I honestly don't know what to call her...

hollowmason64 said:...because when you don't know how to dodge specific questions (the ones that make you uncomfortable), you just resort to saying: "that's off-topic" 🤣
The reality is, this whole thing is about the mess this administration is making and how it's spreading, but I get the feeling that title might bother you guys, since you've all suddenly become so polite... 😳

I think there are quite a few of us here who actually got a direct message from @darkićin and her "blessing" to talk about this publicly. It’s not exactly a secret, either—it stems from that thread she started regarding forum exceptions...
...which you guys were all too quick to delete.
Why?
Do you honestly believe you can hide things and that most of this nonsense won't be seen? 🤣
And why is Daniel Ward87 now asking her to send proof via private message? Why is he trying to cover this up?
Trying to justify it by claiming the screenshots are fake? Great idea!
...if they really are fake, then prove it to her and to all of us right here so we can see she's just being dishonest 🤷
That's what people usually do—they try to "clean up" their reputation in public once someone calls them out in public...
...assuming they actually have a clean reputation to begin with, of course ☕

Just to be clear, most of what was written in her thread isn't even news to me; if anything, I could probably add quite a bit more to it😬. Honestly, I'm just fascinated by how some people can't see the moment their arrogance turns into pure stupidity 😍🤣

Oh, and one more thing—I'm curious to know what steps you've taken, or plan to take, to investigate all of this, what the sanctions will look like, and when we can expect an update? :zainteresirana forumašica:🍿

Daniel Ward87 said:The thread was nuked because she wrote a ton of stuff without providing any actual proof, even admitting herself that she just threw it all together quickly and didn't feel like digging further.

It's wild to me that you're questioning why I'm asking for evidence when you saw everything she wrote. She made plenty of claims without showing a single shred of proof, relying entirely on lines like "I have screenshots," "Do I really have to show them?" and "Tupelo bragged about it herself outside the forum." You can't expect the admins to act on that. What would you say if I told you I had screenshots proving life on Mars? Would you actually ask to see them, or would you just take my word for it?

Also, who's making excuses about the screenshots being fake? I mentioned that the admins have already dealt with users trying to submit Photoshopped Presidential messages to get others in trouble. I'm speaking generally here; it has nothing to do with her specifically. I haven't received any screenshots, and as far as I know, neither has Nice. All I know is that threads filled with these kinds of "claims" will be deleted and the users banned if there isn't tangible proof provided.

As for taking action, based on what? Just because she *said* she has evidence?

Furthermore, who’s claiming screenshots are fake? I already noted that administration has dealt with users trying to submit Photoshopped Presidential messages to demand punishments and things like that. I’m just playing it safe regarding this; it has nothing to do with her specifically. I haven't received any screenshots myself, and as far as I know, neither has Nice. What I do know is that any threads making these kinds of "claims" will be deleted and the users banned if there isn't tangible evidence provided.

hollowmason64 said:Look, if she couldn't just send a standard private message and had to use a link instead—and I can't even open links here--😢
darkić, please, get it together.🙂

Why did I get hung up on her specific claims?
Well, I mentioned that most of what she's saying is stuff I've already heard before. I didn't really dive into an argument about it because, for some parts, I don't have the receipts, and for others, I just didn't want to drag a third party into the mess. Plus, in a lot of cases, I just didn't think it was worth the energy to type out a response, knowing exactly how those threads usually end up.🤷

Furthermore, who’s claiming screenshots are fake? I already noted that administration has dealt with users trying to submit Photoshopped Presidential messages to demand punishments and things like that. I’m just playing it safe regarding this; it has nothing to do with her specifically. I haven't received any screenshots myself, and as far as I know, neither has Nice. What I do know is that any threads making these kinds of "claims" will be deleted and the users banned if there isn't tangible evidence provided.

This isn't about a user accusing XY-on; this is darkić pointing the finger at Nice and explicitly mentioning their mutual messages, where darkić claims Nice was sending her links to stuff from the fashion section. (And you're still suggesting she should have sent a private message reporting it 🤣).
The reality is that people saw the thread before it was wiped, and quite a few of us actually got direct messages about it, which I've already pointed out... basically, Pandora's box has been opened, if you want to put it that way. 🤷
So, what now?

By deleting the thread, you're actually just creating the perfect environment for conspiracy theories to grow.
Since she posted this publicly, you should either ask darkić to provide actual screenshots right here in the thread, or just hit her with a month-long ban... apply it to her, to me, or anyone else who ever does this.
If I were in Nice's shoes, I would be demanding that you restore the thread and prove it... nobody wants to be left looking guilty if they haven't done anything wrong!
It started out in public, so clean it up in public—do it for your own sake, if you're innocent and have nothing to hide. 🤷

What I really want to know is: what happens if this is true and she really was sending those things?
You have the "tools" to verify it...
..just like you have the tools to check if everything said about the mods creating piles of clone accounts and all the favoritism is true.
Do you actually plan on using any of those "tools," or are you just going to sit there waiting for more evidence?

hollowmason64 said:Look, if she couldn't just send a standard private message and had to use a link instead—and I can't even open links here--😢
darkić, please, get it together.🙂

Why did I get hung up on her specific claims?
Well, I mentioned that most of what she's saying is stuff I've already heard before. I didn't really dive into an argument about it because, for some parts, I don't have the receipts, and for others, I just didn't want to drag a third party into the mess. Plus, in a lot of cases, I just didn't think it was worth the energy to type out a response, knowing exactly how those threads usually end up.🤷

Furthermore, who’s claiming screenshots are fake? I already noted that administration has dealt with users trying to submit Photoshopped Presidential messages to demand punishments and things like that. I’m just playing it safe regarding this; it has nothing to do with her specifically. I haven't received any screenshots myself, and as far as I know, neither has Nice. What I do know is that any threads making these kinds of "claims" will be deleted and the users banned if there isn't tangible evidence provided.

This isn't about a user accusing XY-on; this is darkić pointing the finger at Nice and explicitly mentioning their mutual messages, where darkić claims Nice was sending her links to stuff from the fashion section. (And you're still suggesting she should have sent a private message reporting it 🤣).
The reality is that people saw the thread before it was wiped, and quite a few of us actually got direct messages about it, which I've already pointed out... basically, Pandora's box has been opened, if you want to put it that way. 🤷
So, what now?

By deleting the thread, you're actually just creating the perfect environment for conspiracy theories to grow.
Since she posted this publicly, you should either ask darkić to provide actual screenshots right here in the thread, or just hit her with a month-long ban... apply it to her, to me, or anyone else who ever does this.
If I were in Nice's shoes, I would be demanding that you restore the thread and prove it... nobody wants to be left looking guilty if they haven't done anything wrong!
It started out in public, so clean it up in public—do it for your own sake, if you're innocent and have nothing to hide. 🤷

What I really want to know is: what happens if this is true and she really was sending those things?
You have the "tools" to verify it...
..just like you have the tools to check if everything said about the mods creating piles of clone accounts and all the favoritism is true.
Do you actually plan on using any of those "tools," or are you just going to sit there waiting for more evidence?

hollowmason64 said:Look, if she couldn't just send a standard private message and had to use a link instead—and I can't even open links here--😢
darkić, please, get it together.🙂

Why did I get hung up on her specific claims?
Well, I mentioned that most of what she's saying is stuff I've already heard before. I didn't really dive into an argument about it because, for some parts, I don't have the receipts, and for others, I just didn't want to drag a third party into the mess. Plus, in a lot of cases, I just didn't think it was worth the energy to type out a response, knowing exactly how those threads usually end up.🤷

Furthermore, who’s claiming screenshots are fake? I already noted that administration has dealt with users trying to submit Photoshopped Presidential messages to demand punishments and things like that. I’m just playing it safe regarding this; it has nothing to do with her specifically. I haven't received any screenshots myself, and as far as I know, neither has Nice. What I do know is that any threads making these kinds of "claims" will be deleted and the users banned if there isn't tangible evidence provided.

This isn't about a user accusing XY-on; this is darkić pointing the finger at Nice and explicitly mentioning their mutual messages, where darkić claims Nice was sending her links to stuff from the fashion section. (And you're still suggesting she should have sent a private message reporting it 🤣).
The reality is that people saw the thread before it was wiped, and quite a few of us actually got direct messages about it, which I've already pointed out... basically, Pandora's box has been opened, if you want to put it that way. 🤷
So, what now?

By deleting the thread, you're actually just creating the perfect environment for conspiracy theories to grow.
Since she posted this publicly, you should either ask darkić to provide actual screenshots right here in the thread, or just hit her with a month-long ban... apply it to her, to me, or anyone else who ever does this.
If I were in Nice's shoes, I would be demanding that you restore the thread and prove it... nobody wants to be left looking guilty if they haven't done anything wrong!
It started out in public, so clean it up in public—do it for your own sake, if you're innocent and have nothing to hide. 🤷

What I really want to know is: what happens if this is true and she really was sending those things?
You have the "tools" to verify it...
..just like you have the tools to check if everything said about the mods creating piles of clone accounts and all the favoritism is true.
Do you actually plan on using any of those "tools," or are you just going to sit there waiting for more evidence?