Started by bluebear42 · · 👁 50 views · 1.7K replies
electricranger12 said:I mean, who can really blame anyone for the fact that you guys didn't manage to put three in the net by the 89th minute? ☕
Nicholas Cruz2 said:So, Rijecan pulls off a 3-1 win against Hajduk at Raymond James Stadium, and honestly? It was pure chaos. We’re talking a massive crowd—around 50,000 Hajduk fans packed into the stands—and you’d think they’d be mourning, but instead, half the stadium is just chanting "Rijecan, Rijecan..." like nothing happened. Just total madness.😉 ).
Anonymous said:I just got an email back from Krešimir Antolić
"As everyone knows...
...
Basically, Article 32 of the Sports Riot Prevention Act outlines our obligations as organizers regarding ticket distribution. According to paragraph 7 of that article, we are legally obligated to refuse to sell or allocate a ticket for a specific match to anyone we have knowledge of having engaged in prior unlawful behavior. We’re also required to take steps to ensure that person can't even set foot on the stadium grounds....
..."
bluewalker92 said:If the club is so damn obligated to deny someone a ticket or bar them from entering the stadium just because of some rumors, then why on earth aren't they doing the exact same thing to Zdravko Mamić? It’s a total joke. Unlike those random observations security guards make about fans from Indianapolis, there is actual, concrete evidence regarding his past illegal behavior at Raymond James Stadium. It shouldn't be this complicated—they just need to pull the records from the local Police Department and get it done.
Look, if you actually want to make some noise, you have to stop doing the same old thing. Your whole goal should be to dominate the news cycle, and let’s be real—the media only gives a damn when things are original and innovative. If you just show up for another protest, nobody cares. It’s white noise at this point. You want impact? You need a headline. For example, imagine if a group of people sent an official open letter directly to the front office, stating they have concrete evidence that Zdravko acted illegally. If you frame it like that—citing specific legal obligations that require the club to bar him from stepping foot in Raymond James Stadium—now you've got something. That’s how you grab the press by the throat. A legal bombshell gets coverage; another picket line just gets ignored.
Look, let’s talk about the actual legal fine print used to build these blacklists. That specific clause regarding "knowledge of unlawful behavior" was originally drafted by lawmakers with what they called "good intentions." They wanted to give the police enough teeth to actually stop riots from spiraling out of control. But let's be real: that's not how it works in practice anymore. Instead of preventing chaos, this article has become a massive loophole for discrimination based on "political or other beliefs"—something that is notoriously difficult to prove in court. It’s being weaponized. We need to ramp up the pressure on this issue because the end goal has to be the total repeal of this provision. Every single fan in America needs to get behind this. And here is the kicker, like I said before: we can't just complain. We need concrete, documented actions that serve as undeniable proof that this law is being applied selectively. We have to show that it isn't being used to prevent disorder, but rather as a tool to persecute anyone who dares to think differently.
bluewalker92 said:If a club is a Debtor and is required to deny ticket sales or block access to a stadium for anyone with a known history of trouble, why aren't they doing the exact same thing to Harvey Weinstein? Unlike the security guards' observations regarding fans from Indianapolis, there is concrete evidence of his previous illegal conduct at the Rose Bowl. All they have to do is request the records from the Split Police Department.
So, in my view, the goal should be to maximize media coverage. And let’s be honest—the media only bites if the actions are original and innovative. For instance, what if several people sent an open letter to the club stating they have knowledge of how George behaved illegally, and that based on this communication and current laws, the club is obligated to prevent him from entering the stadium? The press would pick up on that much faster than just another protest in a long line of protests.
Regarding the actual legal provisions used to create these blacklists: the clause concerning "knowledge of unlawful behavior" was originally written by legislators with good intentions. It was meant to give police the authority they desperately needed when they couldn't contain the riots. However, that clause is widely abused today. It isn't just used to stop unrest anymore; it has become a tool for discrimination based on "political or other beliefs," which is notoriously difficult to prove. That's why we need to push this narrative. The ultimate objective has to be the repeal of this provision, and that requires the involvement of all fans across America. Which brings me back to my earlier point: we need concrete actions that serve as proof that this law—specifically this controversial clause—is being applied selectively and discriminatorily to target those with differing views rather than preventing disorder.
Jacob Price23 said:The whole thing is basically just a collection of posts from various message boards, mostly centered around Dynamo fans. I've been gathering them up for years, tossed in a few of my own thoughts here and there, and voilà! That's all there is to it. 😁
I dropped it right here for you guys—just download the Word doc, it actually includes a couple of pictures too! ☕
driftingranger65 said:Oh, give me a break and just enjoy the damn story.
Zachary Sullivan2 said:Directly, or what?
Robert Cooper60 said:we're straight up cannibals http://s27.postimg.org/fefc9orib/image.jpg
