#41 ·
Nicholas Watson said:But seriously, how is it even supposed to be considered an original work when it’s just a direct sequel to 🤔
? It feels like such a total oxymoron, ☕
.
Personally, I’m just crossing my fingers that they lean heavily into the practical stuff—more killer makeup and insane costumes rather than just drowning everything in cheap CGI.
Knowing Burton, we're probably looking at a ton more crazy makeup work.
He doesn't look like one of those CGI-obsessed directors you see everywhere lately. Honestly, I think he's way more reliable sticking to that old-school filmmaking style that made him famous in the first place.
I’ll take a movie with incredible, high-quality makeup over a bunch of shaky, overstretched CGI any day of the week. Seriously, give me practical effects over digital nonsense every single time.
Roger Martin3 said:The whole thing doesn't sound half bad to me; I suppose I'll remain cautiously optimistic—we shall see. 😁
I'm always feeling pretty optimistic when it comes to his movies. 😁