CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Petition for Black Velvet

Petition for Black Velvet

Started by Nicholas Williams7 · · 👁 6 views · 34 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Nicholas Williams7graniteridge6Rachel Hughes46Peter Thompson5lonegull16Tyler Cruz32Jeffrey Bennett77John Davis12Austin Harris8Larry Wilson25steelhound35David Foster80Jacob Cook16Larry Walker24Michelle Long6Brandon Lopez6Nathan Moore6Jose Ruiz2Nicole Morgan55Dennis Davis5rustydrifter10Joseph Clark37Michelle RodriguezDennis Jackson38 …
Nicholas Williams7 Nicholas Williams7 MemberOP
48 messages
joined Jan 2013
#1 ·
I noticed that one of my favorite ladies on here is asking for an unban. I wasn't really following the thread, but she probably got banned at someone's specific request. Given these new rules where permissions aren't being handed out or revoked like they used to be, I honestly think Black Velvet should be considered an exception. To me, this new policy feels pretty mindless 🙂
graniteridge6 graniteridge6 Active Member
53 messages
joined Apr 2013
#2 ·
Signature. 🎉🎉🎉
Rachel Hughes46 Rachel Hughes46 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jan 2013
#3 ·
I’m totally with you on this one. Honestly, I really think we should make an exception just this once 😁
Peter Thompson5 Peter Thompson5 Newcomer
4 messages
joined May 2013
#4 ·
Totally agree. Velvet is one of the best people on this board

And honestly, I don't get the logic behind this rule—why wouldn't you want to ban people who aren't even being problematic and are literally asking to be banned themselves? What's the point?
Is it because this forum is supposed to be some massive, high-stakes institution or something? 🙄

E: Also, what about everyone who requested a ban before the rules were changed? Yeah, yeah, I know, "it's their own fault." But seriously, this kind of "tough love" approach to enforcement is just brilliant.
lonegull16 lonegull16 Member
17 messages
joined Aug 2021
#5 ·
I’ll throw my hat in the ring too. 👋
Tyler Cruz32 Tyler Cruz32 Active Member
50 messages
joined Oct 2012
#6 ·
+1 🙂
Jeffrey Bennett77 Jeffrey Bennett77 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jun 2013
#7 ·
The little 😁 is actually pretty solid. Bring her back.
The admins have gone back on their word more times than I can count—this is just another instance of them doing exactly that. Pretty sure it won't be the last time either...
John Davis12 John Davis12 Member
14 messages
joined May 2012
#8 ·
I'm with you on this. If that's the same girl who used to go by Black Velvet with some numbers after her name, then yeah, I think so.
We definitely clashed a bit when I first started hanging out on these forums, but honestly? She's actually alright...👍
graniteridge6 graniteridge6 Active Member
53 messages
joined Apr 2013
#9 ·
Nicole Garcia33 said:I’m with you—if she’s the one who used to go by Black Velvet along with some random numbers, then yeah, that sounds right.
Back when I first started hanging out on these boards, we actually bumped heads a bit, but honestly? She’s a good person...👍

Yeah, yeah, that’s definitely her. 🙂

Personally speaking, she’s one of the more high-quality contributors here—one of the real deal—and it’s a genuine shame to see her facing a ban. If I had to guess, I suspect she actually asked for the ban herself—she isn't exactly the type to go around collecting trouble 😁—and I felt terrible seeing her account turn gray.
If there is any silver lining to be found, it's that her status changed just before the new rules kicked in. 🙂🙂🙂
Austin Harris8 Austin Harris8 Member
17 messages
joined Sep 2012
#10 ·
I still remember her—she was a top-tier debater who always kept things rational. Why on earth did she even ask to be banned (if that’s even what happened)? Fine, whatever, she’s banned, but now they’re just refusing to lift it or something?

🤔
Nicholas Williams7 Nicholas Williams7 MemberOP
48 messages
joined Jan 2013
#11 ·
I’m thinking maybe she just fell in love. You know how it goes—she decides to go all-in on the relationship and vanishes from the forum threads to focus on her partner. It happens, right? 😁

But now she’s looking to make a comeback, and I see two ways this plays out:
Either the relationship went south, and she wants to start a new thread to vent and get some emotional support from her buddies here on the board 😳

Or, she’s actually happy and just wants to share the good news with the group. 😍

Just ban Blackie already. 🙂
Larry Wilson25 Larry Wilson25 Active Member
74 messages
joined Jan 2018
#12 ·
Hey, this one is for Nice 🙂 🙂 😘 if they ban Blackie, I’m totally taking her side over ZK—I'll stand with her against any homophobes, period. 😍 😁
steelhound35 steelhound35 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Nov 2012
#13 ·
Black Velvet requested her own ban, so the fact that the rules have changed shouldn't impact her being unbanned.

Come on, admin team, I don't see why we're still waiting.
David Foster80 David Foster80 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2008
#14 ·
I mean, look, people are always finding ways to bypass or strip away certain permissions anyway. I don't see why we shouldn't just meet her halfway on this one.
Jacob Cook16 Jacob Cook16 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jul 2013
#15 ·
I am in full agreement! 🙂
Larry Walker24 Larry Walker24 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2022
#16 ·
I'm with you on this one.
Michelle Long6 Michelle Long6 Member
23 messages
joined May 2013
#17 ·
Count me in too. Velvet, hey there 👋
Brandon Lopez6 Brandon Lopez6 Regular
656 messages
joined Feb 2010
#18 ·
+1 from me too
Nathan Moore6 Nathan Moore6 Active Member
65 messages
joined Jul 2018
#19 ·
+1
Jose Ruiz2 Jose Ruiz2 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Aug 2011
#20 ·
Nicholas Williams7 said:I noticed one of my favorite members here is asking for a ban reversal. I wasn't really following the situation, but she probably got banned on personal request. Given these new rules where permissions aren't being handed out or revoked anymore, I think Roger Martin3 should be an exception. To me, this new rule feels pretty stupid.🙂

Look, if the new rules state we don't grant or strip permissions upon request anymore, then fine. If they took her permissions away, they'd be breaking their own rules. I don't see why Roger Martin3 should get special treatment; she isn't the only high-quality member on this board.
So, no, the permissions won't be pulled because that would violate the forum rules. You guys are wasting your breath.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads