CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › New superbugs resistant to all antibiotics are a threat to civilization

New superbugs resistant to all antibiotics are a threat to civilization

Started by Donna Ramos10 · · 👁 4 views · 5 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Donna Ramos10melloworca6nimbleeagle18Patrick Young2Scott Allen10
Donna Ramos10 Donna Ramos10 NewcomerOP
3 messages
joined Nov 2011
#1 ·
The esteemed scientist Magnus Unemo has uncovered a new strain of bacteria that could potentially claim the lives of as many as 65 million people in the near future. This particular bacterium is resistant to every known medication and is spreading at an alarming rate. It all began when a physician in Kyoto diagnosed a patient—a sex worker—with gonorrhea and prescribed a course of cephalosporins, feeling quite certain that this standard treatment would handle such a common infection. Unfortunately, the culprit, *Neisseria gonorrhoeae*, had other plans... it simply refused to yield. It turns out we are dealing with a new strain known as H041, a superbug variant of gonorrhea that has proven entirely resistant to all antibiotics. With H041 cases already being documented among men in Norway, scientists are deeply concerned that this unstoppable, antibiotic-resistant strain might soon sweep across the entire globe. A string of lethal mutants...

Of course, this specific superbug is merely one in a growing parade of deadly mutants currently making their way across the world without any sign of slowing down. Perhaps the most infamous of the bunch is undoubtedly MRSA, a strain of staph that typically resides harmlessly on the skin or in the noses of healthy individuals, yet becomes a nightmare once it manages to breach the bloodstream or penetrate deep tissue, which occasionally leads to rather grim outcomes... What makes MRSA so uniquely dangerous is its stubborn refusal to respond to most antibiotics, including methicillin. It tends to spread through contaminated medical instruments or open wounds, and as our diagnostic and therapeutic procedures become more invasive, the risk of catching these hospital-acquired infections seems to climb right along with them. A study published back in 2007 in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) indicated that MRSA was responsible for nearly 19,000 deaths annually among Americans, a mortality rate in the US that actually surpassed even AIDS at the time. Over in Europe, MRSA claims about 25,000 lives every year. Here in the States, hospital-acquired infections affect roughly 50,000 people annually, with about one percent of those unfortunate souls meeting a fatal end, which keeps us right in line with the European average... The brunt of these hospital infections is felt most heavily by urology patients, accounting for 40 percent of cases, and those undergoing bowel surgery, which sits at around 25 percent.
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#2 ·
Nothing new here; we’re just seeing more of these bacteria everywhere. Honestly, if people would stop sprinting to the doctor every time they have a sniffle, and if doctors would quit being under so much pressure to prescribe antibiotics for every single kid who walks through the door, maybe things wouldn't be this bad.

But hey, let's just keep going down this path. We can all just die collectively from a basic case of pneumonia because every antibiotic we have left will be useless.
nimbleeagle18 nimbleeagle18 Newcomer
1 message
joined Oct 2011
#3 ·
From everything I’ve gathered through various stories, dealing with MRSA seems to be a total roll of the dice. For some, it’s a minor nuisance; for others, it’s a nightmare; and for a few, it’s straight-up fatal. It’s all incredibly individual—even how antibiotics actually react to it varies from person to person. Some people kick it to the curb, while others... well, they don't. One thing that really trips me up, though: if MRSA is supposedly only a killer when your immune system is trashed or when it hits your bloodstream and bones via an open wound, how does it manage to take down someone who was perfectly healthy? Like, someone who wasn't even in a hospital or recovering from surgery before this hit them? What are regular, healthy people doing wrong that lets this monster get the upper hand?
Patrick Young2 Patrick Young2 Member
31 messages
joined Jan 2019
#4 ·
Look, don't sweat it

The healthiest people are usually the ones who die the hardest
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#5 ·
nimbleeagle18 said:From everything I’ve heard through various stories, MRSA is hit-or-miss. For some, it’s manageable; for others, it’s a death sentence. It’s all highly individual—even how antibiotics react to it varies. Some people kick it successfully, while for others, it’s the end of the line. One thing bugs me, though: if MRSA is only a threat when your immune system is shot or when it hits the bloodstream via an open wound, how does it kill someone who was perfectly healthy before? Someone who wasn't even hospitalized or recovering from surgery? What are average, healthy people doing wrong that lets this beast overpower them?


Any bacterium is a nightmare once it hits the bloodstream. It can trigger sepsis, which is incredibly dangerous and kills a lot of people.
Scott Allen10 Scott Allen10 Regular
315 messages
joined Jun 2005
#6 ·
I think my colleague hit the nail on the head here, honestly—there’s really no reason to go around scaring everyone by just copy-pasting news articles everywhere.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads