Horror movie recommendations?

Here is a direct link proving how BAT Kol and Ryan Gomez4 run this place with nothing but double standards—they’re basically nuking any chance of a civilized discussion just to play favorites with the users they actually like.
To make matters worse, they’re comparing me to a complete moron; apparently, insults like that are perfectly acceptable as long as they're the "pets" of BAT Kol and Ryan Gomez4.

It seems like the moderation has just started getting a bit more aggressive when it comes to protecting the mods' little favorites—but honestly, just look at the absolute garbage still going on regarding those PDF files. I’m out here getting hit with red warnings while the actual major offenses are only getting yellow ones now.

Some forum users get a little too carried away during an argument and end up posting things they shouldn't. For some, a simple warning does the trick, but others definitely need a little cooling-off period.

With you, though, having a decent debate is just impossible—your constant complaining here proves it. Everyone else is wrong and you're the only one who's ever right.

Kimberly White63 said:There are definitely users here who get way too carried away during a debate.

Oh, there are—believe me, they are everywhere.

Sometimes they post things that are totally out of line; some just need a quick warning to straighten up, while others actually need a "cooling off" period.

And then you’ve got those certain people who clearly know they're the moderators' little favorites—they think they can say whatever they want and slide right past any consequences.

It’s impossible to have a rational discussion with you, though your constant complaining on this board makes that pretty obvious. In your mind, everyone else is wrong and you're the only one who's ever right.

What do you mean, "impossible"?
I'm not speaking in some foreign code—my positions are firm because I actually know when others are wrong. I don't feel the need to flip-flop just to please someone's sensibilities.

Peter Peterson said:They do, they really do.

And some people clearly know they're the mods' favorites, so they figure they can get away with anything.

What do you mean impossible?
I'm not speaking gibberish here. My stance isn't changing just because someone else is wrong, and I'm certainly not pivoting just to please the crowd.

That's exactly my point.

Kimberly White63 said:Some forum users get too carried away in an argument and end up posting things they shouldn't. For some, a simple warning does the trick. Others need a little cooling-off period.

/cut

Is this based on gut feeling, or is there an objective, emotionless standard being used? 😁

Since I find myself being called out, let me clarify my perspective on what constitutes a "civilized discussion." It requires comprehensiveness—actually reading and comprehending the substance of a post. That level of engagement is clearly lacking from a user of Peter Peterson's caliber, who rightfully feels slighted here. I agree that he has been wronged, though it is perfectly natural for things to escalate without intervention when someone simply fails to grasp the very concept of a debate. His standing here remains incomplete.
To be precise, Peter Peterson either lacks or refuses to demonstrate the ability to address even the most basic inquiries regarding claims that I personally guarantee are correct based on my own expertise. This is pure exclusivity.

Alternative doesn't imply psychotic behavior; rather, it refers to real-world possibilities where one should operate with their intellect, not just their physical presence.
And here is a prime example of what I would call a systemic malfunction:

Peter Peterson said:So, when you inflate a tire from 1 to 2 bar, you haven't added twice as much air; you've simply doubled the pressure inside the tire.

How do you explain that display? Look closely: he is generating a triple dose of nonsense entirely unprompted and delivering it to others as if it were fact.
He fails to understand how we know you aren't pumping in double the volume, just single volume (which is basic physics, 😁), and apparently, numbers greater than one are a foreign concept to him. Furthermore, his comments regarding the moderator guidelines aren't some grand stand for his beliefs; they are simply critiques of moderation as defined by the rules. One simply needs to know how to read.

Consequently, Peter Peterson's assertions are entirely baseless... whether on Alternative or right here.
P.S. I would write more, but 🕺

Go ahead and run off with your little clique because you clearly don't grasp the fundamentals of forces, pressure, or vacuum—you’re just conflating apples and oranges, yet you're still frustrated that I laid out hard facts that you can't actually refute.
You've essentially proven your own incompetence, which is why you've resorted to these pathetic ad hominem attacks.
It is honestly beneath me to even engage in a discussion with someone like you; go ahead and let your mommy give Ryan Gomez4 a pacifier since she clearly tolerates your wild, undisciplined behavior on this forum.
It's no wonder you think you're an expert on everything—you're a jack-of-all-trades and a master of none.

Jerry Robinson56 said:...
He’s apparently baffled by how we can distinguish between pumping up a double versus just a single dose (as if 😁 were some kind of mystery)—honestly, he seems completely stumped by any number higher than one...

What you just wrote is something my grandmother could have told me.
Besides, that wasn't even the point of the conversation.
Sure, what you said is technically accurate, but it's frankly pathetic that it took you weeks to reach that conclusion—you've clearly been circling the drain for weeks trying to force a debate that you already lost.
But look, people use that kind of jargon all the time; it's like saying someone is twice as difficult to move as a guy weighing 60 kg when they actually weigh 120 kg.
The way you're trying to play the genius here is nothing short of comical. Honestly, kid, we know you're "smart"—really, bravo, bravo... 🤣

That example was merely a demonstration of how banal you truly are, rather than an invitation for debate. You have already laid everything out in writing... entirely unprovoked.
As the saying goes: you trip over your own feet, knock yourself out, and then somehow manage to do it twice more. Naturally, you immediately look to blame others—in this instance, the moderators.
Furthermore, I provided you with a definition of your words, you simpleton. You lack even the basic qualifications required to be considered an idiot, so you clearly misunderstood that as well 🙂 ... A grave error indeed ... 👋
And as for the slang... if you insist on using such crude vernacular, you might as well try buttoning your shirt behind your back; just don't come complaining when someone points out that you aren't quite right in the head.
Not to mention the countless years wasted 🤣 Your so-called "Alternative" is quite peculiar.

Jerry Robinson56 said:The example was meant to illustrate just how banal you are—it wasn't an invitation for debate. You’ve already laid it all out in writing... without any provocation whatsoever.
As the saying goes: you trip over your own feet, knock yourself out, and then somehow manage to do it twice more—only to turn around and blame everyone else, in this case, the moderators.

Oh, absolutely—if they actually did their jobs, these "geniuses" and provocateurs wouldn't be able to work hand-in-hand with them to ban anyone who dares to think differently.

I also gave you my interpretation of those words, you moron. You don't even have the credentials to be called an idiot, so you got that wrong too 🙂 ... A massive blunder... 👋

Of course I don't, because I'm a sane person—but your insinuations are crystal clear. You are nothing more than a standard-issue provocateur being coddled by the moderation team, which is exactly what I’ve demonstrated here.

And as for the slang... well, you might as well try buttoning your shirt in the back if you're going to use such obnoxious language; just don't cry when someone points out you're acting unhinged.
Not to mention, 🤣 your "Alternative" idea is pretty bizarre.

Exaggeration proves nothing; nobody buttons their shirt from behind, and your nitpicking is nothing but a desperate, pathetic attempt to wiggle out of the absolute depths of your own defeat.

In a single word: HORROR. Honestly, I’m convinced half the moderators here actually know one another personally, which makes it even harder to wrap my head around how they can sleep at night while dragging their own reputations through the mud. They moderate based on these ridiculous, arbitrary standards—scanning every single sentence just to see if they can catch me breaking some obscure rule—all while playing favorites and shielding their little inner circle from any scrutiny. It's transparent. I know exactly when I'm going to get hit with a warning or a ban, and frankly, sometimes it feels worth it just to call out this nonsense. ☕

Well, I suppose everything that needed to be said has already been laid out, so I’m locking this thread. If a supermoderator or an admin feels there is more to contribute, they are welcome to reopen it.