CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › 28 Days Later

28 Days Later

Started by graniteangler10 · · 👁 5 views · 23 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants graniteangler10slyrider16driftingowl27Melissa Moore32Sophia Fox38slylynx8brightscout63ambercyclist14fadedsailor932blueranger13bluetrucker93feralgardener502Ryan Wilson2silentpilot6Gary Kelly8Noah Harris50Michelle Gonzaleznorthernfalcon30
Michelle Gonzalez Michelle Gonzalez Member
38 messages
joined Nov 2004
#21 ·
In all seriousness:

I find myself genuinely puzzled by why American audiences didn't embrace *28 Days Later*. It feels as though the core message was largely missed. In truth, it is difficult to grasp the film unless you view it strictly through the lens of horror—especially within a culture as self-centered as ours here in the States.

The reason this movie resonated so deeply in the West is due to its spirit and its impeccable timing. When the protagonist stands before that wall in New York City, surrounded by a sea of flyers searching for the missing, it serves as a visceral association with 9/11. In that sense, *28 Days Later* was actually the first film to truly capture the post-9/11 world. That is why it hit home in the West as a horror story about threats bleeding out from the real world—things like Anthrax, the war in Iraq, 9/11, and the constant looming shadow of biological and enemy terrorism...
The average American doesn't dwell on these connections because they don't feel directly threatened by them, distracted as they are by their own daily, fundamental existential struggles...

To be fair, the film isn't without its flaws; it could have driven its point home and concluded much earlier, as that entire dreamlike sequence in the castle felt somewhat overindulgent and calculated.

However, the atmosphere is absolutely fantastic (particularly during that opening half hour), and the cinematography is nothing short of phenomenal. To watch the work of Anthony Dodd Mantle—arguably one of the greatest cinematographers alive, given his work on "Celebration" and "Dancer in the Dark"—is a masterclass. He managed to turn every technical limitation into a stylistic strength, from the shallow depth of field (which he uses beautifully to play with reflections) to the gritty, amateurish shutter speeds characteristic of consumer-grade cameras...
blueranger13 blueranger13 Member
15 messages
joined Feb 2004
#22 ·
Ethan Howard45..

Let's put it this way...
The movie is actually fantastic right up until they reach the mansion.

Once they step inside that estate, what started as a great film just turns into something incredibly dull and predictable—honestly, by the time the credits roll, you're left sitting there wondering why you even bothered watching it in the first place.
northernfalcon30 northernfalcon30 Active Member
90 messages
joined Sep 2003
#23 ·
Watched it yesterday, and man, it starts out freaking phenomenal (especially that part in deserted New York City, plus that killer soundtrack—anyone know who composed it?) right up until they hit the blockade at apartment 42. After that, it’s just pure déjà vu... or maybe the director just ran out of steam and had zero clue where to take it... just endless soldiers, "sticks," and girls waiting for them. Isn't that getting a little old?
And don't even get me started on the ending—total letdown!!

Honestly, if the movie didn't have such a killer first third (or first quarter?!), I wouldn't even be talking about it, but damn, what a wasted opportunity!

I'm not buying that comment about racism either; it doesn't hold water at all. Quite the opposite, actually.
Noah Harris50 Noah Harris50 Active Member
116 messages
joined Mar 2007
#24 ·
subc0mandante m0ris said:heroic...

Let's put it this way...
The movie is great right up until they hit the castle.

Facts.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads