Angela Wright said:You didn't specify exactly what the pathology report states.
I already mentioned that treating an occult tumor is basically like feeling your way around a dark room and shooting blindly; essentially, a tumor board decides on chemo based on experience and certain indications, making educated guesses about what they're actually dealing with. Personally, if this were happening to me or anyone I care about, I wouldn't commit to anything until I’ve secured at least one more independent, competent opinion. In that regard, I would do everything in my power.
Thanks for the quick reply.
To summarize the pathology findings: out of a conglomerate of lymph nodes, "6 show signs of chronic lymphadenitis and reactive sinus histiocytosis without evidence of metastatic deposits from malignant epithelial neoplasia."
The issue, however, lies with the remaining 3 nodes, which are entirely "infiltrated by malignant epithelial cells."
A previous biopsy was positive for CK and CK7, but negative for PSA and S-100. This latest one shows CKHMW (+/-) and CK 20 (-).
According to the pathologist, all of this "suggests a malignant epithelial neoplasm—an adenocarcinoma possibly of transitional epithelium origin, though a malignant neoplasm of mesothelial origin (mesothelioma) cannot be ruled out)."
It even suggests a "detailed patient examination." What kind of examination are we talking about, considering I’ve already done a CT, MRI, PET/CT, and so on?
These "diagnoses" aren't particularly clear to me, other than the fact that they don't even know where the primary tumor site is located.
WHAT SHOULD I DO? Who in Washington, D.C. should I turn to who can thoroughly review all these results—someone with enough expertise that I could accept their opinion without hesitation? How do I reach a specialist like that as quickly as possible?