really know who your doctor is, who is actually treating you, or where you belong. As a patient, I don't want my physician to just pass me in the hallway during discharge, shouting that they'll "write everything down in the papers" while I'm walking past. During my stay, I dealt with three different doctors, repeating my entire history to every single one, yet nobody seemed to listen. One resident even told me she didn't care about my medical history or why I was admitted—she only cared about what was happening today. And this, of course, was after I had waited months just to be seen! To have someone act so arrogant when you finally get care is infuriating, especially since she mentioned she'll be a rheumatologist once she finishes her residency.
The nurses on the floor are fine. They are well-organized and honestly quite commendable (except for one grumpy, rude individual out of maybe ten, but the rest were great).
The doctors? It's hit or miss. For those of us who stayed with the "old guard," no one bothered to ask which physician we wanted to see moving forward; they just reassigned us to whoever was available, which isn't right.
On top of that, in the outpatient clinic, doctors seem to swap constantly. Whether it's a group of interns or residents, I don't care—the fact remains that I am telling my story to someone I will likely never see again, only for "my" doctor to glance at the results for a split second before "blessing" them without even seeing me. It’s terrible! How can anyone build trust this way? If this is a cost-cutting measure, they should just be honest and tell us they don't have the budget to maintain a consistent patient-doctor relationship, or that they simply don't want us as patients so we can go elsewhere. That would solve the problem.
Since I know someone will eventually try to turn this thread into a way to settle personal scores with specific doctors, nurses, or staff, a little warning for everyone: this thread is not for insults, harassment, or attacking people in hospitals, departments, or support staff. Praise is welcome, and criticism is fine, but there will be no verbal abuse. Any post like that will be deleted and sanctioned.
Let's treat this topic as constructive criticism regarding what needs to improve in the system and what we should strive for, rather than a place to vent vitriol. We've had similar threads before that always end up being locked because they devolve into personal attacks against doctors and nurses. If you have legal grievances, take them to court, not a forum.
melloworca6
RHEUMATOLOGY AT OAKLAND HOSPITAL:
What used to be a specialized department focused on treating rheumatology patients has morphed into something resembling an absurd emergency room service. They even have a schedule posted on the wall dictating how many beds they must reserve daily for ER admissions—essentially earmarking spots for whoever rolls in through the emergency door. This quota sits at 14 beds a week. For a unit with 30 beds, isn't it strange that perhaps only two or three actual rheumatology and immunology patients are being treated there? Oakland Hospital truly has no justification for maintaining a Rheumatology Department anymore! The unit should be closed because it no longer serves its purpose; it’s no longer dedicated to patients suffering from rheumatological, immunological, or allergic diseases. Both Medicare and the Department should step in to conduct an audit and see if this department should simply be dissolved instead of pretending it still functions as a rheumatology unit. If they looked at the data from, say, 2014, and checked the percentage of rheumatology patients actually hospitalized in the Rheumatology Department... it would be clear that the unit needs to be shut down.
Secondly, they used to have wonderful doctors. Most of them have either passed away or retired. Now, while there are some good doctors left, the department feels like it's being run by a revolving door of interns and residents. You never really know who your doctor is, who is actually treating you, or where you belong. As a patient, I don't want my physician to just pass me in the hallway during discharge, shouting that they'll "write everything down in the papers" while I'm walking past. During my stay, I dealt with three different doctors, repeating my entire history to every single one, yet nobody seemed to listen. One resident even told me she didn't care about my medical history or why I was admitted—she only cared about what was happening today. And this, of course, was after I had waited months just to be seen! To have someone act so arrogant when you finally get care is infuriating, especially since she mentioned she'll be a rheumatologist once she finishes her residency.
The nurses on the floor are fine. They are well-organized and honestly quite commendable (except for one grumpy, rude individual out of maybe ten, but the rest were great).
The doctors? It's hit or miss. For those of us who stayed with the "old guard," no one bothered to ask which physician we wanted to see moving forward; they just reassigned us to whoever was available, which isn't right.
On top of that, in the outpatient clinic, doctors seem to swap constantly. Whether it's a group of interns or residents, I don't care—the fact remains that I am telling my story to someone I will likely never see again, only for "my" doctor to glance at the results for a split second before "blessing" them without even seeing me. It’s terrible! How can anyone build trust this way? If this is a cost-cutting measure, they should just be honest and tell us they don't have the budget to maintain a consistent patient-doctor relationship, or that they simply don't want us as patients so we can go elsewhere. That would solve the problem.
Since I know someone will eventually try to turn this thread into a way to settle personal scores with specific doctors, nurses, or staff, a little warning for everyone: this thread is not for insults, harassment, or attacking people in hospitals, departments, or support staff. Praise is welcome, and criticism is fine, but there will be no verbal abuse. Any post like that will be deleted and sanctioned.
Let's treat this topic as constructive criticism regarding what needs to improve in the system and what we should strive for, rather than a place to vent vitriol. We've had similar threads before that always end up being locked because they devolve into personal attacks against doctors and nurses. If you have legal grievances, take them to court, not a forum.
melloworca6