briskhound2 said:Think *Mission: Impossible* or *Charlie's Angels*—you know, those big blockbuster hits. In *Charlie's Angels*, having John Forsyth provide the voice for that invisible boss was such a clever little touch.
It’s kind of wild looking back. From the mid-90s through the early 2000s, there was this massive trend of turning old 60s spy shows into big Hollywood movies. First we got *Mission: Impossible*, then *The Saint*, *The Avengers*, *Wild Wild West*, and *I Spy*... followed later by *Get Smart*, and then way after that, *The Man from U.N.C.L.E.* It was everywhere.
So many of them just got buried by the critics. 😁
Richard Wilson4 said:*Serenity* feels more like a glorified bonus episode to me. But *Ash vs Evil Dead*? That’s a rare exception. It’s actually an incredible series born from a movie. Usually, those kinds of spin-offs just don't amount to much.
So, if I remember right, shows like Bates Motel, Hannibal, Westworld, plus mentioning Ash and 12 Monkeys—those are all great examples of highly acclaimed series that actually started out as movies.
Honestly, I’d even say there have been plenty of them during this whole "TV renaissance" we've seen over the last decade or so.
copperdrifter2 said:The Chronicles of Narnia... honestly, that series was such a massive part of my childhood. It was just so good. Even though they eventually moved away from focusing solely on the Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe stuff, it still hit home. As for the movies? Yeah, they didn't really do much for me. Not my thing.
Movies are just new adaptations of novels anyway, so I wouldn't really put them in this category.
Honestly, I’d make a clear distinction between movie sequels based on TV shows—you know, like Batman with Adam West, Star Trek, Sex and the City, Twin Peaks, Serenity, or The X-Files—versus actual remakes or reboots. Think about those spy flicks I was talking about, or stuff like Miami Vice, Lost in Space, The Fugitive, or The Untouchables. Totally different vibes.