Home › Sports › Betting Forum ›
NBA Betting: Vol. 2
NBA Betting: Vol. 2
Started by Raymond Brown11 · · 👁 5 views · 241 replies
#44 ·
Jamison’s just too erratic.
Total DeMar DeRozan vibes.
One minute he's fine, the next he decides he's taking every shot on the floor...
blahhhhh 😢
Looks like Philly is handling business against the Raptors without Porzingis.
They were up by 13, now they're barely holding a 4 or 5 point lead. Typical.
..
Total DeMar DeRozan vibes.
One minute he's fine, the next he decides he's taking every shot on the floor...
blahhhhh 😢
Looks like Philly is handling business against the Raptors without Porzingis.
They were up by 13, now they're barely holding a 4 or 5 point lead. Typical.
..
#46 ·
Things start looking up for a second, then I go check on how Parker's doing and suddenly I'm dizzy. Goodnight, I guess.
#48 ·
I haven't even touched the NBA in like 50 days—and then I go and bet big on Philly and Portland. I figured Portland was fighting for that 5th or 6th seed, so a win against a basement dweller should’ve been a lock, right? Then I actually look at the standings. 🤣
Seriously though, do you guys think this is salvageable?
Seriously though, do you guys think this is salvageable?
#49 ·
What happened with the Indiana Pacers was peak stupidity.
Everything was winding down smoothly—you’re up by 7, you’ve held four leads, you played them beautifully in that final sequence, and you have two free throws with 17 seconds left while the opponent is floored.
And you miss both. Fine, whatever.
They attempt a desperate three, you foul them right as they're going up for a putback dunk, and suddenly it's just a one-point lead.
They draw the foul, shoot the two, and sink one.
There are 5 seconds left on the clock. Plenty of time for them to drive for a layup to tie it.
But hey, you still have 1.2 seconds for one last shot.
The best move would have been to toss it to Roy Hibbert and let him try a soft bank shot off the glass.
Honestly, just go home.
Everything was winding down smoothly—you’re up by 7, you’ve held four leads, you played them beautifully in that final sequence, and you have two free throws with 17 seconds left while the opponent is floored.
And you miss both. Fine, whatever.
They attempt a desperate three, you foul them right as they're going up for a putback dunk, and suddenly it's just a one-point lead.
They draw the foul, shoot the two, and sink one.
There are 5 seconds left on the clock. Plenty of time for them to drive for a layup to tie it.
But hey, you still have 1.2 seconds for one last shot.
The best move would have been to toss it to Roy Hibbert and let him try a soft bank shot off the glass.
Honestly, just go home.
#50 ·
Jason Baker59 said:what is Carmelo waiting for? ☕I was expecting at least 10+ in the first ☕
And here he is with 22.
#52 ·
graniteotter6 said:Looks like the Nuggets let me down on my parlay.,They’re gone. I guess we’re talking about the Oklahoma City Thunder now. Indiana PacersOdds were 5.07. I’m not exactly proud of myself, but I guess it was just stronger than me.
It looks like we have a day ahead of us that could be full of surprises. I suppose you should probably root for the underdogs while you still have the chance.
The play of the century.
It looks like Kevin Love is injured.
If it weren't funny, it would actually be pretty tragic.
#53 ·
Jason Baker59 said:I see 😁 let's go 4 more so I can finally get some sleep ☕
Lucky you. I'm worried; Blake Griffin is already looking like he's ready to pack it in.🙂
#54 ·
Walter Reed3 said:here he is at 22
How much are these 4 personal fouls actually gonna mess things up?
EDIT: 25 🙂
#56 ·
What are you guys even stressing about? The whole quarter is still ahead of him. I’ve got him, and honestly, the over is hitting easy. No sweat at all.
#58 ·
wiredcanyon39 said:Why are you guys even stressing? There's an entire quarter left for him to pull it off. I'm taking the over right now, it’s a lock, no sweat at all.
Hold up, wait—how many individual players are we talking about in the NBA? Like, 5 or 6? That's what keeps tripping me up. 🤣
#59 ·
wiredpilot2 said:Wait, hold up, does the NBA require 5 or 6 individual players? That’s been bugging me. 🤣
6 😉
🔗 Similar threads
- The danger of betting on "gut feelings in Betting Forum · Jul 30, 2026
- Does a team's "revenge" narrative actually hold weight in betting? in Betting Forum · Jul 30, 2026
- Betting on "potential" vs. reality in Betting Forum · Jul 29, 2026
- Betting on long-term futures in Betting Forum · Jul 29, 2026
- The "Second Chance" Paradox: Why do we keep betting on the same players? in Off-topic · Jul 29, 2026