CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › LJES used to be chill, now it's just sterile

LJES used to be chill, now it's just sterile

Started by Nicholas Williams7 · · 👁 4 views · 7 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Nicholas Williams7Dennis Jackson38graniteridge6brighteagle26mistyseal8Joshua Jones13
Nicholas Williams7 Nicholas Williams7 MemberOP
48 messages
joined Jan 2013
#1 ·
Like the title says, I’ve noticed a ton of posts involving a bit of banter—stuff that used to be totally fine and even encouraged as long as you didn't overdo it—are just getting wiped out.

Look, this whole forum is supposed to be a laid-back community. To me, this shift toward some sterile, clinical way of posting where everything has to stay strictly on-topic without a single joke or a little off-topic detour... it just kills the vibe and drags down the quality of the discussions.

So, what's the deal with this sudden pivot in how things are being moderated?
Dennis Jackson38 Dennis Jackson38 Member
34 messages
joined Feb 2011
#2 ·
Are you referring to those recent threads where a small clique completely derails the discussion, pivoting toward some sort of private inside joke that only they find amusing?

Since you’ve made it a habit to constantly call out the moderation team within philosophical discussions, why not be specific and provide a concrete example? 😁
graniteridge6 graniteridge6 Active Member
53 messages
joined Apr 2013
#3 ·
Nicholas Williams7, wait—is this all because of smartphones and those constant vibrations? 😁
I just noticed they’ve gone ahead and wiped them out. 🤣
If they get some sort of satisfaction from this retroactive sterilization of threads—well, let them have it, I suppose—honestly, I didn't even realize they were deleting things until now. 😁
brighteagle26 brighteagle26 Member
14 messages
joined Oct 2011
#4 ·
It’s honestly pathetic what they’ve done with it lately; there used to be an art to a good, playful tease, but now they’ve turned sex into this rigid science and a total dogma.
Nicholas Williams7 Nicholas Williams7 MemberOP
48 messages
joined Jan 2013
#5 ·
Sarah Sanders34 said:Are you talking about those recent threads where a small clique just drifts away from the actual topic and starts their own private inside joke session that nobody else finds funny?

Yeah.😁

Since you’re so quick to call out the mods in every single philosophy thread, why don't you actually be specific and give an example for once. 😁

Sometimes you're actually pleasant, other times you're just a total cold-hearted bitch. 😁

Where exactly have I been calling out the moderators? Please. I haven't called them out, nor have I reported anyone's post to the admins. You see my activity, so you should know better than that. This whole thread isn't even about attacking the staff; I'm genuinely trying to figure out what changed with the rules on the forums. I spend enough time there to understand how things usually work—what flies and what doesn't. A little off-topic chatter was never an issue before, but if they've tightened the leash, fine. Just put out a notice saying the tolerance for deviating from the original post is now zero.

And it's not just that they're nuking a few posts where people are drifting off-topic regarding, say, some massive breakthrough in tech that could change the world. They're also scrubbing posts that use slightly rougher language—stuff that used to be perfectly acceptable here.

Fine, you want an example? Besides the random chat, look at my deleted comment on that thread where some user was asking about smartphones and giveaways. I wrote that I'd rather shove one up her ass. 😁
I know that kind of thing wouldn't have been touched before, much like any light banter that your highness decides isn't "funny" enough.

graniteridge6 said:Joshua Jones13, is this all because of that smartphone and vibration thing? 😁
I just noticed they were deleted. 🤣
If they enjoy going back and sterilizing threads after the fact, let them. I didn't even realize they were deleting anything. 😁

Exactly.
But there's been deletions of other stuff lately too. 🤣 😁

Let them sterilize everything if they want, but damn, if we can't even mess around a little on a forum, what's the point?
Dennis Jackson38 Dennis Jackson38 Member
34 messages
joined Feb 2011
#6 ·
Everything from discussing smartphones to... well, let's just say some truly graphic and irrelevant sexual antics involving vibrating phones—none of that was relevant to the author or the actual subject at hand.

The conversation drifted into entirely different territory, touching on gold-diggers and other completely unrelated nonsense.

You don't need to take it personally when an officer removes an off-topic post, nor should you start a whole new thread about it. These guidelines have been in place since the beginning.

Feel free to be as witty and unrestrained as you like, provided you stay within the scope of the topic.

There was really no need to launch a thread questioning whether the rules had changed just because you felt slighted when someone deleted one of your threads that you personally considered to be "unfiltered" or funny.

A private message would have sufficed.

Regarding the moderator's workload, I was actually referring to your habit of starting threads on this forum specifically to interrogate the staff's motives or their moderation techniques.

But that’s beside the point.

The bottom line is that no new rules have been implemented; everything remains exactly as it always has been.
mistyseal8 mistyseal8 Member
44 messages
joined Apr 2014
#7 ·
Sarah Sanders34 said:Are you talking about those recent threads where a small group just goes completely off-topic and starts having their own little inside jokes that nobody else gets?

If you're going to keep coming back to call out the mods in these philosophical discussions, please be specific and give us an actual example.😁

Is that really such a massive crime? There’s a balance between order and chaos, and a decent moderator knows how to tell the difference. Besides, this forum isn't the New York Times—you shouldn't need an iron fist to run it.
Joshua Jones13 Joshua Jones13 Active Member
69 messages
joined Jun 2006
#8 ·
mistyseal8 said:So, is that somehow a massive evil? There’s a balance between order and chaos, and I guess a decent moderator understands that distinction. Besides, this isn't some heavy-handed political news outlet.

And it isn't being run with an iron fist. It’s not sterile, nor is it overly strict, but I don't think we should just let toxicity spread unchecked.

The rules haven't changed, and there hasn't been any sudden shift in how things are moderated.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads