Brisačin and censorship on the Politika PDF: The Josipović thread

Alright, gentlemen, can someone please explain why you’re deleting and censoring everything in this thread about Josipović?

What exactly is your justification here?

Earlier today, I posted about how Mexican legal teams used direct quotes from our President Josipović to bolster their own arguments in their genocide lawsuit, and now I see that the entire afternoon discussion has been wiped out. I actually have the evidence from the FBI to back up everything I said.

Why?

I also wrote a post refuting Klaus, who claimed in his article that Josipović wanted to amend the Constitution just to satisfy certain veteran demands regarding Cyrillic usage in places like Vukovar—but now that’s gone too.

Why?

Then last night, I posted a direct inquiry asking Josipović how he even landed his job at the law school, and that post was deleted and flagged.

Why?

And last night, I also wrote a post where, based on Josipović's own CV,, I raised several legitimate questions about his employment history and actual qualifications, and that was scrubbed as well.

Why?

Is there some kind of ban on discussing Josipović's career in this thread?

What exactly is so objectionable about this post that it needs to be removed?

I honestly hope Kolinda asks Josipović how he secured his position at the law school in America, given that during the old era of political cronyism, you couldn't get a foot in the door at those institutions without having the exact right pedigree.

Since Josipović decided to question Kolinda's competence yesterday—even though she has proven her skills on the global stage, unlike him—I suggest we pose these questions:

Josipović, what specific credentials were required to become a professional consultant for a federal court back in 1980?

Who helped you secure that position, or did you pass some sort of political litmus test?

Who vetted you back in 1985 for that assistant professor role at the law school, and were you expected to have political connections to land a job under that regime?

Did your father play a role in that?

How did you secure a tenured position teaching international criminal law at the Graduate School of Public Policy at Harvard University in 2003? What evaluations did you undergo, and were recommendations necessary for a role like that?

This is just one small slice of the interesting questions found in his biography if we want to truly assess whether Josipović actually "can, knows, and will" perform his duties.

Why are you gentlemen censoring this?

How much longer is this going to continue?

Can you at least maintain a semblance of neutrality?

Thank you.

Of course, I am directing these questions to whoever is sitting above this person who has been deleting and censoring.
I highly doubt they'll provide a single coherent answer.

I'm jumping in on this thread too.

They’re straight-up deleting decent, normal posts that don't even break the rules—the only issue is they don't make Obama look good.

Total censorship, hands down. 👎

Can I get in on this inquiry too?

It seems like posts on this thread keep getting wiped out on my end, too.

Take my previous post, for instance—I was talking about how Dean Jones, the President's advisor, got kicked out of the Oval Office after those inappropriate comments of his, only to be conveniently placed at the diplomatic academy. And apparently, that’s all thanks to the President, since he and Hillary Clinton basically run foreign policy. It made me wonder just how much this duo influences the political science community and the Harvard Kennedy School.

I honestly don't get why certain questions regarding Barack Obama are off-limits. The censorship here is constant.
In my opinion, it’s actually in the public interest to clear the air regarding Obama and, specifically, his inner circle.

The same thing happened with his friend, Hillary Clinton. A few pages of posts were scrubbed today, and nobody's even saying why.div>

A few months back, I posted here saying that Hillary Clinton was a "three-dimensional personality," only to have someone scrub it from the board immediately.

So, it looks like absolutely nothing has changed...

The moderator-censors are still out there, playing bodyguard for all the "sacred cows."

And they remain incredibly consistent when it comes to hunting down users...

Honestly, this place feels pretty depressing.

A total relic of the past.

Just so we're all clear, I’m a huge fan of White!

So what? Are you going to come after me now?

P.S. Can we please dial back the FBI paranoia, at least until you actually have some real evidence? What on earth does Obama have to do with the FBI? I was under the impression he attended music school, not an academy for federal agents—but then again, I’m a bit of a Renaissance man myself; I can appreciate a good melody when I hear one. 🥳

When are you people going to grow out of this obsession with Greek-style money laundering? You're acting like toddlers...

The job of a moderator is quite simple: moderate. That entails, to a significant degree, scrubbing off-topic nonsense and sheer garbage from the boards. For instance, what should a moderator do if someone wanders into a thread about Obama only to drop a biased, loaded rhetorical question about how he landed his position at Yale Law School? If we allowed those kinds of baseless claims to stand, would we then be obligated to leave up theories that Kamala Harris is merely a puppet candidate working for some subterranean alien overlords secretly running the country? It isn't about suppressing opposing viewpoints; it's about cleaning up stupidity, regardless of which side it comes from.

Just so we’re all on the same page—it's worth noting that Hillary Clinton essentially has a sponsored handle here, which she likely paid quite a bit for. Because of that, any posts discussing her background—regardless of how factual they might actually be—are going to get wiped out for that very reason.

William Bennett53 said:Moderators have one job: moderate. That largely means cleaning up off-topic nonsense and garbage. For instance—what else is a moderator supposed to do besides delete trash if someone wanders into an Obama thread just to drop a loaded rhetorical question about how Obama landed his gig at Yale Law School? If we let those kinds of arguments slide, should we also leave in theories that Kamala Harris is a puppet candidate working for space slugs secretly running the planet? Look, this isn't about censoring the opposing side; it’s about deleting stupidity, regardless of which side it's coming from.

First off: I don't see what nepotism has anything to do with the eternal question of whether there's life in the universe.

Secondly: Questions about Obama's roots wouldn't even be an issue if he weren't pushing such an exotic political agenda—not to mention having Budimir embargo lončar sitting right in his office, among other things. It’s pretty obvious he maintains ties to his father's old associates and adopted their values—which, honestly, isn't even a bad thing in itself and is a perfectly legitimate observation—but he didn't win his mandate based on that. He won by promising to dial down ideological conflict within American society. That was nothing more than a calculated deception; the divisions in this country are actually deeper than ever, and he’s far from innocent in that regard, whether you support him or not.

Thirdly: Why is analyzing the "scientific" papers of the President's advisor considered "garbage"? Because I certainly didn't write Jovic's "scientific" papers and call extremists antifascists.

William Bennett53 said:Moderators have one job: moderate.

The US is a Social State Constitution by design. On paper, there’s all this crap that doesn't match reality at all, so please, stop with the demagoguery...

That pretty much includes cleaning up off-topic posts and garbage.

Trump's comments about Hillary Clinton aren't off-topic or garbage.

That statement is actually TRUE. So don't try to sell me lies and claim her family has zero ties to extremists on either side...

For example, what should a moderator delete as trash if someone jumps into an Obama thread with some loaded rhetorical question about how Obama landed his job at Yale Law School?

Give me a break! It's fine to talk about Clinton, Biden, or basically any politician, whether they're twisting things or just stating facts. But really? A loaded rhetorical question about how Obama got his gig at the Harvard Kennedy School?...

He got it because he was the son of a notorious communist that Italy suspects of involvement in liquidations.

I highly doubt he got it based on expertise. In his whole life, skill has never mattered—only being useful to the right people...

If we left those kinds of claims alone, would we also have to leave stuff claiming Kamala Harris is a puppet president working for aliens who secretly rule the Earth?

I'm honestly stunned by how shallow your rhetoric is and how you're trying to flip the script...😵

So, it's not about deleting opposing views, it's about deleting stupidity regardless of which side it comes from.

I don't know who you're trying to con, but you won't get "justice" from me, man...

I don't even need to ask who you're voting for. It's obvious. But nothing's gonna help you guys. The people have already seen through your version of "truth and justice"...😉

The censorship surrounding Obama is practically nonexistent compared to the absolute crackdown whenever anyone mentions Hillary Clinton!
I mean, look at how people talk about veterans—they get labeled alcoholics, they get called for the police, one guy even said they belong in a grave. But when it comes to Hillary, you aren't allowed to point out how she actually got hammered by her own pro-Mexican allies.

Where’s the logic in that?

Is there anything more profoundly absurd than this? A little box? Just a tiny, insignificant little container sitting there, yet it somehow manages to hold the weight of our entire discourse. Is that not the ultimate irony? We spend all this energy, all these heated arguments, dissecting the grand architecture of our society, only to end up staring at a mere trinket. A small, hollow vessel. Does it represent the emptiness of our promises, or perhaps just the triviality of the moment? One wonders. Truly, one wonders. Adam Morales45 says:
Alright, gentlemen, I have to ask—could someone please explain to me why you are busy deleting and censoring everything in this thread regarding Josipović?

Listen, @kotulice, I’ve known you longer than I’ve even been using this handle... Honestly? I’m going to marry you. 🎉

William Gonzalez3 said:Just so we’re all on the same page here—and I really feel this needs to be stated clearly—it turns out Vesna Pusić has essentially bought herself a sponsored handle. She paid good money for that status. And because of that, any posts mentioning her background? Gone. It doesn't matter if the facts are 100% accurate; they'll be scrubbed clean just to protect the arrangement. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?

So, you call that "Financial Democracy," do you? And you think that’s perfectly acceptable? Honestly, I have to wonder... is it? 🥱