CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › 30 Nights of Paranormal Activity with The Devil Inside The Girl with The dragon tattoo (2013)

30 Nights of Paranormal Activity with The Devil Inside The Girl with The dragon tattoo (2013)

Started by cosmiclynx57 · · 👁 6 views · 41 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants cosmiclynx57Edward Price6Richard Wilson4frozenviper13Rachel Young3analogbison15Lisa Edwards12casualgullcoppersailor28Drew Sanchez82Harold Mitchell4Frank Chase6Angela Davis4silvertiger11boldfox88
Harold Mitchell4 Harold Mitchell4 Member
13 messages
joined Jun 2013
#21 ·
I caught a movie the other day, and honestly... it was just a complete disaster. If you're actually in the mood for a parody, though, you might want to check this out instead http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2243537/?ref_=sr_1. At least it’s watchable, and even decent in my book—actually, I quite enjoyed it 🙂
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 RegularOP
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#22 ·
Drew Sanchez82 said:This is bound to be just as ridiculous as the title itself 🤦

But honestly, it isn't—just give it a look and see for yourself!

I totally get why people steer clear because of that low IMDb rating, especially since I was doing the exact same thing until someone actually gave me a heads-up.
See, this is basically one of those "B-movie" style comedies/parodies, which is probably why the score is so low, but man, the way it pokes fun at all the latest big blockbusters is just spot on.
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#23 ·
cosmiclynx57 said:But honestly, it isn't—just give it a look and see for yourself!

I totally get why people steer clear because of that low IMDb rating, especially since I was doing the exact same thing until someone actually gave me a heads-up.
See, this is basically one of those "B-movie" style comedies/parodies, which is probably why the score is so low, but man, the way it pokes fun at all the latest big blockbusters is just spot on.

Ratings never really mess with me, but honestly, my experience with parodies over the last ten years has been pretty rough. Still, I'll give this one a shot.
Lisa Edwards12 Lisa Edwards12 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Jul 2012
#24 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Ratings never really mess with me, but honestly, my experience with parodies over the last ten years has been pretty rough. Still, I'll give this one a shot.

Don't bother. It really isn't worth your time.

The plot is non-existent, the jokes fall flat, the acting is just mediocre at best, and some of the scenes feel like they were thrown in there completely at random...

If you do decide to watch it, let me know what you think🙂
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#25 ·
Lisa Edwards12 said:Don't bother. It really isn't worth your time.

The plot is non-existent, the jokes fall flat, the acting is just mediocre at best, and some of the scenes feel like they were thrown in there completely at random...

If you do decide to watch it, let me know what you think🙂

Thanks for the heads up, I'll sleep on it.
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 RegularOP
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#26 ·
Look, at the end of the day, it’s all just a matter of taste, right? What one person thinks is absolute garbage, someone else might find totally entertaining, and honestly, that's just how it goes.

I’ll be the first to admit that I wasn't really into B-movies or those cheap mockbusters back in the day, but lately, I've been finding some surprisingly fun titles that are actually worth sitting down for.
Some people wouldn't touch a mockbuster with a ten-foot pole, no matter what, you know? And I know plenty of folks wonder why a guy like Cepo spends almost all his time watching low-budget horror flicks, but hey, I say it's all about what you enjoy!
Frank Chase6 Frank Chase6 Member
20 messages
joined Nov 2012
#27 ·
Was this supposed to be a parody of B-list horror movies? Or just a low-budget attempt at mocking horror in general? Look, I can appreciate a bad sitcom like *Scrubs*, but this was honestly unwatchable. If I were back home in the States, I’d probably be looking into a small claims suit against the filmmakers just to get my time back. It’s just a messy pile of everything—mostly just endless, nonsensical references to modern American nonsense—and don't even get me started on the "humor."

image
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 RegularOP
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#28 ·
Frank Chase6 said:Was this supposed to be a parody of B-list horror movies? Or just a low-budget attempt at mocking horror in general? Look, I can appreciate a bad sitcom like *Scrubs*, but this was honestly unwatchable. If I were back home in the States, I’d probably be looking into a small claims suit against the filmmakers just to get my time back. It’s just a messy pile of everything—mostly just endless, nonsensical references to modern American nonsense—and don't even get me started on the "humor."

image

I don't know about you guys, but I didn't see it as messy at all; honestly, everything felt pretty well laid out from start to finish.

How can you even say it's just thrown together when the whole thing is built directly on the foundation of >? It's parodying that specific movie by setting the whole plot in a house crawling with ghosts, and then they weave in those other movie nods using their main characters!
If it were actually "thrown together," the plot would be jumping all over the place from one second to the next without any rhyme or reason, right?

And look, since we aren't dealing with massive superstars like > or > or someone else of that caliber, I actually think the humor is spot on.
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 RegularOP
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#29 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Thanks for the heads up, I'll sleep on it.

Hey Richard Wilson4, so what was the final verdict—are you actually gonna watch it or what? 🤷
Lisa Edwards12 Lisa Edwards12 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Jul 2012
#30 ·
cosmiclynx57 said:I don't know about you guys, but I didn't see it as messy at all; honestly, everything felt pretty well laid out from start to finish.

How can you even say it's just thrown together when the whole thing is built directly on the foundation of >? It's parodying that specific movie by setting the whole plot in a house crawling with ghosts, and then they weave in those other movie nods using their main characters!
If it were actually "thrown together," the plot would be jumping all over the place from one second to the next without any rhyme or reason, right?

And look, since we aren't dealing with massive superstars like > or > or someone else of that caliber, I actually think the humor is spot on.

🙂

What a character... honestly, I’ve been sitting here thinking about it, and I really feel like that rating over on IMDb is way too generous...

There’s just so much being thrown around all at once that everything has become a complete and utter mess...

Look, cosmiclynx57, I honestly can't tell if you're just being incredibly dense or if there's some underlying streak of pure malice driving you... it's hard to say at this point...
Angela Davis4 Angela Davis4 Member
14 messages
joined May 2012
#31 ·
I honestly regret even sitting through that trailer.
silvertiger11 silvertiger11 Active Member
106 messages
joined Jul 2016
#32 ·
Honestly, I regret even clicking on this thread.
Who actually watches this kind of stuff?
Frank Chase6 Frank Chase6 Member
20 messages
joined Nov 2012
#33 ·
Angela Davis4 said:I honestly regret even sitting through that trailer.

I feel like you could probably sue for damages just based on how much of your life was wasted watching this. 😛

It really feels like this whole genre went down the drain along with the Nielsen ratings.
Angela Davis4 Angela Davis4 Member
14 messages
joined May 2012
#34 ·
Frank Chase6 said:I feel like you could probably sue for damages just based on how much of your life was wasted watching this. 😛

It really feels like this whole genre went down the drain along with the Nielsen ratings.

Exactly. If there is anyone left even remotely capable of salvaging a parody, it would be David Zucker. But even he seems to be running on fumes lately. With Scary Movie 5 coming out soon, the trailer suggests it isn't any better than what we just saw; in fact, it looks identical to this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxDKvbx_JPg
boldfox88 boldfox88 Active Member
130 messages
joined Aug 2012
#35 ·
cosmiclynx57, I am all over the map 😢
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#36 ·
Shut it down after 15 minutes. Sorry, man, I just couldn't keep going
Frank Chase6 Frank Chase6 Member
20 messages
joined Nov 2012
#37 ·
Angela Davis4 said:Exactly. If there is anyone left even remotely capable of salvaging a parody, it would be David Zucker. But even he seems to be running on fumes lately. With Scary Movie 5 coming out soon, the trailer suggests it isn't any better than what we just saw; in fact, it looks identical to this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxDKvbx_JPg

This is awful. Wait—was it Nielsen in the fourth one? My only theory is that they just never really "got" his sense of humor, so now they have no clue how to replicate it.😁
Angela Davis4 Angela Davis4 Member
14 messages
joined May 2012
#38 ·
Frank Chase6 As I was thinking about this earlier, one couldn't help but wonder: what exactly defines the essence of a true storyteller? Is it merely the sequence of events we relay to one another, or is there something more profound, a certain weight to the words themselves that lingers long after the conversation has ended? It seems to me that when we sit down to reflect on our experiences, we aren't just recounting facts, but rather attempting to capture a fleeting moment in time. Does anyone else feel that sense of responsibility when sharing a story, the need to ensure that the truth—however subjective it may be—is preserved with sincerity?
This is honestly quite tragic. Was it really Nielsen in that quartet? The only theory that makes any sense to me is that they simply never grasped his specific brand of humor back then, so now they find themselves completely unable to replicate it. 😁

I really think the issue lies with Zucker himself. It feels like he’s started trying way too hard to cater to the audience, which just isn't working. If I’m being completely honest, I still find Scary Movie 4—the one with Leslie—to be the absolute peak of that entire franchise. All that repetitive nonsense about racial stereotypes just doesn't land for me, though I suppose that might just be because I'm not part of that specific subculture, don't listen to rap, and happen to be older than fifteen. Shouldn't a filmmaker return to parodying everyday life situations rather than just making cheap shots at blockbuster hits released since the last Scary Movie? It feels incredibly low-effort when they do that. But anyway, let's move on; we've wandered quite far from the original point.
Frank Chase6 Frank Chase6 Member
20 messages
joined Nov 2012
#39 ·
Honestly, after reading comments like these, I don’t think anyone’s even going to bother watching this movie—unless they’re a total masochist 😁

I’m not really a fan of that modern brand of Black humor either, to be fair. The stuff from the *Fresh Prince of Bel Air* era was actually pretty funny. You could even see traces of it back in *Don't Be Sad*... plus, that guy from *The Intern* uses a similar style, which makes it work for me. But this new "yo-mama" type of humor? Yeah, it's exactly at that bottom-of-the-barrel level you were talking about.
cosmiclynx57 cosmiclynx57 RegularOP
320 messages
joined Mar 2019
#40 ·
Frank Chase6 said:Honestly, after reading comments like these, I don’t think anyone’s even going to bother watching this movie—unless they’re a total masochist 😁

I’m not really a fan of that modern brand of Black humor either, to be fair. The stuff from the *Fresh Prince of Bel Air* era was actually pretty funny. You could even see traces of it back in *Don't Be Sad*... plus, that guy from *The Intern* uses a similar style, which makes it work for me. But this new "yo-mama" type of humor? Yeah, it's exactly at that bottom-of-the-barrel level you were talking about.

But look, it really all comes down to the individual, doesn't it? Some people don't give a single damn about what anyone else says online; if the topic grabs them or looks interesting, they're just gonna hit play regardless.

Take me, for example—I'd totally sit down and watch the new Total Recall even if every single person on this entire forum was trashing it and there wasn't one solitary positive thing to be found.

The big mistake a lot of folks make when talking about this flick is comparing it to those top-tier, A category parodies. You can't do that! You've gotta realize this is more of a B movie, so why even try to measure it against the heavy hitters?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads