#41 ·
Larry Allen34 said:This isn't "my truth"—these are official FACTS—and that is precisely where the issue lies, when people resort to trolling something that shouldn't even be up for debate, all while Woobie tries to frame my position as merely a personal opinion. I corrected my own slip-up regarding whether the modified vaccine was rolled out in 2016 or 2018, yet that minor correction is being weaponized to dismiss undeniable realities. And the reality is this...
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and their team introduced a new modified vaccine back in 2016.
Since 2017, his team has been aware of potential complications stemming from field mutations, where the virus utilizes all three variants to find an opening—an opening it found in the type 2 strain, which they excluded from the modified vaccine, yet they continued pushing forward for the next three years regardless.
The WHO is publishing false claims about having conquered polio in Africa—it appears the supposed victory happened in the latter half of 2019, not 2020 (a strain that had already vanished in 2016 due to the application of the Sabin-2 vaccine). Just seven days after those reports, there was a massive damage-control fallout once the information leaked through independent media outlets and eventually reached mainstream giants like the Guardian and others.
Only then did the WHO admit to the mess, even suggesting they might reconsider the Sabin-2 vaccine just to fix the disaster they created—a disaster that, in plain English, translates to hundreds upon hundreds of children dying every single year in the depths of Africa.
And for this entire catastrophe? Not a single soul has been held accountable.
These are facts, not mere perspectives; every single one of these points is backed by the numerous links I’ve provided from both independent and mainstream sources. Ultimately, you can even find the evidence of this "damage control" on the official WHO website itself, though naturally, it's phrased as a formal statement saying, "this happened, and now we are cooperating with the health ministries of the affected countries to rectify the situation."
https://www.who.int/csr/don/29-novem...can-region/en/
So, when someone denies the connection between the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and this modified vaccine—which is indisputably their product—or denies that we waited three years, or claims the entire scientific community is responsible for the oversight, that isn't a debate. It is pure, unadulterated trolling, and it really ought to be sanctioned!
Alright, I hear you, and I do remember—though the details are a bit hazy—that there was indeed some kind of scandal involving that polio vaccine.
However, I still struggle with the idea that we should punish someone for trolling if all they are doing is offering a different interpretation of the events.
By that logic, anyone who writes that they don't want to be vaccinated, or doesn't want their children vaccinated, because they have a fear—whether rational or perceived—of vaccines altering DNA, should be punished as a troll. To me, that simply isn't fair.
People have every right to express their opinions, their fears, and even their misconceptions.