Was Elon Musk gay?

Jerry Robinson56 said:(I don't even bother "following" you, honestly, even when I see your posts sitting at the bottom of a thread... I only engage when you happen to hit a nerve, especially after that rather emotional outburst of yours when we crossed paths on another topic right here regarding XmoronX, where another user actually grasped the true essence of my point—unlike you, who resorted to petty ad hominems and useless offers I have zero interest in, given that I laid out my proposal ages ago regarding whom exactly should be "returned," complete with a generous peace offering of my own) more extensively so the rest of the community can "see" what's happening without me just wasting space...

Is that so?
Let's just assume you're still nursing some jet lag, making you even more vapid than usual. 🤣

Casey Bennett said:really?
Let’s just assume you’re still nursing some heavy jet lag, which would certainly explain why your logic is even more incoherent than usual. 🤣

🙂 I was flying solo with an F.20 😁 but those suffixes aren't my concern... stay humble and merciful, right?

In all seriousness though... I respect the "rules," but one can only witness so much damage caused by such incompetent application before losing patience.

I won't dwell on it any longer; there have been enough pleasant moments of oblivion, and those are what truly endure.

Best,

Jerry Robinson56 said:Look, let’s get one thing straight right out of the gate: this isn't about me. This isn't a vanity project, nor am I looking for a pat on the back. My personal involvement is entirely secondary to the actual substance of the matter at hand.

This isn't even about the individual you so hypocritically suggested I "look up the meaning of" in your usual, moronic fashion. You're just talking nonsense.

Jerry Robinson56 As I have previously observed:
(...) I’m going to hold you accountable for this (...)

You can honestly spare me all your pathetic, mindless nonsense.

It feels like a constant loop where Elon Musk takes out @Manchild, then @Manchild takes out Elon Musk... they just keep swapping blows 🤔
Since Elon Musk literally invented alternating current, it’s obviously going to be gay... dammit, it's just basic logic 🤷😬🤣

He didn't just pull this out of thin air...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternating_current

The first alternator to produce alternating current was a dynamo electric generator based on Michael Faraday's principles constructed by the French instrument maker Hippolyte Pixii in 1832.

How on earth did you manage to link alternating current to those degenerates?
I have to be honest, I am completely unable to wrap my head around that analogy. It makes zero sense.

It looks like that post was edited after the fact, which makes things a little clearer, I suppose. 😬

Arthur Smith15 said:The subject isn't even about the individual you hypocritically suggested should "study the meaning of the expression" in your usual moronic fashion, you pointless windbag.

You clearly failed to grasp what Arthur Smith15 was getting at, which suggests the moderator doesn't actually comprehend his own posts and is simply employing his standard tactic of evasion. It is quite telling.
Essentially, I am addressing the blatant exclusivity of the moderator, who undoubtedly has an issue here.

There are far too many facts suggesting that Elon Musk held a certain orientation, ranging from his attitude toward women to everything beyond that. But perhaps that is to your personal liking.

Arthur Smith15 said:You can certainly spare me your pathetic nonsense.

Naturally, as always. You have plenty of your own, and then some.

I am certainly not the only one who believes that Manchild is correct.

stormybadger8 said:Well... damn, that is just elementary logic.🤷😬🤣

boldbison48 said:How on earth did you link AC current to those gays?
I honestly can't wrap my head around that comparison.

Exactly. That crowd runs on DC, not AC. Maybe if we were talking three-phase power, I'd get it. 😛

* My bad, mods. It's just peak trolling season.

Sarah Stewart72 said:Yes, I understood what she meant before the announcement; there was no need for bold text.
I still maintain that a warning isn't warranted here.
Thanks for letting me have an opinion.

However, I suspect that 'before the announcement' you didn't quite grasp what @Blaenkin actually meant.

You responded to her like this:

Sarah Stewart72 said:Sure, maybe, but even so, the decision seems too harsh regardless of who wrote it..

...which fails to address @Blaenkin's point entirely.

What is the logic behind your claim that

"the moderator's decision still feels too harsh, regardless of whether it was written by a gay or straight man"??

Specifically, regarding your assertion:

"Yeah, maybe @Manchild is gay, but even so to me the moderator's decision feels too harsh regardless of whether @Manchild wrote it as a gay or straight man."?

Your response would only make sense if you completely failed to understand @Blaenkin's post, assuming instead that the point was something like

"Hold on, @Manchild wrote that—he’s famous for never intending to offend anyone!"

Or rather:

"Hold on, @Manchild wrote that—he’s famous for being offensive!"

And you replied accordingly:

"Sure, maybe, but even so, the decision feels too harsh regardless of who wrote it."

(i.e., "the decision feels too harsh regardless of who wrote the message—whether it was one version of @Manchild or someone else"):

Sarah Stewart72 said:

Kate Evans48 said:...
Is that also the case here, where if Manchild writes it, it isn't considered a slur?

Sure, it’s possible. Still, the decision feels overly simplistic, regardless of who drafted it.

It’s not even about the specific sentence itself. The real issue here is that this blatant, useless piece of spam was posted by someone who has been told—essentially every single day for years now—exactly what constitutes spam and why it’s annoying. We have spent countless hours politely asking them to just stop, yet here we are. That’s why they got the ban hammer. It isn't just about the content; it's about the attitude. When someone has been warned more times than there are grains of sand on a beach, you can't just brush it off and say, "Oh, it's just one extra sentence, no big deal." The problem is the pattern of systematic spamming from a total manchild who clearly enjoys being a nuisance more than... Elon Musk. 😬