#3341 ·
Lisa Ward52 said:Man, I honestly don't know what to say... At the first hospital, they told us the attending physician decided against surgery. Unfortunately, I didn't get a chance to catch the actual doctor; I was just talking to a resident who could tell me if there would be an operation or not, but I couldn't make sense of the logic behind any of it. That said, I am actually quite happy with that department. The resident wanted to talk to me whenever necessary, he’d check in with my dad before rounds, they let me stay by my father's side at any hour, and the nurses were accessible and friendly. The attending is highly respected here in the States.
But I still can't wrap my head around the logic of radiation without surgery.
Look, I'm no doctor, and I shouldn't be sticking my nose into their business, but you do a little digging, you read up...
At the second hospital, they're saying they don't understand why surgery wouldn't be done. And the doctor there is also highly regarded.
He actually told me everything is okay—not "okay" because it's cancer, obviously, but that things aren't nearly as grim as we first understood from that first hospital.
So now I'm stuck with two completely different opinions from two very good doctors. Just great. 🙂
I'm leaning more toward the surgery, to get out that part that has metastasized to the lymph nodes. I think we're going to go with that option after all.
A lot of this comes down to individual experience. This first doctor probably has more experience using radiation to shrink a tumor so the targets pull back (since they're close), allowing whatever remains to be surgically removed later. In those cases, the procedure is much less invasive. But in your dad's case, that seems like a poor choice to me simply because waiting a month just to get in line for radiation makes the whole concept fall apart.
The second doctor clearly has a better relationship with the surgeons, and since the surgeon is excellent, his experiences are great too. The procedure itself might be more invasive, but let them remove whatever can be removed now, then move on to radiation and the rest of the treatment with some peace of mind.
To put it bluntly, this second option is far more acceptable to me, regardless of how invasive it is.
