Nazi revisionism on the forums

So, despite the fact that quite a few users have already voiced complaints regarding the (in)activity of the moderator nasmijanonebo, the site administration still refuses to remove her from the History subforum.

Let me reiterate: I understand it isn't easy to recruit competent moderators for every single niche board, but it would be far more honest to leave History without any moderation at all than to allow a biased moderator to run it with such a heavy hand.

Dishonesty shouldn't be a prerequisite for holding a moderator position—would we all agree on that?

Just look at what nebo says to the FBI user Saur:

There was some back-and-forth, but reasons weren't shared. You didn't get a warning because you insulted Aurelius; I merely mentioned that you were being insulting, specifically regarding his grandfather being a soldier and his other grandfather being a partisan. You received warnings due to sentences like the ones I quoted in my previous post, because this isn't the only instance where you openly complain that people aren't being treated even worse than they were in the past, suggesting there should have been more killings, and that there's still more to come.
Everything would be fine if you weren't inciting death against forum members. You opened this thread because of your own ban, not because of the topic itself, so you can only complain about the ban.You received the ban through accumulated warnings; only three of those were mine (you received others from different mods).
(By mistake, I selected "caps lock" as the reason for one warning (I just checked and it should have been a different reason, though it carries the same point value).

In short, it is a flat-out lie regarding the accumulation of warnings. nebo effectively cost Saur 300 points by citing hate speech. This is easy enough for anyone to verify, and once it is, I expect an apology to be issued to the user for the moderator's conduct.

Is this really the kind of moderation you need?

Furthermore, the moderator completely ignores reported posts where users are insulted for having left-leaning political views; here is an example:

Aurelius said:The correct archival code is US National Archives 1491. CIA

Read above...

Thankfully we have you, pushing the boundaries of idiocy into yet undiscovered territories of human internet stupidity. A fool, a fool, and nothing else... 🤦

Reported—ignored. Here is another instance from the same user:

Aurelius said:Wow, so you've concluded this report was written in the year 2355 just because it has that archival code, and you think you're so smart?🙂

Integrity seems to be a foreign concept to you, doesn't it? We'll step on your face if we have to, just don't you dare touch our Titus.🙂

Take a look at the sheer volume of mindless, empty posts cluttering this space—nothing but emojis or a few sarcastic words thrown together just to troll. And yet, the moderator, Sky, simply deleted them without any disciplinary action whatsoever.

Look at this:

hr1u00 said:This is a report from Josip Broz Tito regarding the "liquidation of enemies of the people between 1945 and 1951."
Basically, these figures come straight from the top of a criminal regime. @bluecyclist64, haha.

They also claim that 3.8 million people "passed through camps" during that same period.

All of this would be quite compelling if such a report actually existed—BUT IT DOESN'T. Instead, we have historical revisionists trying to smear the anti-fascist movement, and Sky seems all too happy to facilitate them.

I could write volumes on this, but I honestly don't see the point. I would strongly suggest that someone competent from the Politics section takes a deep dive into this topic. Furthermore, I recommend removing Sky from the History moderation team; her conduct is neither ethical nor grounded in scientific fact—not to mention the legal implications that might be overlooked for now.

Pay close attention to how often these phantom statistics are cited—claims of over half a million casualties after World War II, or supposed killings of innocent women and children that lack any evidence beyond hearsay. It’s all a desperate attempt to whitewash the crimes of the fascist regime.

It is truly disgraceful to see this forum sinking to the level of Stormfront.

By the way, I’ve archived and saved this post, so there is no sense in deleting it.

Could someone please, for my uneducated self, explain what Nazi revisionism actually is? Please!

Look, I’ll set aside all that ideological nonsense for a second—but I actually agree with this point here.

Hey, Moderator @nasmijanonebo—if I'm being honest, I've noticed that posts often just vanish without any explanation if they don't fit the narrative.
I'll come back to check out the replies to something I wrote earlier, only to find... nothing. Just empty space where my comments used to be.
It’s not like I was dropping curse words or getting personal, either; I tried my absolute best to stay strictly on topic.

For instance, a question I posted regarding those CIA executions back in the spring and summer of 1945 was wiped clean—and that is the entire point of the discussion!
Meanwhile, you have users like @driftingorca16/">@@driftingorca16 who are allowed to ramble on about whatever random nonsense they want—stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with the CIA or that specific window in 1945. It's miles off track.

We are fully aware of the situation, and the senior moderation team is currently evaluating whether this constitutes a genuine issue and, if so, what the most appropriate course of action should be. For the time being, I am stepping in to ensure this doesn't spiral into unnecessary drama here.