Carol Myers3 said:Your analogy is fundamentally flawed.
What it is that you, myself, or anyone else knows is that he battled addiction for over twenty years, that he was a truly talented actor, and that he always presented himself with grace and a smile during interviews. That is the reality we recognize. It is frankly distasteful to see someone disparage a deceased individual in the manner that Padalecki does. I am certainly not disputing that his passing was senseless, but I choose to view him as an actor who, over the last two decades, actually contributed something meaningful to the film industry.
In my estimation, the comparison to a pedophile is completely off base. That is just my opinion. If you find it fitting, then fine.
Honestly, Padalecki knows exactly what he’s doing because he understands he has a devoted fanbase of young girls writing to him and following his every move. Every time someone steps up to moralize or cast stones at another person, they realize he knows how to play that game perfectly.
Not even slightly. I just forgot to mention that, theoretically, our guy hangs himself in a cell.
What we know—what I, you, or anyone else knows—is that he fought addiction for over 20 years, that he was a top-tier actor, and that he was always charming and upbeat in interviews. That’s the reality. And then people start talking trash about a deceased person just like Padalecki is doing. I'm not disputing that he left this world in a stupid way, but I look at him as an actor who actually managed to make something meaningful for the film industry over those last two decades.
Padalecki isn't trashing the actor at all. He just said it was stupid to throw life away for drugs. What’s so dramatic about that statement? Is he making stuff up? Well, like I said, pedophilia is also a disease. Let's say our theoretical subject struggled with that for twenty years too. Do we stay quiet about it, or do we bring it up?
In my opinion, the pedophile analogy is completely off base. That's just how I see it. If it works for you, fine.
Oh, wait—I still haven't gotten an answer to that. I guess the standards would be different then.
Man, Padalecki knows exactly what he's doing because he knows he has those fans out there who adore him, writing to him and all that. And every once in a while, someone comes along to moralize or spit on someone else. He knows how to play that game perfectly.
As someone already pointed out through pure deduction, it seems like Sam Winchester himself bothers you more than what was actually said.
Melissa Sanchez16 said:Of course you wouldn't adore him. I don't admire Hoffman for the kind of man he was. I admire him for his acting. I didn't know him as a person.
It's not about degradation; it's about judging him for his personal choices. But who is he to judge? I doubt he was even close to him. Like you said, he's talking about him as a human being. Honestly, if I actually knew the person, I'd be too embarrassed to write something like that. Who am I to judge?
Based on how you're talking, it sounds like you're from a tiny little town.🙂
I'm not even going to comment on the rest, otherwise I'll just end up insulting myself. Just two things: I really wonder if you'd say that if it happened to someone close to you.
And I'm not a fanboy. I don't admire Hoffman as a man, but as an actor, because that's the only version of him I know. Also, you could probably use a lesson in basic manners and maybe some grammar.😉
This keeps coming up... Yeah, I've been there. A friend of mine took his own life and left behind a wife and two kids. I said it was a stupid, cowardly move, regardless of whatever problems he was facing. And nobody branded me a heretic for saying it. In fact, his own family agreed. It wasn't that we were ignoring his pain or his struggles, but the final takeaway was that it was a cowardly way to escape his problems. Normal people deal with that reality every single day. It's just when actors are involved that everyone suddenly takes this high-and-mighty moral ground.