CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Midnight Meat Train (2008)

Midnight Meat Train (2008)

Started by Scott Reyes84 · · 👁 5 views · 19 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Scott Reyes84wiredtiger10Samuel Ortiz3mellowtrucker44briskbison28Amanda Morris3Anthony Baileynimblemarlin6Hannah Baker23granitehound19silentridge8Rebecca Bennett2gentlebadger88Harold KellyDavid Fisher9quietdriver3wiredeagle5Ryan Wilson2
Scott Reyes84 Scott Reyes84 MemberOP
14 messages
joined Feb 2008
#1 ·
I absolutely loved it! Vinnie is such a legend, right? I ended up getting myself all decked out in similar gear immediately! It actually gave me some serious H.P. Lovecraft vibes too, don't you think? 😁
wiredtiger10 wiredtiger10 Member
48 messages
joined Feb 2008
#2 ·
I downloaded it the other day, but it was in some random language—can't even understand it. I gotta find the English version, but honestly, from the few minutes I did manage to watch, it looks awesome.
Samuel Ortiz3 Samuel Ortiz3 Active Member
57 messages
joined Apr 2007
#3 ·
This movie is absolute garbage. The plot? Total nonsense—just complete and utter nonsense. And those idiots over at AMC Theatres are out here promoting it like it’s some big-time crime thriller. Good God!
mellowtrucker44 mellowtrucker44 Member
16 messages
joined Jun 2007
#4 ·
I'm definitely adding this to my watchlist. Aside from the fact that it’s based on a story by Stephen King, I'm mostly hyped because it marks the big Hollywood directorial debut for James Wan...

And honestly, Wan is such a talent; he basically made his name with his own take on the Evil Dead style— VERSUS.

Ever since then, I've had my eye on his work, so I'm pretty stoked to finally catch MMT.
briskbison28 briskbison28 Member
11 messages
joined Mar 2008
#5 ·
Watched it yesterday. What a disaster!
The beginning actually felt somewhat promising... but those last 15 minutes? I was laughing out of pure frustration.

All in all, if you can avoid it, don't 🙂
Amanda Morris3 Amanda Morris3 Member
25 messages
joined Nov 2008
#6 ·
62% on Rotten Tomatoes
I guess that means it earned a mediocre score and managed to land somewhere in the "fresh" category, if you can even call it that!

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1000...ht_meat_train/

👍
Anthony Bailey Anthony Bailey Regular
271 messages
joined May 2003
#7 ·
This movie has scenes way more brutal than Hostel—an eyeball getting popped out from a hammer blow, someone biting a guy's tongue off and eating it, blood splattering right onto the lens... gross.

I'm not really into sci-fi or horror, so the movie wasn't exactly my cup of tea.
But all things considered, it's watchable. It isn't nearly as bad as Hostel.

Honestly, I'm surprised Brooke Shields actually agreed to be in a flick like this.
☕
nimblemarlin6 nimblemarlin6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Aug 2012
#8 ·
This was an incredible watch—just beautifully shot from start to finish. It’s a serious, uncompromising piece of horror that definitely isn't for everyone, though—you have to be in the right headspace for it. If I had to compare the way the story unfolds to anything else, I’d say the tone feels a lot like The Mist. Honestly, this is easily the best adaptation of a Stephen King story we've seen yet.
Hannah Baker23 Hannah Baker23 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Dec 2009
#9 ·
I’m giving this a -750 on the scale of American attempts to stave off a recession😁

It's a movie. I don't know. In my entire life, I have never felt such regret over money as I did for those $10 spent on a ticket😢
The entire time, I was thinking about how much I’d love to take that hunk of junk and swing it at the producer, the writer, and the absolute moron who approved the budget for this garbage.

I don't know what's more pathetic. The ending featuring aliens, heart-ripping, and tongue-eating? Or the poorly executed sex scenes clearly added just to give it some "realism" and boost viewership? Or maybe Brooke Shields' desperate acting. Fake, fake, fake.

I'll never get over this film X
nimblemarlin6 nimblemarlin6 Active Member
228 messages
joined Aug 2012
#10 ·
Hannah Baker23 said:I’d give it negative 750 mil—basically what the US government spends trying to bail us out of a recession.😁

I don't know. It’s just... I have never in my entire life felt so much regret over money spent $10on a movie ticket.😢
The whole time, I was just sitting there thinking about how much I’d love to take that producer, the screenwriter, and whatever top-level moron approved the budget for this garbage, and just smack them all with a heavy object.

I mean, I don't even know which part is more pathetic. Is it the ending with the aliens, the heart-ripping, and the tongue-eating? Or maybe the poorly executed sex scenes they clearly threw in just to try and add some "realism" to boost viewership? Or is it Brooke Shields' desperate acting? Fake, fake, fake.

I am never going to get this movie out of my head, X.


🙂 Like I said, it isn't for everyone. The theater was actually pretty packed, which surprised me. A few rows ahead of me, people were practically shouting halfway through—complaining about what kind of movie this was, saying they couldn't follow anything, asking what was even happening...
Personally, I actually enjoyed that they didn't make those typical Hollywood compromises just to make Barker's story more "accessible" to the masses. And hey, Steven Seagal is basically the most iconic cinematic killer lately.
Anthony Bailey Anthony Bailey Regular
271 messages
joined May 2003
#11 ·
Maybe the one silver lining here is that it gets the message out there about people cutting back on meat.
😳 😁
granitehound19 granitehound19 Member
24 messages
joined Aug 2010
#12 ·
I honestly only sat through this movie because of Vinny; if he hadn't been in it, I probably would have turned it off halfway through... Everything else was just a total disaster, aside from maybe one or two decent gore scenes. The rest of the cast was subpar, the soundtrack was completely forgettable, and there was zero atmosphere—the ending felt more like a parody than an actual horror flick. All in all, it was a tedious, mediocre mess. Because of Vinny 4/10, I’m giving it this, otherwise the rating would be significantly lower.
silentridge8 silentridge8 Active Member
231 messages
joined Jun 2007
#13 ·
Scott Reyes84 said:I absolutely loved it! Vinny rules! I was hooked from the jump! + It also gave me some serious H.P. Lovecraft vibes! 😁

Same here.

Hannah Baker23 said:(...)
I don't know which is more pathetic—that ending with the aliens,(...)

They weren't aliens.

I enjoyed the movie; you can really feel that Barker atmosphere bleeding through. It feels like they managed to pull that off specifically through the cinematography. 🤔 I'm not usually a fan of gore, but with Barker involved—and I know how cliché that sounds—it actually works as part of the story; you understand why it's there. The only thing is, that little subplot with the cop could have been handled a bit better.
Rebecca Bennett2 Rebecca Bennett2 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Feb 2009
#14 ·
Pointless.
gentlebadger88 gentlebadger88 Active Member
87 messages
joined Dec 2009
#15 ·
Absolute masterpiece. And man, it is brutal as hell. 😁
Harold Kelly Harold Kelly Newcomer
2 messages
joined Nov 2009
#16 ·
I caught it the other day, and honestly, I wasn't a fan at all.
David Fisher9 David Fisher9 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2009
#17 ·
What a complete disaster. A total waste of cash. Honestly, they might have been better off just tossing the money into the street; at least then it would've actually done someone some good!
quietdriver3 quietdriver3 Regular
290 messages
joined Mar 2005
#18 ·
The most depressing part about all this is that this is actually the most faithful adaptation of a Barker story we've seen, yet the movie turned out so incredibly bland and mediocre. That camera shot racing through some underground CGI subway tunnel? Does everyone nowadays only have those Michael Bay visions when they try to make a horror flick? And what happened to the core theme of the story—about New York City being a place that lives off its own people? Did the director even bother reading the source material?

But since Barker actually signed on as a producer for this one, it’s pretty obvious he isn't exactly losing sleep over how bad it is. I guess I'm done trying to justify his choices. It feels like the guy who once bled the "Book of Blood" has long since lost his edge, and they just replaced him with this talentless clone. Either that, or sucking up to corporate types is just the ultimate creativity killer.
wiredeagle5 wiredeagle5 Member
12 messages
joined Feb 2009
#19 ·
The movie was absolute trash—a total disaster—and yet my buddy actually liked it enough to
I honestly don't get why he thought it was any good.
Ryan Wilson2 Ryan Wilson2 Regular
387 messages
joined Dec 2002
#20 ·
I caught it yesterday. What an incredible film. It’s pure, visceral, Barker-esque horror. Given how poorly previous adaptations of Barker's stories have turned out, this was a genuine shock to the system.

There is one specific moment that actually made me laugh, despite the fact that it takes place on a train crawling with bodies hanging from meat hooks; they end up standing face-to-face just like a classic Western standoff. 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads