CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Full-body scanning devices: what's the verdict?

Full-body scanning devices: what's the verdict?

Started by Roger Sanders · · 👁 4 views · 5 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Roger SandersAngela WrightMaria Bailey52Scott Allen10
Roger Sanders Roger Sanders MemberOP
21 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1 ·
I’ve used an AMS scanner twice myself, and both times it flagged my health issues perfectly. Now, I hear some people claiming the whole thing is junk and totally inaccurate. I guess it just depends on the individual case.

Does anyone know of another device out there that scans the entire body and can pinpoint exactly where the issue lies? We have someone dealing with neurological problems who just can't find the root cause. Doctors have run CT scans and MRIs on their head, but everything comes back clear.

Is it possible to get a full-body MRI, or perhaps use some other kind of scanning technology that covers the whole organism? If the source of these neurological issues is located somewhere else, then these narrow, targeted exams are just shots in the dark—at least in this specific situation.
Angela Wright Angela Wright Regular
731 messages
joined Feb 2007
#2 ·
Roger Sanders said:I’ve gone to the doctor twice myself for an MRI, and both times they picked up on exactly what was wrong with me. Now I'm hearing people claim the whole thing is garbage and that the results are just total guesswork. I guess it all just comes down to luck.

😁

Is there any other type of device out there that can scan the entire body and pinpoint exactly where things are going wrong? I'm asking because we have someone dealing with neurological issues and they just can't find the root cause. They’ve already gone through the ringer with head CT scans and MRIs, but everything comes back completely normal. It’s incredibly frustrating when the standard tests show nothing, yet the symptoms are very real.

Is it actually possible to run a full-body MRI, or maybe use some other kind of imaging tech that scans the entire organism at once? My reasoning is pretty simple: when you’re hunting for the source of neurological issues, the culprit could be lurking anywhere. Relying on these hyper-targeted, narrow scans feels like taking a shot in the dark—it’s basically just guesswork if you aren't looking at the big picture.

Maybe if someone just tosses a handful of beans at you, you might actually stumble onto a decent diagnosis by sheer luck. 😉

Look, it doesn't work like that. Thank God it isn't that simple. Gather every single test result you have and go find a second opinion. You need a diagnostician who actually has some miles on them—someone with real-world experience under their belt.
Roger Sanders Roger Sanders MemberOP
21 messages
joined Oct 2013
#3 ·
Angela Wright said:😁

Maybe if someone throws a handful of beans at you, you might actually land on a decent diagnosis by sheer luck. 😉

Look, it doesn't work like that. Thank God it doesn't. Gather all your lab results and go get a second opinion. You need a diagnostician who actually has miles of experience under their belt.

A bunch of supposedly "expert" doctors have weighed in, and yet we're still getting nowhere. 😢

Of course, I wasn't suggesting that an MRI or something similar provides a pinpoint diagnosis. My point was using them to identify which area of the body is malfunctioning so further targeted testing can be done.

The nightmare with neurological issues is that the root cause could be anywhere. For instance, poor circulation could mean certain areas aren't getting enough blood, causing the pituitary gland or some other brain center to malfunction even if there's no visible damage, tumor, or inflammation in that specific spot. Or say you have a misaligned spine, and a pinched nerve affects a completely different part of the body. It goes on and on...

I once had a neurologist tell me you could run 100 tests and see absolutely nothing, only for the 101st test to finally reveal the truth. That’s why I thought about streamlining the process—using an MRI or some kind of full-body scanner to pinpoint where the trouble might be lurking, assuming such a machine exists, of course.
Angela Wright Angela Wright Regular
731 messages
joined Feb 2007
#4 ·
Roger Sanders said:A bunch of specialists stepped in—supposedly top-tier experts—yet we’re still stuck with absolutely nothing. 😢

Look, I wasn't suggesting that an MRI or some high-tech scan hands you a definitive diagnosis on a silver platter. My point was that these tools could pinpoint which area of the body is acting up, giving us a target for more specific follow-up testing.

The nightmare with neurological issues is that the root cause can be hiding anywhere. It’s like a faulty wire in a house; you might have a short in the kitchen, but the actual problem is a blown fuse in the basement. For instance, poor circulation could starve the pituitary gland or some other brain center of oxygen, causing it to malfunction even if there isn't a tumor, inflammation, or visible damage in that specific spot. Or maybe it's a slipped disc in your spine pinching a nerve that messes with a completely different part of your body. It's a massive, interconnected web.

I once had a neurologist tell me that you could run a hundred tests and come up totally blind, only for that 101st test to finally crack the case wide open. That's why I thought using something like a full-body MRI or advanced imaging could bypass the guesswork by scanning the entire system to flag potential trouble zones—assuming such a machine exists, of course.

There is no "magic button" solution, and frankly, it's for the exact reasons your doctor laid out. All you end up with is a mountain of lab results piled on a desk and a group of people staring at them, trying to make sense of the chaos.
If you want a second opinion, go to a tenth hospital; otherwise, this is all there is.
Maria Bailey52 Maria Bailey52 Member
11 messages
joined Nov 2012
#5 ·
Fair question... does anyone in America or even anywhere else in Europe actually know a diagnostic genius? You know, someone on the level of Dr. House? Around here, doctors just stay stuck in their own little silos, barely looking up from their own specialty, and honestly, people end up getting terrible care because of it. It’s frustrating. If anyone knows of—or has even heard rumors about—a real diagnostician out there, please let me know. It would be a massive help.
Scott Allen10 Scott Allen10 Regular
315 messages
joined Jun 2005
#6 ·
Honestly, this thread isn't even meant for the Health section. To be real with you guys, the whole topic feels kind of pointless anyway since it doesn't really lead anywhere.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads