CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Lab results - looking for opinions [PLEASE READ 1ST POST]

Started by vividsailor7 · · 👁 31 views · 3.9K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants vividsailor7redcrane22Sandra Rivera37swiftbear86melloworca6Dana Martin87ironskipper80mellowgardener15goldenmarlin6analogbison13Nicholas Myersstormygardener34Roger RodriguezDonna Mitchell3Kenneth Vaughn2Laura Ward98briskseal32Susan Vaughn46Zachary Lewis4driftingmason52rustyheron55Laura Chavez47vividstag24lonecanyon8 …
Austin Jones3 Austin Jones3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2012
#261 ·
Could someone please take a look at these results and offer some perspective on what I might be facing? I would truly appreciate any insight.

RBC 5.73 H (4.34-5.42)
MCV 79.8 L ( 80.0-97.2)
MCHC 35.4 H ( 32.0-34.5)
PLT 157 L ( 158-424)
LY: 51.3H (0.0-49.0)


Everything else appears to be within the standard range.
WBC= 5.4
HGB: 16.2
HCT: 45.7
MCH: 28.3
MO:2.6
GR:46.1
RDW: 10.0
PCT:0.11
MPV:7.1
PDW: 17.7
ruggedorca46 ruggedorca46 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2012
#262 ·
Quick question for you guys—if my urine culture hasn't come back after three days, does that basically mean something is definitely growing in there?😢 ?
Jamie Wells83 Jamie Wells83 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2012
#263 ·
I could use some help here,
Female/34yo.
Instead of typing out my entire blood panel and urinalysis, I’ll just list the values that are actually off.
BLOOD: .
RBC 4.28 (4.34-5.72)
HEMOGLOBIN 117 (138-175)
HEMATOCRIT 0.325 (0.415-0.530)
MCV 78.5 (83-97.2)
MCH 26.6 (27.4-33.9)
MCHC 348 (320-345)
RDW 15.7 (9-15)
PLATELETS 156 (158-424)

K-SE 18 (2-13)

IRON 5 (11-32)
UIBC 75 (25-54)

URINALYSIS:
RBC/HEMOGLOBIN +++ (00-00)
PROTEINS ++ (00-00)
LEUKOCYTE ESTERASE + (00-00)
WBC 23 (00-3)
RBC 405 (00-2)
BACTERIA SIGNIFICANT (0-0)

Context—I have kidney stones. I had ESWL done just four days before this blood and urine work was taken. I also finished a course of antibiotics (Cipro, 500mg twice a day for 10 days) about seven days before the tests.
Look, I'm not worried about the high red blood cell count in the urine—that makes sense given the stones—but I am wondering why my white cell count is up, why there's protein, and how I can have "significant" bacteria when I literally just finished an antibiotic course (which was prescribed preventatively because I have a stent in my ureter). My regular doctor isn't available, and the locum who covered for her basically just told me we'd re-run the urine test in 15 days. To top it all off, I'm dealing with a massive yeast infection that flared up right after the antibiotics. For the low iron, my doctor put me on a supplement twice a day and called it a day. Can anyone break these results down for me? Specifically, is there any link between anemia and kidney stones, and is it possible for my urine results to be this messy because of the stones?
Thanks in advance.
vividsailor7 vividsailor7 Active MemberOP
217 messages
joined Sep 2011
#264 ·
Nancy Garcia4 As I was saying:
My apologies. I finally saw the urologist, and here’s the verdict:
External genitalia: an outwardly clean result.
He sent me to get this done. KKS, GUK, lipid panel, urinalysis, LH, FSH, testosterone, and a semen culture. So, I’m supposed to just show up for my follow-up appointment once the lab results actually come back. That's the plan, anyway.

Alright, here is the complete transcript of all the findings we've gathered so far:
...

Low-fat diets. Seriously? People still think they can just strip all the fats out of their meals and call it a health revolution. It’s such a tired, outdated concept that ignores how our bodies actually function. You can't just run on nothing but celery sticks and hope for the best!
Looking at the organic side of things, there aren't any clinical signs of an underlying disorder that would be causing impotence.
Based on the clinical indications, we need to beef up the testing. I want a full sperm analysis added to the works, along with total and free testosterone levels, Prolactin (PRL), and Estradiol (E2). Let's get it done.

ruggedorca46 said:Just a quick question here: if my urine culture results aren't back after three days, does that pretty much guarantee something is growing in there?😢 ?

