#1421 ·
Adam Allen said:Best regards,
I'm currently running an Asus HD7770 graphics card and I'm honestly pretty disappointed with it. I play a lot of demanding titles like Crysis and Bioshock at 1920x1080 resolution, and the lag is just unbearable. I'm ready to sell my old card and upgrade, but I'm getting a bit overwhelmed by the options, so I have a few questions:
1.) Is the R9 270 x TOXIC better than the Asus GTX 760?
The R9 270 x TOXIC is $567 whereas the Asus GTX 760 is $667
2.) Does it make sense to spend $167 more to pick up either an ASUS GTX770 or an R9 280 x TOXIC?
The R9 280 x TOXIC is $867 while the Asus GTX 770 is around $250?
I know there are cheaper models out there, but I really want one of the specific cards mentioned above, so please let me know which is the better choice...
Thanks
1. A standard 760 is stronger than the 270x; though, the Toxic might be a slightly overclocked version of the 270x. You should Google some reviews to see the exact specs.
2. Regarding raw power, the 280x toxic outperforms the gtx770 (though it is louder). To quote the specs, the Toxic isn't just your run-of-the-mill 280x:
It's the top-tier, most feature-rich card available, delivering a 30% higher base clock and a 15% higher Boost clock compared to the standard AMD reference design.
review
-At standard resolutions (1920x1200), it's right on the heels of the gtx 780 and r9 290.