Politics: Discussion on Eric Adams, post deletions, and insults

Hey there,

Regarding the thread about Eric Adams—it seems insults directed at Bill Clinton are being permitted. To address my actual points and arguments, he first responded with a totally "logical" claim that I’m just some drunk, then moved on to nitpicking my health, and finally called me a piece of trash... well, let's just say he was being incredibly disrespectful...

The moderator active during that stretch basically gave him a green light to keep going before eventually deleting everything without handing out any sanctions...

And to top it all off, they leave this trolling little post behind

"Go ahead, find where anyone on this thread actually claimed the numbers were dropping because of widespread theft.
Find that specific quote and post it here, and if you can, I'll personally ban myself from this forum for six months.

There's my offer—take it or just stop babbling, assuming your medical condition even allows for that much coherent speech."

And that's where things get weird...

The kicker is that my response to that post keeps getting wiped out, simply because I am clearly and logically providing exactly what the user asked for—fulfilling his own demand to self-ban...

So, despite having the facts on my side, my posts get deleted while the insults stay up...

>
Furthermore, it’s pretty interesting how my content gets scrubbed, yet the post where this guy attacks my physical health—which is a direct violation of the site rules—is left untouched...

Is the issue that the moderator is playing footsie with this guy who’s busy defending Eric Adams, or is it something else entirely?

And when exactly is that self-ban happening? Since the guy himself demanded proof regarding the discussion on declining housing numbers and corruption—just half an hour after he wrote that those topics were being discussed...

Adam Collins4 said:Hey there,

Regarding the thread about Eric Adams—it seems insults directed at Bill Clinton are being permitted. To address my actual points and arguments, he first responded with a totally "logical" claim that I’m just some drunk, then moved on to nitpicking my health, and finally called me a piece of trash... well, let's just say he was being incredibly disrespectful...

The moderator active during that stretch basically gave him a green light to keep going before eventually deleting everything without handing out any sanctions...

And to top it all off, they leave this trolling little post behind

"Go ahead, find where anyone on this thread actually claimed the numbers were dropping because of widespread theft.
Find that specific quote and post it here, and if you can, I'll personally ban myself from this forum for six months.

There's my offer—take it or just stop babbling, assuming your medical condition even allows for that much coherent speech."

And that's where things get weird...

The kicker is that my response to that post keeps getting wiped out, simply because I am clearly and logically providing exactly what the user asked for—fulfilling his own demand to self-ban...

So, despite having the facts on my side, my posts get deleted while the insults stay up...

>
Furthermore, it’s pretty interesting how my content gets scrubbed, yet the post where this guy attacks my physical health—which is a direct violation of the site rules—is left untouched...

Is the issue that the moderator is playing footsie with this guy who’s busy defending Eric Adams, or is it something else entirely?

And when exactly is that self-ban happening? Since the guy himself demanded proof regarding the discussion on declining housing numbers and corruption—just half an hour after he wrote that those topics were being discussed...

First of all, boo-hoo!
Secondly, please act with some decency and remove the signature containing my post—a post that offends absolutely no one—which you seem to find sufficient grounds to drag me through the mud as if I were some fifth column for the Republican Party.
Thirdly, boo-hooooooo!
Fourthly, you really ought to look into your own health matters.

fadedgull6 said:First of all, boo-hoo!
Secondly, please act with some decency and remove the signature containing my post—a post that offends absolutely no one—which you seem to find sufficient grounds to drag me through the mud as if I were some fifth column for the Republican Party.
Thirdly, boo-hooooooo!
Fourthly, you really ought to look into your own health matters.

🤣

The group that was busy insulting me and dragging my family into a debate about medical conditions... hahaha, please...

And honestly, that signature tells everyone exactly who you are—nothing but FBI-style lies and cheap tricks wherever you go. It’s no surprise you’re jumping to defend someone just like yourself, someone who, much like you, has been absolutely demolished by actual arguments...

Just imagine—if I'm really all that, even with my health being a complete wreck, then what does that say about you two when someone like me just steamrolls your logic into the ground?

Now, get lost, you clown.

What’s the deal here?

It’s funny how people get all worked up about labeling someone a liberal just because I sent a quick message—total overkill, really—but when someone turns around and calls me a health hazard and a drunk, suddenly that’s perfectly fine...

They actually went ahead and wiped out my comment where I was saying I totally agreed with the first part of what @kvasteriksa wrote—I was just trying to add some extra food for thought of my own. I wasn't out there insulting Eric Adams or anyone else, for crying out loud.

Is he still dodging questions?

Charles Carter4 said:They actually went ahead and wiped out my comment where I was saying I totally agreed with the first part of what @kvasteriksa wrote—I was just trying to add some extra food for thought of my own. I wasn't out there insulting Eric Adams or anyone else, for crying out loud.

So, the "moderator" slapped me with a ban based on a deleted post that was probably live for all of two minutes...

And sure, it was just a total "coincidence" that I happened to hit the exact point threshold required for a ban...

And yeah, there’s been a warning pinned to this thread since October 4th telling people not to get personal with one another...

But you still have this crowd of Tesla fanboys running wild—it’s been days, and not a single moderator has handed out a damn card...

It’s always the same old story: if you aren't constantly sucking up to everything, suddenly you're labeled a Republican Party hack, or some bigoted troll, or whatever other nonsense they throw at you...

How does that even work? Seriously, how?

And why is anyone just letting this slide?

Why does this place let the Kiss Me nonsense stay up while they scrub any actual, reasoned rebuttals that call out those lies?

Why is she allowed to go full ad hominem on everyone, yet her replies just vanish into thin air?

So, I guess calling people trolls and just straight-up lying to their faces is perfectly fine now, right? Just a regular Tuesday for some folks.

Here’s my response—where I actually asked for evidence to back up those lies and tried to debunk her nonsense regarding the supposed cooperation between the NO and MIT—but apparently, the mods are busy scrubbing any mention of it...

It’s honestly pathetic watching the moderation team play favorites and suck up to the usual suspects. Look, comrades, you can try to bury the truth if you want, but those days are long gone. You can't stop reality.