Gregory Miller said:I’m looking for a quick rundown on the current GPU landscape. I haven't really kept up with the latest tech since the days of the GeForce 6800, so I'm pretty out of the loop regarding the US tech scene.
It seems like there’s a lot of talk here about AMD—does that mean they’ve actually overtaken Nvidia and are making better cards now? A decade ago, AMD had a bit of a reputation for buggy drivers that would crash constantly... personally, I always stuck with Nvidia because they were reliable.
I built a new rig about two years ago (Intel i5-4440, 8 GB RAM, XFX 480W PSU), but I didn't include a dedicated graphics card because I just didn't have the time for gaming. That might change soon, though. I assume a mid-range card would be the sweet spot to run modern titles smoothly at full HD on high settings for the next few years...
I’m also not sure what the deal is with DirectX 12 cards, how pricing looks, or how things are shifting toward 4K resolution... so, if anyone could provide a brief guideline... it's not an urgent purchase. If there's a "best buy" coming later this year or next, I can wait.🙂
Most discussions here revolve around finding something within a specific budget. If we're talking mainstream options (under $667?), AMD is set to release several new models in the $900/$333 to $2400/$833 range soon. Nvidia is also dropping a new $2500-$3000 card shortly.
Basically, AMD has significantly improved their driver situation (especially over the last two years) and they're releasing updates much more frequently now—at least once a month.
Regarding the Nvidia vs ATI debate, AMD has been trailing behind Nvidia lately in terms of power efficiency, while Nvidia lags behind in DirectX 12 performance (and potentially Vulkan, though we'll have to see). There are other minor technical advantages on both sides, but those are the most significant differences.
Speaking of which, Tomb Raider (which uses Nvidia GameWorks) just received another DirectX 12 patch that implemented async compute and possibly other features click. On a 4K Very High setting, for example, a 980Ti loses about 4% performance with this patch, whereas the AMD equivalent (Fury X) actually gains over 18%. That single patch creates a massive 22%+ swing in their relative performance ratio.
Check out today's Vulkan patch for Doom here: click