#1 ·
Here’s the situation.
Whenever I try to engage in actual scientific debate—specifically when I’m calling out blatant falsehoods—the moderators step in and wipe my posts clean.
Because of that, I’m copying and pasting a previous post here from another thread, since I already knew they were going to delete it anyway.
Oh sure, sounds like something straight out of Satan.com.🤣
What delusional nonsense. So, I take it that "ten-year-old kid" you mentioned was actually you?
I feel for you; it must be exhausting living in that twisted version of "reality" you've constructed.
If you want to stop playing pretend, go check the court records yourself and find those 16 patents you're claiming exist.
That is, provided you can actually read English.
Since you seem to be struggling, let me do the heavy lifting for you: "CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
1. The broad claims of the Marconi patent no. 763,772, for improvements in apparatus for wireless telegraphy -- briefly, for a structure and arrangement of four high-frequency circuits with means of independently adjusting each so that all four may be brought into electrical resonance with one another -- held invalid because anticipated. P. 320 U. S. 38...
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed...20/1/case.html "
I just ask that I be allowed to respond to the post.
Thanks.
Whenever I try to engage in actual scientific debate—specifically when I’m calling out blatant falsehoods—the moderators step in and wipe my posts clean.
Because of that, I’m copying and pasting a previous post here from another thread, since I already knew they were going to delete it anyway.
saugaro said:You don't have a clue what you're talking about... send me the link.
Tesla certainly wasn't the first to achieve anything in this field; at its core, a resonant circuit is the only requirement.
Tesla didn't actually know what he was doing—he just pushed things to extremes by following established methods.
And what happened next? Absolutely nothing...
But even that wasn't truly his work.
The real author behind that patent was just some ten-year-old kid.
Another invalid conclusion, Peter Peterson... where are those 16 patents that Marconi used to humiliate Tesla?
Look, you clearly don't understand the context, but that was all propaganda... Westinghouse basically took Tesla on as an eccentric just to land the contract.
Oh sure, sounds like something straight out of Satan.com.🤣
What delusional nonsense. So, I take it that "ten-year-old kid" you mentioned was actually you?
I feel for you; it must be exhausting living in that twisted version of "reality" you've constructed.
If you want to stop playing pretend, go check the court records yourself and find those 16 patents you're claiming exist.
That is, provided you can actually read English.
Since you seem to be struggling, let me do the heavy lifting for you: "CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
1. The broad claims of the Marconi patent no. 763,772, for improvements in apparatus for wireless telegraphy -- briefly, for a structure and arrangement of four high-frequency circuits with means of independently adjusting each so that all four may be brought into electrical resonance with one another -- held invalid because anticipated. P. 320 U. S. 38...
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed...20/1/case.html "
I just ask that I be allowed to respond to the post.
Thanks.