#61 ·
seti said:the real issue is smokers constantly drifting into non-smoking zones in bars or restaurants (just look at how people act near the Mississippi River)—those boundaries are usually just some imaginary line in the air, so they're basically useless. then you've got social spots like hiking clubs where the battles get intense because smokers refuse to quit once they step inside. that's the crux of it. the second someone lights up in those areas, every non-smoker who's bothered by it is FORCED to head outside. the only other option is to sit there and just suck it up, which isn't really an option at all
Alright, I'm with you there, but I think it’s a simple fix—like, the responsibility lies with the bar or the lodge. As far as I know, there are actual "regulations" that define how those spaces should be partitioned
What I'm actually getting at is that it ANNOYS me when a non-smoker wanders into a smoking room, a designated smoking section in a restaurant, or a smoking car on a train and starts acting like a nuisance
Look, I've been in bars and places where smoking was BANNED and I NEVER lit up, okay? But if I sit down in a spot clearly marked "smoking area," I am going to light up, and I don't want non-smokers HARASSING me (if it’s a bar or a restaurant, please go bother the owner instead of me)—you feel me?
Another thing that bugs me is the massive hypocrisy—everyone judges smoking but treats alcohol like it's perfectly fine (I mean, alcohol ads aren't banned or anything). I'm a smoker, but even I think non-smokers can't be that biased and pretend alcohol isn't harmful—it is—for both the drinker and everyone around them (take it to the extreme—you can avoid me with a cigarette just by stepping a few feet away, but you can't avoid some drunk idiot speeding in a car 124 miles/you can't just dodge that (and btw, I don't want anyone to end up in a situation where they have to dodge someone like that))