CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Movie terminology glossary

Movie terminology glossary

Started by Terry Ramos60 · · 👁 7 views · 63 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Terry Ramos60copperrider70Carol Jackson45brightscout63Jose Miller17Terry Hernandez6Richard Hernandez13Grace Jackson11northerncrane4Jose Chase2Samuel Jones5Brian Wright51dustyscout53Frank Moore4Jason Chavez32Christian Sanchez44Nancy Green7Joshua Williams82Michelle Ward10Joseph Lee3wearygardener13
Terry Ramos60 Terry Ramos60 Active MemberOP
90 messages
joined Jan 2004
#21 ·
What about someone like Maloča? I was under the impression that he wasn't part of that primary tier of producers, though I must emphasize that this is merely my own assumption, as I lack any insider access or more granular details to confirm such a thing!
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#22 ·
Maria Peterson said:What about someone like Maloča? I assumed he wasn't part of that top tier of producers—but again, that’s just my assumption, since I don't have any insider info or anything.

Maloča gets his funding from either the Department of the Interior or PBS. If their payments are late, his fees are late too. Or—if they're being particularly slow—he just takes out a loan from the bank.
Terry Ramos60 Terry Ramos60 Active MemberOP
90 messages
joined Jan 2004
#23 ·
Well, look at this little producer! And here I was under the impression he was actually investing his own capital and pulling resources together from all over!
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#24 ·
Maria Peterson said:What kind of producer is that?! I thought he was investing his own cash and scouting talent elsewhere!

Let’s be real—why would they? Producers aren't enthusiasts; they're opportunists. They aren't crazy enough to sink their own capital into this, and they can't just go "scouting" around—nobody is handing out money to them. At most, you might see some product placement deals—trading goods for screen time—but actual cash? Not a chance.
Terry Ramos60 Terry Ramos60 Active MemberOP
90 messages
joined Jan 2004
#25 ·
Wait, are you actually suggesting that even in the States, producers don't invest their own capital?

(I was calculating the cost of replacing product placement with actual commercials in a film under the heading 'more expensive overall')
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#26 ·
Maria Peterson said:Wait—are you actually suggesting that producers in the States don't invest their own capital?

The US actually has a functioning market.

Maria Peterson said:(I was thinking of trading something for film placement under that "it costs more elsewhere" logic)

Sure—but we're talking about something trivial, like wallpaper. Something they'd use to cover the blinds at Paramount Pictures studios. Or a producer might pocket the difference to renovate his own house—because apparently, he needs it. But no one’s going to try to pay a talent with wallpaper instead of a paycheck.
Terry Ramos60 Terry Ramos60 Active MemberOP
90 messages
joined Jan 2004
#27 ·
I really wouldn't want to overstep my bounds here, especially since it's quite obvious that I don't fully grasp how all these moving parts work—wouldn't you agree with what Richard Hernandez13
says?
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#28 ·
Maria Peterson said:you can see I don't know how things work

You seem to emphasize that a bit too often—hmm, hmm, hmm... 🤔 😉
Samuel Jones5 Samuel Jones5 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jan 2006
#29 ·
A producer basically walks into an audition, stares at a girl's chest, and decides right then and there if she’s got the right size. If he happens to fall for some petite girl with a smaller bust, he won't even cast her—claiming it just doesn't "fit his creative vision" for the movie. Honestly? It makes the producer look less like an artist and more like some kind of twisted plastic surgeon.🙂
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#30 ·
So, how does the whole co-production scene actually work?
I was wondering if there's any way for us to tap into foreign film funds—and if so, what kind of hoops we'd have to jump through to make that happen?
Terry Ramos60 Terry Ramos60 Active MemberOP
90 messages
joined Jan 2004
#31 ·
northerncrane4 said:Don't you think you emphasize that a bit too frequently, hmm? 🤔 😉

It's simply because I often feel as though I am asking foolish questions!
Oh, I know, I know—they always say there are no stupid questions, but really...
Brian Wright51 Brian Wright51 Newcomer
1 message
joined Dec 2008
#32 ·
So, what's actually the difference between a director and a "redatelj"?
To me, the term "redatelj" sounds like some weird linguistic leftover from the North America, but I see people using it all the time here, so maybe I'm just being overly picky.
dustyscout53 dustyscout53 Regular
310 messages
joined Dec 2005
#33 ·
This isn't even about the movie, but whatever. Does anyone know what you call those little text crawls or banners that pop up on TV during news segments?

"Special news bulletin regarding the arrest of Ante Gotovina coming up in 10 minutes."

Know what I mean?
Jose Chase2 Jose Chase2 Active Member
196 messages
joined Sep 2008
#34 ·
You’re actually serious. Some kind of info-something 😬
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#35 ·
dustyscout53 said:This isn't really about the movie, but I was wondering anyway—is there a specific name for those little text overlays you see scrolling across the screen during TV broadcasts for news updates or announcements?

I'm pretty sure the term you're looking for is telop. 🤔
Terry Ramos60 Terry Ramos60 Active MemberOP
90 messages
joined Jan 2004
#36 ·
maks said:but what is the actual distinction between a director and a filmmaker?
The term "director" feels a bit politically charged to me, almost like a relic from certain regional political eras, yet it seems to be used so frequently in our local circles that perhaps I am overthinking it.

There truly is no difference at all!
From what I have been told by those in the industry, both terms are perfectly valid within American English usage, and you can use whichever one feels more natural to you in conversation.
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#37 ·
mizanscenista

🤣
brightscout63 brightscout63 Active Member
98 messages
joined Apr 2004
#38 ·
What the hell is up with that (I) after an actor's name?!!
Like this
Richard Hernandez13 Richard Hernandez13 Regular
269 messages
joined May 2004
#39 ·
🤣

It looks like there’s actually another person out there sharing the name Chris Rock on IMDb. Those Roman numerals tucked behind the name are just there so the system can tell those two different folks apart.
brightscout63 brightscout63 Active Member
98 messages
joined Apr 2004
#40 ·
Richard Hernandez13 said:🤣

So basically, there's just another dude named Chris Rock in the IMDb database. Those Roman numerals are just there so you don't mix up two different guys with the same name.

Dammit, I didn't realize the answer was that obvious. 😢
Thanks.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads