CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Banning users who threaten police reports or similar legal action

Banning users who threaten police reports or similar legal action

Started by James Patel20 · · 👁 9 views · 91 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants James Patel20slybison8steelwalker68Brenda Cook4Amanda Hughes37hiddenlynx66Larry Walker24Christian Torres3Arthur Flores2wanderingheron52rustydrifter10steelskipper5bluecyclist64Susan Price30hollowtrucker77briskpuma23Henry Hernandez7loneraven25Jacob Allendustyfalcon3Nicholas KingSophia Thomas7Daniel Ward87Bryan Jones82
briskpuma23 briskpuma23 Active Member
83 messages
joined Mar 2012
#61 ·
steelskipper5 said:Look, threats of violence and hate speech are literal crimes. You shouldn't even be bothering moderators with them; you should go straight to the police. Regardless of whatever "forum etiquette" exists, the Law of the USA mandates that you report a crime when you know one's been committed. As far as I'm concerned, American laws trump forum rules and traditions every single time.

I have zero interest in laws that turn citizens into informants.

This is a forum. My job, as a user, is to shut down someone using hate speech to win an argument and, if I see fit, report them to the admins. Dragging the police into all of this is just pathetic.
steelskipper5 steelskipper5 Active Member
176 messages
joined Feb 2010
#62 ·
briskpuma23 said:I have zero interest in laws that turn citizens into informants.

This is a forum. My job, as a user, is to shut down someone using hate speech to win an argument and, if I see fit, report them to the admins. Dragging the police into all of this is just pathetic.

I really don't give a damn about rules that turn forum users into rats.

This is a forum. My job, as a user, is to beat someone talking nonsense in a debate. Getting moderators or the admin involved in everything is, well, kind of pathetic. ☕
briskpuma23 briskpuma23 Active Member
83 messages
joined Mar 2012
#63 ·
steelskipper5 said:I really don't give a damn about rules that turn forum users into rats.

This is a forum. My job, as a user, is to beat someone talking nonsense in a debate. Getting moderators or the admin involved in everything is, well, kind of pathetic. ☕

Well, try paraphrasing then.
slybison8 slybison8 Active Member
162 messages
joined Oct 2011
#64 ·
steelskipper5 said:Look, I said that’s an argument you could—if you really tried—actually back up. But just repeating it isn't providing an argument. ☕
Reporting crimes (or things people *think* are crimes) is basically a civic duty. The institutions, assuming they do their jobs, are the ones who decide if a report is legitimate or if there’s actually enough ground to move forward.

Unfortunately, the government even encourages this by allowing anonymous tips and acting on them, but that's a whole different conversation...

So, what—the laws and the people enforcing them are encouraging system abuse? 😵
Setting aside the fact that a lot of stuff couldn't be reported unless it was anonymous because people don't feel safe coming forward—but yeah, sure, you're probably right. 🙄

The legal consequences are a joke. The fallout from someone being harassed or subjected to an investigation based on malicious or fake reports is irreparable.

If we're talking about a malicious report over something posted online, the consequences for the person being investigated are also non-existent. Not "irreparable."
I once reported some extremely explicit threats, and the absolute worst those losers got was a little chat with the police. Because the Department of Justice decided there were no criminal elements since they claimed they were "just joking."

So much for those "irreparable" consequences.
Save the fairy tales for someone else.

Someone who publicly threatens to report others (or brags about doing it) is saying way more about themselves than anyone else.

Don't do that.

Fine. From now on, I'll just report every single crime I see on this forum directly to the police, without bothering to discuss it with anyone else or the moderators.
There's really no point in warning forum users that certain behavior might have elements of a crime.

I’d just love for an admin to confirm what you said here, just so I have it in writing that administration is on the same page. ☕

There you have it. And it looks like, perhaps, you haven't learned anything from that experience after all. 🙂
steelskipper5 steelskipper5 Active Member
176 messages
joined Feb 2010
#65 ·
slybison8 said:There you have it. And it looks like, perhaps, you haven't learned anything from that experience after all. 🙂

Oh, I learned plenty. For instance, I learned that all your stories about how this leaves people devastated are just total nonsense—basically, you have no clue what you're talking about. ☕

Just because one part of the system isn't doing its job doesn't mean crimes shouldn't be reported to the Department of Justice. Otherwise, we might as well say that because some subreddits have terrible moderators, nobody should bother reporting rule violations there either.
steelskipper5 steelskipper5 Active Member
176 messages
joined Feb 2010
#66 ·
briskpuma23 said:Well, try paraphrasing then.

Nah, how about trying some sarcasm?
loneraven25 loneraven25 Active Member
77 messages
joined Jul 2013
#67 ·
steelskipper5 Asks:
Honestly, I couldn't care less about these rules that some of these users on Reddit are using just to act like little snitches.

Look, let's be real here—it's not like anyone was actually forcing anyone to do anything. Terms of Use Honestly, I have to wonder—what exactly do you think you’re agreeing to when you click that registration button? Does anyone actually bother to read those endless walls of legalese, or are we all just blindly signing our lives away to the digital void? What kind of terms and conditions are we really consenting to here?
Are you seriously suggesting that you’re also expected to play by all these regulations? Rules....
You can actually step up and help out too by reporting any posts you think the moderators really need to jump on through the usual channels. Direct messages....or you can just use that automatic post submission feature—you know, the one where you just click on the thumbnail? Which one is on every single post?
Jacob Allen Jacob Allen Member
22 messages
joined May 2003
#68 ·
briskpuma23 said:I have zero interest in laws that turn citizens into informants.

This is a forum. My job, as a user, is to shut down someone using hate speech to win an argument and, if I see fit, report them to the admins. Dragging the police into all of this is just pathetic.

Everything is totally doable—the wins, the tactics, the sheer satisfaction of it all—as long as you haven't been permabanned yet. 😬
...but how exactly are you going to win an argument by reporting someone to the admins?
And honestly, I don't see any real difference between reporting a post to the police or reporting it to the mods/admins; the gap is tiny and basically irrelevant.
To me, it feels like there’s more "police" energy happening here... and everything that might follow, which feels more like a competition than an actual desire for free speech.

Seriously though, don't go running to the cops; we have our own institutions right here. It's just like when the cops start nitpicking and whining... don't go reporting them to your District Attorneys; report them to us instead!

The absolute worst thing you can do isn't just being a whiner and chasing some neurotic version of justice; it's being a whiner toward moderators who are out here fighting for free speech—well, at least within their own monopoly on interpreting what free speech means.

It sounds like one of those ultimate moderator catchphrases of the year, something like "we won't allow that kind of thing on this forum."
All that's missing is the dramatic opening line for the trial... "you know what you did, and if you don't know, well, everyone knows you know why you're guilty." 🧐

That's why people click those little warning triangles you see on road signs; because with every single click, you're basically offloading a piece of freedom, rights, opinions, and responsibility onto these poor moderators who are just over-performing their sense of duty... and everything else, really.

Reporting stuff to the police is exactly the same as reporting it to the mods; there's no massive distinction, and anyone is free to do one, the other, both, or absolutely nothing at all without having to justify themselves to anyone.
It's not a problem, even if it is pretty pointless. It's the same way you could pray for leniency from a mod or a cop when they're interpreting the law, life, or whatever. Nothing happens without a rulebook telling you how to do it... and we aren't going to let that happen here.

But the real issue is when you try to dump your own whining onto other people and lecture them on what to do or not do, based entirely on whatever level of pettiness you're operating from.
That's the beauty of this kind of manipulation, though; you can't really report anyone for it. How are you even going to report that?
...and you can't even call a forum regular a whiner to their face because that's... what's the word... offensive, and that kind of language won't be tolerated on this forum.

But you *can* do something else. You can point out those kinds of characters, and then let people decide for themselves who they're dealing with and whether they'll be clicking those anti-cop triangles tomorrow just to get a "win," seeking justice, or looking for some neurotic satisfaction, a mental milestone, or a virtual slice of liberty delivered by some moderator (or maybe even a shadowy group of officials sitting in the background) who happens to be a whiner themselves.

Is that really a victory? Whose victory is it, and for whom? Is that a win? Becoming your own snitch? Go right ahead...
dustyfalcon3 dustyfalcon3 Member
12 messages
joined May 2009
#69 ·
It looks like Daniel Ward87 has finally realized his lifelong dream. About a week or two ago, he unilaterally decided to invent a new verbal offense, so apparently, you aren't allowed to write "Catholic Taliban" anymore—even if you aren't talking about the users here—because suddenly you get slapped with a 500-point penalty. Of course, calling non-right-wing opinions or links "communist" or "Soviet" is still perfectly fine; our dear little guy doesn't seem to mind that at all. He hasn't made it onto the blacklist of Reddit’s unsung censors just yet, though who knows when that will happen.
Well... aside from a few exceptions like some prominent moderators (Brenda Cook4, El Niño, Daniel Ward87...) and a handful of regulars, I don't see anyone doing anything about this disgrace. And Daniel Ward87? He moved even faster to shut down the thread to prevent a repeat of what happened a few years back. Back then, he tried the same thing, but both the believers and the skeptics chased him right off the topic, forcing him to back down. Naturally, since negative selection seems to be the rule rather than the exception in America, it only emboldened him to take on this "stronger" administrative role to finally enforce what was "unfairly" blocked before.

Sadly, just a week or two ago, we didn't have people like James Patel20 or slybison8 around to rebel against this kind of virtual bullying. And now, predictably... censorship has come knocking on their doors. Now we have the offended crying, accusing others of "snitching," and actually calling for *more* censorship. They are absolutely, completely oblivious to the absurdity of such a demand.

My friend James Patel20, where were you and people like you when Strile was imposing censorship on those who disagreed with you? If you had stood up with everyone else back then, maybe more people could be supporting you now. But instead, nothing... censorship was imposed on everyone else too... and now everyone lives in fear of every single occurrence... damn it. Maybe you'll learn that sometimes you actually have to fight together, because you can't fix censorship... by adding more censorship. 🤦

By the way, James Patel20, even though I find many of your posts (and slybison8's, for that matter) to be completely moronic, and quite often incredibly insulting to any intelligent and rational human being, I do support your right to freedom of thought and speech. That includes your utterly idiotic conspiracy theories about "paid" LGBT rallies and other nonsense.
James Patel20 James Patel20 Active MemberOP
53 messages
joined Jan 2012
#70 ·
sukKi said:one really only needs to look at the body of work produced by the proponents of this idea
and even the most average person would see the truth quite quickly, unless, of course, Anderlon and the admins of this forum decide otherwise... 🙂

If you have a problem with my arguments, please feel free to speak up or quote me directly.

Don't try to hide behind the admins or the owner... 😉

dustyfalcon3 said:It looks like Daniel Ward87 has finally realized his lifelong dream. About a week or two ago, he unilaterally decided to invent a new verbal offense, so apparently, you aren't allowed to write "Catholic Taliban" anymore—even if you aren't talking about the users here—because suddenly you get slapped with a 500-point penalty. Of course, calling non-right-wing opinions or links "communist" or "Soviet" is still perfectly fine; our dear little guy doesn't seem to mind that at all. He hasn't made it onto the blacklist of Reddit’s unsung censors just yet, though who knows when that will happen.
Well... aside from a few exceptions like some prominent moderators (Brenda Cook4, El Niño, Daniel Ward87...) and a handful of regulars, I don't see anyone doing anything about this disgrace. And Daniel Ward87? He moved even faster to shut down the thread to prevent a repeat of what happened a few years back. Back then, he tried the same thing, but both the believers and the skeptics chased him right off the topic, forcing him to back down. Naturally, since negative selection seems to be the rule rather than the exception in America, it only emboldened him to take on this "stronger" administrative role to finally enforce what was "unfairly" blocked before.

Sadly, just a week or two ago, we didn't have people like James Patel20 or slybison8 around to rebel against this kind of virtual bullying. And now, predictably... censorship has come knocking on their doors. Now we have the offended crying, accusing others of "snitching," and actually calling for *more* censorship. They are absolutely, completely oblivious to the absurdity of such a demand.

My friend James Patel20, where were you and people like you when Strile was imposing censorship on those who disagreed with you? If you had stood up with everyone else back then, maybe more people could be supporting you now. But instead, nothing... censorship was imposed on everyone else too... and now everyone lives in fear of every single occurrence... damn it. Maybe you'll learn that sometimes you actually have to fight together, because you can't fix censorship... by adding more censorship. 🤦

By the way, James Patel20, even though I find many of your posts (and slybison8's, for that matter) to be completely moronic, and quite often incredibly insulting to any intelligent and rational human being, I do support your right to freedom of thought and speech. That includes your utterly idiotic conspiracy theories about "paid" LGBT rallies and other nonsense.

So, how exactly should we label your own posts then?

Since you're attributing someone else's quote about "paid" rallies to me...

And what kind of "idiotic and moronic" support would a kid like me even offer?

It would just ruin your "highly intelligent" crusade against the "Catholic Taliban" and their defenders...

Maybe you should go look for allies for this "holy war" of yours somewhere a bit more logical...

Like right here!
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#71 ·
Four pages spent debating a question that doesn't even exist in the first place🙂.

Whether or not someone decides to report posts to this or that instance—well, that’s entirely their business. It's a personal choice and an individual right, and frankly, it has absolutely nothing to do with the actual mechanics of how a forum functions. I mean, people have the right (let's set aside the potential consequences of such reports for a moment) to call the police if a neighbor is cooking cabbage again and the smell is drifting into their house, or if a neighbor stumbles in at 3 AM and wakes everyone up with footsteps in the hallway; so, why shouldn't they have the right to report a forum post they believe violates some specific Law of the USA? 😕 The suggestion that "instead of calling the police, you should be reporting to moderators" is just a massive fail, in more ways than one.

By the same token, it is everyone's prerogative to view those who report posts as either conscientious crusaders or, conversely, as petty nuisances. Again, that perception has zero connection to the fundamental nature of forum culture.

What *does* actually pertain to forum etiquette is the simple fact that saying "I reported you to the police," "I'm going to report you to the police," and things along those lines, is trolling—and as such, it ought to be met with the appropriate penalty. There isn't a single discussion where a sentence like that would be considered on-topic, constructive, or even remotely sensible.

And that is really all there is to 🙂it.
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 Regular
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#72 ·
steelskipper5 said:Look, I said that’s an argument you could—if you really tried—actually back up. But just repeating it isn't providing an argument. ☕
Reporting crimes (or things people *think* are crimes) is basically a civic duty. The institutions, assuming they do their jobs, are the ones who decide if a report is legitimate or if there’s actually enough ground to move forward.

Unfortunately, the government even encourages this by allowing anonymous tips and acting on them, but that's a whole different conversation...

So, what—the laws and the people enforcing them are encouraging system abuse? 😵
Setting aside the fact that a lot of stuff couldn't be reported unless it was anonymous because people don't feel safe coming forward—but yeah, sure, you're probably right. 🙄

The legal consequences are a joke. The fallout from someone being harassed or subjected to an investigation based on malicious or fake reports is irreparable.

If we're talking about a malicious report over something posted online, the consequences for the person being investigated are also non-existent. Not "irreparable."
I once reported some extremely explicit threats, and the absolute worst those losers got was a little chat with the police. Because the Department of Justice decided there were no criminal elements since they claimed they were "just joking."

So much for those "irreparable" consequences.
Save the fairy tales for someone else.

Someone who publicly threatens to report others (or brags about doing it) is saying way more about themselves than anyone else.

Don't do that.

Fine. From now on, I'll just report every single crime I see on this forum directly to the police, without bothering to discuss it with anyone else or the moderators.
There's really no point in warning forum users that certain behavior might have elements of a crime.

I’d just love for an admin to confirm what you said here, just so I have it in writing that administration is on the same page. ☕


But the question remains: why would you—or anyone else—warn a user about something like that unless you were trolling or, at the very least, going off-topic? By doing so, you're essentially breaking the rules of discussion by default.

Unless someone isn't just some troll, right? In that case, it’s actually a godsend... basically just a heads-up or a warning, which you see used all the time on certain subreddits anyway.Well, I guess I'll be reporting you to the moderator for that entry.If things had been even a little bit more pathetic—I am going to report you to the police for that post.

So, what happens next? Theoretically, someone could be charged with "wasting police resources," though I honestly wonder if the police would even take a baseless report seriously—especially when it's coming from the same person over and over again. In that case, I don't think they'd pay much attention at all.

Of course, we’re still seeing those "non-right-wing" opinions and links being circulated. He can go right ahead and call them communists or whatever else he wants. It clearly doesn't bother our little guy one bit. He hasn't made it onto the unheralded censor's blacklist on Reddit yet, but who knows when that might happen?

Do you have any examples where that actually works without getting completely rejected? Let me think... yeah, absolutely nowhere. 😁
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 Regular
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#73 ·
Nicholas King said:Four pages spent debating a question that doesn't even exist in the first place🙂.

Whether or not someone decides to report posts to this or that instance—well, that’s entirely their business. It's a personal choice and an individual right, and frankly, it has absolutely nothing to do with the actual mechanics of how a forum functions. I mean, people have the right (let's set aside the potential consequences of such reports for a moment) to call the police if a neighbor is cooking cabbage again and the smell is drifting into their house, or if a neighbor stumbles in at 3 AM and wakes everyone up with footsteps in the hallway; so, why shouldn't they have the right to report a forum post they believe violates some specific Law of the USA? 😕 The suggestion that "instead of calling the police, you should be reporting to moderators" is just a massive fail, in more ways than one.

By the same token, it is everyone's prerogative to view those who report posts as either conscientious crusaders or, conversely, as petty nuisances. Again, that perception has zero connection to the fundamental nature of forum culture.

What *does* actually pertain to forum etiquette is the simple fact that saying "I reported you to the police," "I'm going to report you to the police," and things along those lines, is trolling—and as such, it ought to be met with the appropriate penalty. There isn't a single discussion where a sentence like that would be considered on-topic, constructive, or even remotely sensible.

And that is really all there is to 🙂it.

you're right, of course🙂 but until a rule or classification is actually introduced stating that such behavior constitutes unnecessary trolling (which it seems to be), then I guess we need four or however many pages of differing opinions and "thinking out loud"...
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#74 ·
steelskipper5 said:Look, I said that’s an argument you could—if you really tried—actually back up. But just repeating it isn't providing an argument. ☕
Reporting crimes (or things people *think* are crimes) is basically a civic duty. The institutions, assuming they do their jobs, are the ones who decide if a report is legitimate or if there’s actually enough ground to move forward.

Unfortunately, the government even encourages this by allowing anonymous tips and acting on them, but that's a whole different conversation...

So, what—the laws and the people enforcing them are encouraging system abuse? 😵
Setting aside the fact that a lot of stuff couldn't be reported unless it was anonymous because people don't feel safe coming forward—but yeah, sure, you're probably right. 🙄

The legal consequences are a joke. The fallout from someone being harassed or subjected to an investigation based on malicious or fake reports is irreparable.

If we're talking about a malicious report over something posted online, the consequences for the person being investigated are also non-existent. Not "irreparable."
I once reported some extremely explicit threats, and the absolute worst those losers got was a little chat with the police. Because the Department of Justice decided there were no criminal elements since they claimed they were "just joking."

So much for those "irreparable" consequences.
Save the fairy tales for someone else.

Someone who publicly threatens to report others (or brags about doing it) is saying way more about themselves than anyone else.

Don't do that.

Fine. From now on, I'll just report every single crime I see on this forum directly to the police, without bothering to discuss it with anyone else or the moderators.
There's really no point in warning forum users that certain behavior might have elements of a crime.

I’d just love for an admin to confirm what you said here, just so I have it in writing that administration is on the same page. ☕

I mean, why should the administration even need to agree or disagree with someone's personal decision to report something to the cops? 😕
Susan Price30 said:you're right, of course🙂 but until a rule or classification is actually introduced stating that such behavior constitutes unnecessary trolling (which it seems to be), then I guess we need four or however many pages of differing opinions and "thinking out loud"...

Anytime someone injects elements into a discussion that have absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand, that's trolling.

I really don't see any distinction between the relevance of saying "I reported you to the police" and saying, "Oh, we were out at a BBQ yesterday and I was recounting your posts—man, we were cracking up—and then Pero opened a bottle of Knopfltrunkov's Traminer, which is quite a remarkable wine, by the way..."
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 Regular
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#75 ·
Nicholas King said:I mean, why should the administration even need to agree or disagree with someone's personal decision to report something to the cops? 😕

Anytime someone injects elements into a discussion that have absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand, that's trolling.

I really don't see any distinction between the relevance of saying "I reported you to the police" and saying, "Oh, we were out at a BBQ yesterday and I was recounting your posts—man, we were cracking up—and then Pero opened a bottle of Knopfltrunkov's Traminer, which is quite a remarkable wine, by the way..."

One more thing—if those entries here were made by anonymous users... Ownership. If someone files a report regarding certain posts on Reddit—which is a completely different beast compared to, say, long-form articles on other social media platforms—what would be the actual legal liability and consequences in that scenario? Reddit is such a joke, honestly. It’s nothing compared to the old forums.Is it just me, or does all this talk about whether filing a police report is even a viable option seem completely baseless?
Bringing up things that have absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand is just trolling.

I don't see any difference in relevance between saying "I reported you to the police" and "Man, we were at that BBQ yesterday and I was re-reading your posts—we were cracking up, then Pero opened a bottle of Knopfltrunkov's Traminer, which is honestly an incredible wine."

That’s true, but this might actually be even worse. If someone is resorting to threats just to silence a conversation, what does that say about their character? It’s pretty telling when people try to weaponize intimidation like that. In my opinion, it’s clearly just a troll with nothing to back them up.
Nicholas King Nicholas King Regular
716 messages
joined Jan 2023
#76 ·
Susan Price30 Asks:
Potential legal liability—it’s one of those things that people just seem to gloss over until it’s too late, I guess. There's this constant, nagging question hanging over everything: where does the responsibility actually lie? Maybe it's a gray area, or maybe we just don't talk about the consequences enough. It's a messy subject, honestly—full of nuances and "what-ifs" that can turn a simple situation into a total nightmare if you aren't careful. One wrong move, one oversight in following the Law of the USA, and suddenly you're staring down a massive headache that could have been avoided with a little more foresight. It’s a heavy topic, but it bears repeating—you really have to consider the fallout before you dive headfirst into something. Honestly, I’ve got to say—Reddit is absolutely killing it lately. It makes those old-school message boards look like ancient history..

I don't think you're quite right on this one—if I may be so bold.
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#77 ·
Nicholas King said:
Susan Price30 Asks:
Potential legal liability—it’s one of those things that people just seem to gloss over until it’s too late, I guess. There's this constant, nagging question hanging over everything: where does the responsibility actually lie? Maybe it's a gray area, or maybe we just don't talk about the consequences enough. It's a messy subject, honestly—full of nuances and "what-ifs" that can turn a simple situation into a total nightmare if you aren't careful. One wrong move, one oversight in following the Law of the USA, and suddenly you're staring down a massive headache that could have been avoided with a little more foresight. It’s a heavy topic, but it bears repeating—you really have to consider the fallout before you dive headfirst into something. Honestly, I’ve got to say—Reddit is absolutely killing it lately. It makes those old-school message boards look like ancient history..

I don't think you're quite right on this one—if I may be so bold.

Pretty much spot on. As far as I know, our current laws haven't really caught up to make platform owners liable yet; for now, the buck still stops with the end user.
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 Regular
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#78 ·
Nicholas King said:
Susan Price30 Asks:
Potential legal liability—it’s one of those things that people just seem to gloss over until it’s too late, I guess. There's this constant, nagging question hanging over everything: where does the responsibility actually lie? Maybe it's a gray area, or maybe we just don't talk about the consequences enough. It's a messy subject, honestly—full of nuances and "what-ifs" that can turn a simple situation into a total nightmare if you aren't careful. One wrong move, one oversight in following the Law of the USA, and suddenly you're staring down a massive headache that could have been avoided with a little more foresight. It’s a heavy topic, but it bears repeating—you really have to consider the fallout before you dive headfirst into something. Honestly, I’ve got to say—Reddit is absolutely killing it lately. It makes those old-school message boards look like ancient history..

I don't think you're quite right on this one—if I may be so bold.

Up until now, it was always understood that any text posted on Reddit was the sole property and responsibility of Reddit itself. Even quite recently, a moderator stated exactly that on the KzB board.

If that's no longer the case, perhaps it should be officially announced somewhere, because the current situation is a bit confusing...
Daniel Ward87 Daniel Ward87 Active Member
195 messages
joined May 2023
#79 ·
Everyone is personally responsible for what they post here on Reddit. From an admin standpoint, the site owns the content, meaning we have the right to delete, edit, or manage posts as we see fit.

We don't tolerate threats on this platform, but honestly, you probably won't see anyone banned just for saying they’re going to report someone to the police. If a user feels something posted here warrants a call to the authorities, that's their prerogative. Playing the "I'm calling the cops on you" card during an argument feels a bit childish to me.


Susan Price30 said:Up until now, it was always understood that any text posted on Reddit was the sole property and responsibility of Reddit itself. Even quite recently, a moderator stated exactly that on the KzB board.

If that's no longer the case, perhaps it should be officially announced somewhere, because the current situation is a bit confusing...

Responsible for what, exactly?
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 Regular
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#80 ·
Responsibility for what, exactly?

Alright, I finally get it—user posts are essentially owned by the website they’re hosted on. The forum itself carries the legal weight for whatever content goes up, rather than the anonymous writer. I actually thought things worked differently before the recent legal shifts here in the States regarding those issues.

It's the same deal with threads from this site being picked up by major American news outlets or other sites (like when a user wrote about that CNN reality show). Those pieces aren't credited to the actual author; they just list the username and the host site. So, I figured the platform was taking credit (or, if you want to be technical, "responsibility") for the content instead of the individual who actually wrote it.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads