CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Locke (2014)

Locke (2014)

Started by James White11 · · 👁 5 views · 33 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants James White11Jason Diaz5Rachel Ortiz33James Garcia50Jamie Turner80Terry Scott34cosmiclynx57Paul Anderson7analogbear40Brandon Fox2Rachel Doyle3Jack Murphy5boldeagle3Bryan Taylor9copperdriver40Jesse Watson37Amanda Robinson4Jason Wood6
James Garcia50 James Garcia50 Active Member
137 messages
joined Oct 2014
#21 ·
Terry Scott34 said:Whatever. I wasn't offended, I just thought it was funny...

No. Again—what does that even have to do with anything? It’s not like you haven't seen a director totally butcher a great idea before, right? 😁

daaa, Mark Strong! 👋 I honestly can't picture Hiddleston in that role at all...
Hardy is fine, but he just didn't quite click for me...

I did, but I’m always hoping they won't. Killing off a baby is the cheapest, most low-brow way to grab attention, and I'm glad he didn't take that route.
Brandon Fox2 Brandon Fox2 Member
32 messages
joined Sep 2008
#22 ·
It’s one of those movies centered mostly on just one actor, kind of like Buried or Phone Booth. I wouldn't say I'm a huge fan of that specific genre, but Hardy is always a solid choice!
Rachel Doyle3 Rachel Doyle3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Aug 2014
#23 ·
Honestly, the movie was a total wash, and the ending? Even worse... just a complete waste of an hour and a half of my life.
Jack Murphy5 Jack Murphy5 Active Member
59 messages
joined Feb 2014
#24 ·
This movie is actually quite good. Even though it’s essentially just one actor delivering information through phone conversations, I didn't find it boring at all. Hardy is excellent.

8/10
boldeagle3 boldeagle3 Active Member
128 messages
joined Jan 2004
#25 ·
8/10

A truly stellar film. I am genuinely relieved with how the ending played out—even if my mind was racing through a dozen different scenarios while watching. To be honest, most of those alternatives felt like they would have been absolute clichés... you know, the typical Hollywood tropes like a sudden car accident, some tragic newborn tragedy, or the police pulling him over just to drag him into a station on some flimsy pretext... none of that happened, thank God.

It’s funny, really... you can have all the massive resources in the world at your disposal and still end up churning out total trash, like *Avatar* or that butchering of *The Hobbit* they did in three parts. Or, you can take the entire weight of the world and squeeze it into a single car, resting it entirely on the shoulders of one actor, and create something this powerful. My deepest respect to them.
Bryan Taylor9 Bryan Taylor9 Member
43 messages
joined Nov 2013
#26 ·
boldeagle3 🙂

You hit the nail on the head. If I wasn't already a fan of Tom Hardy, he's officially won me over now. 😍
boldeagle3 boldeagle3 Active Member
128 messages
joined Jan 2004
#27 ·
Bryan Taylor9 said:boldeagle3 🙂

You hit the nail on the head. If I wasn't already a fan of Tom Hardy, he's officially won me over now. 😍

🙂
As for my own take—it's not that I haven't liked Hardy before, per se—it’s just that I haven't sat through one of his films where he truly steals the show until recently... For me, Locke Hardy earns all the credit here. 😬

(I'd also suggest checking out The Drop)
copperdriver40 copperdriver40 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jan 2015
#28 ·
An excellent film, much like Tom Hardy, who absolutely kills it in every single role. Honestly, some people are just going to hate this because they can't handle it, but this is raw reality—it's the kind of thing that could happen to anyone at any moment.
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 Regular
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#29 ·
Man, what an incredible movie. It’s got this vibe where it feels so simple and slow-paced, yet somehow stays incredibly intense and packed with substance at the same time? I actually watched it about five or six days ago, and honestly, I’m already thinking about giving it another spin soon because it just stuck with me so much.
The cinematography is just next level, you know? Even though we’re mostly focused on just one character while everyone else is basically just a voice in the background, my head was spinning with all these vivid mental images of what else was happening. Like, that scene where the guy from the construction site starts running? In my mind, I was picturing him sprinting down some dark, gritty alleyway or a shadowy street—man, that imagery is just powerful.

Hardy absolutely crushed it, no joke, he totally killed that performance.

The whole concept is just brilliant; I mean, we basically get to experience one single night—well, a specific chunk of one night—in this guy's life, and it was just fantastic.

My rating: 8/10
Jesse Watson37 Jesse Watson37 Member
13 messages
joined Apr 2018
#30 ·
You hit the nail on the head. A movie like this requires a specific touch. Tom Hardy deserves a lot of credit for making it work. It’s straightforward—it doesn't overcomplicate things—but it still keeps you on the edge of your seat.
Amanda Robinson4 Amanda Robinson4 Active Member
159 messages
joined Nov 2014
#31 ·
If a movie actually feels alive, it’s never going to be boring. Just finished watching, and man, Hardy really stepped up to the plate with this challenge—he absolutely crushed it.

I mean, I wasn't even surprised by how they brought his father into the mix. To me, that connection is everything... it ties his whole current mess to the stuff he's trying so hard to spare his kid from experiencing... you know?

Plus, throwing in those themes of love... yeah. It was really well done. 🙂
Amanda Robinson4 Amanda Robinson4 Active Member
159 messages
joined Nov 2014
#32 ·
Just wanted to share a slightly more in-depth look at this one 🙂
... turns out there's way more to unpack!
Jason Wood6 Jason Wood6 Newcomer
1 message
joined May 2015
#33 ·
This movie is such a breath of fresh air... simple, feels incredibly real, actually worth watching. 8/10
boldeagle3 boldeagle3 Active Member
128 messages
joined Jan 2004
#34 ·
I’ve sat through this movie three times now.
The first time around, I gave it an 8 on IMDb.
The second viewing? A solid 9.
Now, having just finished it for the third time, I went back to IMDb and bumped it up to a perfect 10.

And yet, this entire discussion thread only has two pages... 😬

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads