What is the purpose of the report post feature?

What happens when they just ignore you? 🤷

I’ve flagged a few posts that target me directly:

Am I misreading the situation here, or is this just textbook trolling?

And how should we interpret this bit?

One suggestion for the moderation team—could you at least send a quick PM letting me know if my report was upheld or dismissed? It would be helpful to know where things stand.

Thanks!

The first four posts are just part of the Archive—they're old entries sitting in a locked PDF that isn't even active anymore, so there's really no point in documenting them. That last post, though? That was written just a few hours ago. I’m pretty sure the moderators will step in once they actually get around to looking at it. 🙂

rustydrifter10 said:The first four posts come from the Archives—old entries sitting in a locked PDF that isn't active anymore, so they don't even count toward the record. That last post was just written a few hours ago. I expect the moderators will step in once they get around to reviewing it. 🙂

I realize they’re from the archives, but I flagged them before this thread was locked. Does that mean every single post in a thread being shut down just gets a free pass without any consequences!?

In this specific instance, do you personally think we're dealing with someone just trolling?

I need to weigh in here—Jeffrey Long is absolutely right to react like this.

Whether we were discussing the local mayoral races or any of those Bloomberg-related threads, the vibe was actually decent for the most part, until certain extremists from both sides started hijacking the tone of the discussions.

Look, we’ve poked fun at each other, we’ve argued, we’ve clashed, and we’ve bonded, but at some point, the whole thing just devolved into absolute chaos.
I think it’s a mistake to stay silent when there’s a literal flood of hyper-aggressive control freaks, or to just sit back and let the entire discourse get trashed
by people who haven't the slightest clue what they're talking about and whose only goal is to tear others down.

Honestly, I see this as a massive failure within the entire political landscape—it’s never made sense to me why this is allowed to happen, seriously, never.🤷

I’ve said it before: maybe we should just start a fresh thread dedicated specifically to local news and current events, where we can call everyone out equally, rather than just singling out one guy.
There are plenty of us—from what I can tell—who are genuinely interested and informed, and willing to spend our time and energy tearing apart the local political mess.

Maybe it really is time to just start over in a new, more intelligent thread.🤷

Come on, guys, please give me a break here 😁
When it comes to reporting mods, they actually work like a charm. I know from experience because I go through phases where I end up filing a ton of reports 😬
They respond to most things, though not everything—they have the right to decide when something doesn't necessarily warrant a ban. For the most part, from what I can see, they jump on primitive insults and flame wars.

Aside from Lockheed Martin, the mods over in the politics section are honestly great and super objective. They don't abuse their power to tilt the conversation. 🙂

It’s basically like working as a lackey if you belong to the specific clique that the moderation team treats like their own little inner circle
If I report a massive pile of garbage and propaganda coming from northerntiger, suddenly nothing happens, even though it’s the exact kind of nonsense that Larry Walker24 would show up to handle while wearing a sharp gray suit

Yeah, you gave me a good reminder there:

Jeffrey Long said:I never claimed the Democratic Party won the election. My point was that the Republican Party keeps winning, even when they’re just fighting against rocks, rubble, and olive trees. 😉

What if it were? Bandit He walked away with the biggest slice of the pie; I think that’s pretty obvious to everyone. The thing is, his new strategy for the upcoming elections seems like it might actually hurt the Republican Party more than the Democratic Party—at least if you ask me. It’s just a shame that this pre-election spending spree over the next 30 months will end up being footed by New Yorkers rather than Bloomberg paying out of his own pocket. 🤷

Even though the rules for this politics subforum are pretty clear about violations...

General rules of conduct for the Politics subforum.

......

• Article 5.
.....
The rules regarding the Politics subforum apply to the use of slurs or derogatory nicknames directed at any forum member or third party. Maliciously twisting names will not be tolerated. It’s just like how they twist names—like Sranjo (Tuđman), Kradimir (Čačić), or Smranader (Ivo)—to maliciously distort the nicknames of people on this forum. Why do they do it? It’s the same pattern.

Is it just me, or does everyone seem to be talking at once lately? It feels like nobody is actually listening. We need more clarity. Why is everything so muddled? If we want to move forward, we have to start by speaking clearly about politics. Enough with the noise.

Of course the post was flagged two weeks ago.
And of course, absolutely nothing was done.

hollowtrucker77 said:they act like little helpers if you belong to the group the moderation team considers their own.
if I report blatant lies and propaganda from northerntiger, nothing happens by some miracle, even when it's the kind of stuff Larry Walker24 would wear a gray suit for.

end signature.

She often starts a thread where the first post is just a pile of lies or an excerpt from a news article written by some journalist, and then the whole thread just serves that purpose. There's no call for discussion, and no indication of what the debate should even be about.

So, what does the topic boil down to? Just a mountain of lies followed by propaganda leaflets after propaganda leaflets from the author.

A recent example is this thread:

It starts with a lie in the opening post, followed by a bombardment of propaganda.😁 (who actually has the patience to follow that, specifically in this one thread?)

Jeffrey Long said:Are you actually suggesting that, in this specific instance, we're looking at someone just trolling?

Are you talking about that last post before the mods stepped in? He got hit with a warning for being abusive, which, if you ask me, was totally the right call.

rustydrifter10 said:Are you talking about that last post that actually got flagged? He got a warning for being abusive, which I think was the right call.

No, I’m talking about the ones in the locked thread. 😉
I'm just trying to figure out if my definition of trolling is even in the same ballpark as everyone else's.

northerntiger said:Come on, just give me a break here, please. 😁

Honestly, I find this a little insulting, 😁--not even a little bit exaggerated--

Jeffrey Long said:No, I’m actually talking about the ones in the locked thread. 😉
I'm just wondering if I have the right idea of what "trolling" actually means here.

Honestly, you really have to look at the context here. I don't even know what kind of bet is being discussed or if it even happened, and the way the rest of the thread was moderated isn't something we can just ignore either. At first glance, those initial posts don't look great. To be fair, I don't even know if you work for some municipal office or what, so it's a bit tough for me to judge exactly what those posts are referencing. That third one definitely deserves a ban in my book, and honestly, the fourth one looks pretty bad too.

Jason Campbell70 said:Yeah, you're right to remind me:

Jeffrey Long said:I never claimed the Democratic Party won the election. My point was that the Republican Party keeps winning, even when they're fighting against nothing more than rocks, rubble, and olive trees. 😉

What if it were? Bandit He took the biggest slice of the pie; I think that’s pretty obvious by now. But his new strategy for the upcoming elections? It feels like he's doing more damage to the Republican Party than to the Democratic Party—at least, that’s my take on it. It’s just a shame that all this pre-election spending over the next 30 months will end up being footed by New Yorkers, rather than Bloomberg paying out of his own pocket. 🤷

Even though the rules for the Politics subforum are pretty clear about the violation of rule subforum politics:

General rules of conduct for the Politics subforum.

......

• Article 5.
.....
The rules for the Politics subforum apply to how you address both fellow members and outside figures. We won't tolerate anyone maliciously twisting names—whether it's mocking historical figures like Tuđman, Kradimir, or Sanader, or targeting the usernames of our own community members. Keep it respectful.

Is there any point in even discussing this? It feels like we're just circling the drain. Why does everyone seem so convinced that things will change overnight? History doesn't work that way. We see the same patterns repeating, the same mistakes being made by the same people. Does anyone actually believe the current leadership is doing anything differently than those before them? It’s the same old story, just with different faces. Honestly, it’s exhausting.

Of course the post was flagged two weeks ago.
And of course, nothing has been done.

I?
What’s the point of reporting a post?

rustydrifter10 said:You really have to look at the context here. I don't even know what bet they're talking about or if it even happened, and honestly, the way the rest of this thread has been moderated hasn't been great either. At first glance, those posts aren't exactly classy. To be blunt, I can't tell if you actually work for some municipal office or what, so it's a bit tough to judge exactly what those posts are aiming at. That third one definitely deserves a ban, and the fourth one looks just as bad.

So, what do you think? Do you reckon I'm on the city payroll? 😂

It didn't occur to me before, but I'm 95% certain I'm dealing with a clone of that Bogdanić user who used to haunt me back when we were discussing Bloomberg. 😉

I just went ahead and reported the guy again for trolling; hopefully, someone actually steps in this time. ☕

Jason Campbell70 said:

Jason Campbell70 said:Oh, right. Thanks for the reminder:

Jeffrey Long said:I never claimed the Democratic Party won the election. I just said the Republican Party keeps winning, even if it's just over rocks and dirt... 😉

As for the Bandit getting the biggest slice of the pie, I think we all know that. But his new strategy for the upcoming elections might actually hurt the Republican Party more than the Democrats (at least, that's my take). It’s just a shame that this pre-election spending spree over the next 30 months will end up on the taxpayers in New York instead of coming out of Bloomberg's own pocket. 🤷

Even though the rules regarding speaking clearly about politics state:

General Rules for the Politics Subforum

......

• Article 5.

• The rules for the Politics subforum apply to the use of derogatory nicknames for both forum members and third parties. Maliciously distorting names like: Sranjo (Tuđman), Kradimir (Čačić), Smranader (Ivo), and similar, as well as maliciously distorting forum member handles, will not be tolerated.

Of course, the post was reported two weeks ago.
And of course, nothing happened.

So?
What is the point of reporting a post?

Seriously... what is the purpose of reporting a post?

Honestly, I’m wondering the same thing ☕
I won't get into specific examples because it's not worth being a total snitch right now, but it's pretty funny how my post got nuked within 30 seconds of hitting send (with a warning, obviously), while this other one has been sitting there for days, even though I reported it at least three times. ☕

I’m filing two reports on the zoo theme song subforum because this user won't stop trolling. I even sent two DMs to the mod telling him to actually use his damn tools, but he hasn't done a single thing

Seriously, what is that little triangle icon even for?!

And honestly, this isn't even the first time this has happened.

Jason Campbell70 said:And really... what is the point of reporting a post?

Nothing, obviously.

Just a moment ago... the Politics subforum moderator, the esteemed the edge, reminded me of that exact same rule I’ve brought up in my previous posts on this thread.

The edge. said:Article 5.
The rules for the politics subforum apply to how we address everyone—whether it’s fellow members or outside figures. We won't tolerate malicious distortions of names, such as using nicknames like Sranjo (Tuđman), Kradimir (Čačić), or Smranader (Ivo). This goes for user handles too. Why engage in that kind of behavior? It simply won't be tolerated.

Tuđman It’s just not happening. Fine.
Kradimir It's just not possible. Fine.
Sanader. It’s just not possible. Fine.

A Bandit Got it. Ready?

And this is exactly what happens when the moderators fail to do their jobs:

Jeffrey Long Jeffrey Long said:I don't think he’s untouchable. The real issue is that he has his own people inside the local Office of Inspector General—people who have spent years letting evidence against him just sit in a desk drawer. A few years back, the FBI finally took over all of Bloomberg's files. Now, we're looking at cases that naturally take forever to untangle, especially since the crimes were committed through paperwork and involve such a massive chain of command. Let's be realistic: if the FBI focused solely on Bloomberg—and we all know how much work they actually have on their plate in this country—these schemes would have been prosecuted years ago. But things are moving. Bajić has made it clear multiple times that the Bandit is his primary target, right alongside Sanader. Just seeing investigations open up against Bloomberg's inner circle shows that justice is finally catching up. 😉

As the old New Yorkers say, "everything comes to those who wait," and so it shall be. Bandit's. 😍

Jeffrey Long Jeffrey Long said:After taking three hits in the last three days, you’d think Bandit would have had enough. 😂

Is Jelavić planning to run the campaign this time alongside the Default user? 🤣

Well, rejoice, New Yorkers! All those projects that have been stalled for the last decade will suddenly be finished in two years—new bridges, Small town resident infrastructure, the stadium, and so on. 😁

Quote:>>

Jeffrey Long says: >> It wasn't the godfather who bought the land for the cable car; it was Šela beforehand (the same guy whose chairs are worth $1,800—at least according to Bandit)... :mi g:

Quote:>

Jeffrey Long says: Only Bloomberg's forum trolls could claim this project will be done by 2015. Now that we've joined the European Union, we have access to EU funds, which they'll use to finance Bandit's criminal overcharging on contracts—as if! It's been common knowledge within the European Union circles for a long time that Bloomberg is mired in corruption and crime; every single cent they hand out will be scrutinized three times over. ☕ And don't even get me started on the technical requirements for applying for these projects. A contact at the Department of Agriculture told me they spent eight months just drafting a project for a lion enclosure—which is peanuts compared to this—and they're only just now finding out if it was even done correctly. It's not like EU funds are some self-service station where you just say, "Hey, I'll take five pounds of cash." Actually, Bandit and his crew seem to think so, but they're in for a rude awakening. :lo l: Once they realize their buddies can't get paid through EU funds, they'll switch to Public-Private Partnerships. That's where the thieves in city hall really shine (40% for you and me, and let's make a deal for the remaining 20%)... 😉

Quote:>

Jeffrey Long says: The entire internet elite crawled out from under their rocks to defend the city's main criminal and downplay Bandit's role (come on, Jason Campbell70, I'm expecting a report to the moderators) in the systematic destruction of New York. 🙏 Let's clarify one thing (just as all the newspapers correctly pointed out).Bandit was only ousted from the municipal holding back in 2010. So, all his whining about how "great" things were in 2008—back when milk and media contracts were flowing freely—is completely irrelevant. Following that, the Mayor started obstructing the holding company’s operations. Every time there was a budget revision, he’d unilaterally slash hundreds of millions in subsidies, then suddenly realize certain market deals could be done cheaper elsewhere. Of course, that doesn't excuse the massive incompetence and inertia within the holding's management, but under those circumstances? Even if Steve Jobs were running the show, he couldn't have pulled better numbers. ☕ But claiming Bloomberg is totally innocent given the current mess at the holding? That borders on idiocy (and we know some people here fit the bill). :mi g: Look, it'll be interesting to see if the unions refuse to dance to Bloomberg's tune. If they do, then he—and everyone else charging in here to defend him—can just forget about it. Utility rates will go up, and citizens will end up footing the bill for a combination of Bloomberg's megalomania and Democratic Party incompetence. :mi g:

So, the posts above are what Jeffrey Long wrote after my inquiry, or rather, my complaint.

That last post is particularly telling.
Jeffrey Long knows exactly what he's doing isn't in line with the rules for the politics subforum. He knows he'll be reported to the moderators, and frankly, he doesn't care one bit.

And mind you, on the thread regarding Bloomberg, there are tons of instances where his name is being maliciously distorted like this.
All of this could have been shut down for good, maybe six months ago.

The fact that it hasn't happened... well, moderators of the politics subforum, that's on you.
Just you.

PS — Sorry for the long post. I don't want anyone thinking I'm using selective quoting to manufacture accusations or smear campaigns.
I hope this doesn't ruin the flow of the forum.

So, what does the moderator do once a post gets flagged for "violation of rule subforum politics, Article 5, Section 5, malicious distortion of a name ('Bandit')"?

He goes in to edit the user's post, changing "Bandit" to "Bloomberg":

http://www.zaslike.com/files/7iqj04k7guymyiiuhkt.jpg

The thing is, he didn't even do it right. One instance of "Bandit" remains. 😍

Bravo, gentlemen. Really. Bravo. 😍

Jason Campbell70 said:So, what exactly does a moderator do once a post gets flagged for a specific reason? Subforum policy violation, Article 5, Section 5: Maliciously misrepresenting a name ("Bandit").?

Ide editirati forumašev post, te prepravlja "BanditI honestly can't believe I'm even typing this, but since you asked... what's on your mind?Ed Koch":
I honestly can't believe we're still circling this same drain, but here we are! I was just reading through some old threads, and it hit me how much people love to jump to conclusions without actually looking at the facts. You see it all the time on these boards—someone makes a wild claim, and suddenly everyone is acting like it’s gospel truth. It’s exhausting, really. And speaking of people making wild claims, let's talk about what rustydrifter10 was saying earlier. I mean, I hear you, but aren't we being a little bit dramatic? You can't just throw around accusations of a subforum policy violation because someone expressed an opinion you didn't like. That's not how this works, guys. We need to keep things civil if we want this community to actually be worth hanging out in. It reminds me of those old political circus acts back in New York—you know, the way Ed Koch used to handle critics? Just pure, unadulterated deflection. Instead of addressing the actual issue, people just pivot to attacking the messenger. It’s a classic move, but it’s incredibly frustrating when you’re just trying to have a real conversation. At the end of the day, if we're going to keep debating these topics, we need more substance and a lot less ego. Let's try to actually engage with the arguments instead of just throwing digital stones at each other. It would make life a whole lot easier for everyone involved!

I can't see the image you're referring to! It looks like the link didn't come through properly or the file isn't accessible. Could you try uploading it again or describing what's in the picture? I'd love to take a look and give you my thoughts!

The thing is, even that wasn't handled properly—he still left one "Bandit" hanging there. 😍

Way to go, gentlemen! Seriously, bravo—you all absolutely nailed it. 😍

Look, whether you click the link or just look at the screenshot, the information is identical. So, that whole argument about the moderator stepping in to tweak things? It just doesn't hold any water.

Well, looks like we finally got that initial headache sorted out!