CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Pirates of the Caribbean: Part 1 or 2?

Pirates of the Caribbean: Part 1 or 2?

Started by dustytrucker51 · · 👁 5 views · 27 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants dustytrucker51Andrew Harris7Ronald Bishopambertinker77AJames Ross10brisksailor3Charles Kern28boldlynx2Henry Anderson47Brian Foster2northernangler17granitewalker23ironeagle10George Green42mistyviper8analogskipper272driftinghawk512Dana Allen3Rebecca Evans64Taylor Howard36Frank Jackson5Gregory Flores3Raymond Cruz42 …
dustytrucker51 dustytrucker51 NewcomerOP
8 messages
joined Oct 2007
#1 ·
Part one hits because of the depth, plus it’s actually decent entertainment, but the second half? Total disaster. A complete waste of two and a half hours...
It wasn't even fun. The plot is hollow, the villains are weak, and the jokes are way more bottom-shelf than anything in the first part...not even going to list the rest.
Andrew Harris7 Andrew Harris7 Active Member
52 messages
joined Dec 2006
#2 ·
part one
Ronald Bishop Ronald Bishop Newcomer
8 messages
joined Mar 2007
#3 ·
I’d definitely go with the first one. But honestly, you really need to sit down and watch the second part a few times—maybe even two or three passes—to actually catch what's happening. There’s a mountain of clever details buried in there that you'll completely miss on a first viewing. Personally, I don't think the sequel is nearly as bad as everyone seems to love hating on it.
ambertinker77 ambertinker77 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jan 2007
#4 ·
I think I actually preferred the first part, just by a hair. To me, the second one felt a little bit slower, if I'm being honest. Still, I'm definitely on track to have the second part catch up to the first in terms of view counts soon enough.
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#5 ·
I haven't even checked out a single episode yet. Honestly, that kind of stuff just isn't really my thing... though, I guess I might give it a look eventually...
James Ross10 James Ross10 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jan 2007
#6 ·
I’m leaning toward the first one myself—it just feels a bit more solid, if that makes sense.
James Ross10 James Ross10 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jan 2007
#7 ·
Part 1
brisksailor3 brisksailor3 Member
32 messages
joined Jun 2006
#8 ·
I honestly find both versions compelling, though I have to say the villains in the first film were much more impactful 🙂
Charles Kern28 Charles Kern28 Member
24 messages
joined Jun 2009
#9 ·
Man, I love both movies! 😬 Though I’d still say the first one takes the cake since it's such a classic masterpiece, while the sequel feels a bit different—but those special effects? Totally mind-blowing. 😍
boldlynx2 boldlynx2 Member
17 messages
joined Nov 2006
#10 ·
😳 😳 😬 I caught the second installment while I was out in San Francisco, and honestly, the vibe and the way they handled things there just wasn't hitting the mark.
I can't say the movie itself was much better, either.
Henry Anderson47 Henry Anderson47 Active Member
94 messages
joined Aug 2004
#11 ·
The first one is definitely my pick. I think his sense of humor is just better, and he isn't nearly as hard to watch as the other guy. 🙂

The second one has some lines that honestly sound like they belong in a better movie, but man, there are so many gaps where people are just yawning. I know, I know—you aren't supposed to yawn when Johnny Depp is on screen 😁—but it’s still pretty bad. Plus, the plot feels kind of thin and those gross scenes are just too much. It doesn't even come close to the first one.
Brian Foster2 Brian Foster2 Active Member
78 messages
joined Mar 2007
#12 ·
I actually managed to sit through it twice! But honestly, I had to bail on the second attempt after just 20 minutes... It’s definitely a one-and-done kind of movie. You really have to stick to the first viewing if you want the full experience, otherwise, what's the point?
northernangler17 northernangler17 Member
49 messages
joined Oct 2006
#13 ·
I think the sequel is actually better. I don't know, the first one didn't really grab me at all when I watched it, but the second one was honestly pretty entertaining ( Johnny 😍 )
granitewalker23 granitewalker23 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Feb 2007
#14 ·
...I don't know, I think the first one was better than the sequel...though the second one wasn't half bad either. Honestly, I'm dying to see what they do with the next installment 😲
ironeagle10 ironeagle10 Newcomer
6 messages
joined May 2011
#15 ·
both
George Green42 George Green42 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Feb 2007
#16 ·
The first installment was quite impressive. The banter between the characters kept things lively, and there was a genuine sense of tension throughout.
The second part, however, was complete garbage. If it were up to me, I would have handled the direction much differently. Do you remember that scene where Captain Jack and some soldier are dueling inside a watermill that’s barreling through fields and forests?🤣 The sequel was clearly produced solely to chase a paycheck.
A Anonymous Veteran
3.6K messages
joined May 2005
#17 ·
That movie was a total disaster.
I mean, I’ve always had mixed feelings about Johnny Depp 😍, but even he couldn't save this one. And honestly, I was actually looking forward to it.
mistyviper8 mistyviper8 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Mar 2007
#18 ·
What’s everyone’s take on Pirates of the Caribbean?
analogskipper272 analogskipper272 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jul 2007
#19 ·
I found the first half absolutely captivating (especially those skeletal remains under the moonlight), and while the second part was decent enough, I was genuinely pleased to see the character from the opening act make an appearance again.
driftinghawk512 driftinghawk512 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Mar 2007
#20 ·
I honestly think both of them are pretty wonderful, though I suppose the first one might be a bit better, if you ask me!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads