Angela Wright said:Nice.😍
Can you actually be specific about the diagnosis and what steps were taken? Honestly, I feel like we’re all just lacking some positive stories around here.
Honestly, I’m also a huge fan of d. S. Schreiber’s book. I’ve posted about it here before and gave it my seal of approval. It’s just a shame it wasn't around back when I actually needed it—it would've saved me so much wasted time and helped me stop spinning my wheels and focus on what actually matters.
There’s a ton of books out there about cancer and nutrition, but honestly, most of them are garbage. That’s why I rely on the Amazon.com rating system to gauge quality. If I stumble upon a book with reviews similar to the two I mentioned in my original post, that’s when I actually pick it up. In those reviews, you see countless people sharing how much these books actually helped them, while almost nobody complains that they didn't work. So why wouldn't you trust that? It's just twenty bucks. Most people have no clue about these resources or the fact that you can actually take matters into your own hands. They’re clueless. They just blindly trust whatever their doctor tells them, and that’s exactly how they end up becoming just another statistic. This is why forums like this are such a vital tool for staying educated. 🙂
My mom ended up in emergency surgery because of some abdominal pain. Not once did anyone even bring up the possibility of a tumor. They didn't even bother with a biopsy before cutting her open. Just went straight in. Total amateurs. The surgeon looked like he was barely thirty. They pulled out this massive tumor, but after running tests, it turns out it wasn't the primary one. The actual source? Never found. A few months after the surgery, her markers spiked like crazy. Right after everything went south, I started digging through medical texts and journals—my English is good enough to actually make sense of them. Mom eventually went over to Austria for a PET-CT scan, but they still couldn't locate the primary site. One oncologist actually told her she only had three months left to live. Honestly? I think that botched diagnosis cost her years of life right then and there.
Then she slowly started actually listening to me and watching what she eats. Because honestly, who knows better than a white-haired old lady? Nobody. I’m not going to sit here and lecture you on what’s good for you and what isn't. Go buy a book; there are plenty out there. Anything I say here would just be surface-level and useless anyway. On top of the diet, she’s taking a ton of supplements too. That part is huge. I usually grab everything through eBay. It’s easily the cheapest way to go—honestly, it's less than half the price of what you'll find in American grocery stores, especially for certain stuff. If you guys actually want the links, let me know.
Why aren't nutrition and supplements integrated into standard cancer protocols? It boils down to two things:
Proving a substance is actually a medicine costs a fortune—we're talking anywhere from $500 million to $1.2 billion. Big Pharma only bites if they're looking at a brand-new, patented invention. You can't patent something that just exists in nature. If anyone can manufacture a natural substance, why would a massive corporation sink billions into it just to have everyone else undercut them immediately? It’s financial suicide.
Look, there are tons of substances in food and supplements that actually help cancer patients. We aren't just talking about two or three things here—we’re talking hundreds. Each one plays a part, and some are massive contributors. Even better? A lot of them work synergistically. That means when you take them together, the effect is way stronger than if you just took them individually. It's basically 1+1 equals more than 2.
👋