#321 ·
Arthur Hill2 said:I looked at the numbers—Philly allows nearly 19 points at the PF position, and Boozer averages 20 against them. With Hamilton and Deng out, the reality is that Rose and Boozer are basically the only options left. Rose will likely double down in the fourth quarter—just like Carlos did last time when he went over, doubling or even tripling 😬 while Boozer is left out there like a ghost.
I agree with the rest of this, but be careful with those stats from Hoops. I never use them—maybe I should, but I prefer sticking to my own two or three pages for analysis—but I recall Nicholas Chase34 mentioning once that those stats include bench scoring, not just starters.😉
Which means Gibson’s points count toward that total too.
graniteotter6 said:Cheers, James Taylor3. :top :
I don't post here much—mostly because I don't have any inside info (and frankly, I can't be bothered clicking around to figure out who's playing and who isn't), nor am I as detailed as some of you.
Mostly I just read, playing strictly on my gut feeling rather than copying others.
Granger is at 18.5 points. I have a feeling he hits exactly 18. Since they never put Young in the rotation... 🙄 They're playing the Bulls.
Why the skepticism regarding OKC? It shouldn't be a question; based on what I've seen, Dallas is acting like Boston this year—taking easy wins and throwing away the big ones.🤷
I'm hoping Griffin drops another 20 or 21.
Post more often; your insight has always been valued here. 👍
As for Granger, I actually have a feeling his shooting will be abysmal—something like 4-for-15. 😁
Stinky American (mods, no offense intended, I'm referring to a comment Granger made himself: http://nbacro.com/nba/indiana-pacers...-magaraca-8708)
Keith Moore21 said:I'll take them incompetent lot :503
I watched most of the game and I can't believe the Nets, playing with only two real threats, messed up that badly and almost lost... okay, one is D-Will (arguably the best playmaker after Paul), but Morrow... man, what the hell.🤷
What’s on the slate today? If I hit a counter-bet, someone’s going to lose big. :rofl :
Not sure—might skip it entirely. I haven't had much time to dig into the stats, and I've got indoor soccer later. 😁
graniteotter6 said:Last game, all three went under. You laid out the logic nicely, though LeBron looking for the under seems like the safest bet for a while.
Even this guy is copying Granger’s over based on "our" reasoning—it’s almost too easy. s
Now you're actually tempting me to take the under just to see who ends up face-palming more—me or you. :D
Rose over? Hmm. Interesting. But did it occur to anyone that once Beasley returns, Love might actually take fewer shots? 🤷 He cleared 30 points just the other night.
That’s exactly my point. 👍
Beasley is a ball hog, and Rubio hasn't been stingy with possessions since he entered the NBA—so Love’s average could easily drop by two or three buckets. 🤷