It’s a bit of both, really. Honestly? It's complicated.

Jamie Wells83 said:I’m asking for some help here...

We need to get the US labs synced up with the ABG results immediately. We’re looking at the full panel—KKS, CRP, creatinine, urea, urates, and a urine analysis. I want everything repeated in one to two weeks to see where we stand.
And don't forget, I've got a follow-up appointment with the urologist on the books, which includes a kidney ultrasound.
Tyler Booth3 Tyler Booth3 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2011
#265 ·
I need some thoughts on these results and advice on what to do next:

Male, 32.
Lately, I've been feeling a burning sensation when I pee, especially after climaxing. My libido has also tanked. As soon as I noticed this, I started drinking various urological herbal teas (cranberry, marshmallow root, sage, lovage, you name it...) and these tests were done while I was still taking them.
I'm also pretty prone to yeast infections on my genitals.
I'm in a monogamous relationship and stay on top of hygiene.

URINALYSIS RESULTS (bold values indicate abnormal findings)
Physical-chemical exam:
Appearance cloudy
Color yellow
pH 5.5 (5.5-9.0)
Specific Gravity 1.025 (1.005-1.030)
Glucose 0 ( Bilirubin 0 (0)
Ketones 0 ( Ery/hemoglobin 0 ( Protein 0 ( Urobilinogen normal ( Nitrites negative (0)
Leukocyte esterase 0 (
Microscopic sediment exam:
Leukocytes 1-2 (0-2)
Erythrocytes 0-1 (0-2)
Squamous epithelial cells 1-2 (0-1)
Small epithelial cells 0 (0-1)
Hyaline casts 0 (0-1)
Granular casts (coarse) 0 (0)
Granular casts (fine) 0 (0)
Waxy casts 0 (0)
Bacteria few (0/neg)
Mucus many (0/neg)
Yeast neg (0/neg)
Crystals neg (0/neg)
Salts neg (0/neg)

EJACULATE MICROBIOLOGY TEST RESULTS (Nov 21st)
- aerobic bacteriology
- sterile
Microscopic prep: 2-5 polymorphonuclear leukocytes visible per large field.

Right before the ejaculate test, my doctor put me on a three-day course of Azithromycin (because I had a bad cough with green mucus that lasted a while; the antibiotics helped the cough, but it hasn't fully cleared—I’m still coughing up clear mucus).

Even after the microbiology test and the antibiotics, I still feel a mild burning—more like numbness in the urethra—though it doesn't burn after climaxing anymore. My libido is still extremely low, though.
Nancy Garcia4 Nancy Garcia4 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Nov 2012
#266 ·
vividsailor7 said:A low-fat diet.
From an organic standpoint, there aren't any signs of a clinical disorder that would cause impotence.
If clinically indicated, follow up by adding a semen analysis, along with total and free testosterone, plus PRL and E2.

Many thanks to vividsailor7.
vividsailor7 vividsailor7 Active MemberOP
217 messages
joined Sep 2011
#267 ·
Tyler Booth3 said:Please, I need some input on these results. What should my next move be?

..............
Also, after finishing the microbiological testing of the ejaculate (meaning I was off antibiotics), I’m still dealing with this persistent, mild burning sensation—more like a numbness in the urethra, actually. It doesn't burn right after climaxing, though my libido is still completely shot.

Was the ejaculate culture performed while under the influence of Azithromycin, or specifically, how many days had passed since the last dose of Azithromycin before the test was done?
The urine analysis came back clean.
Tyler Booth3 Tyler Booth3 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2011
#268 ·
vividsailor7 said:Was the semen culture done while on the ABG azithromycin regimen? Basically, how many days after the dose was the test performed?
My urine results came back clean.

It was done after the azithromycin. I think it was about three days later. I finished my last round on Sunday afternoon and gave the sample Wednesday morning.
vividsailor7 vividsailor7 Active MemberOP
217 messages
joined Sep 2011
#269 ·
Tyler Booth3 said:The sample was taken after the azithromycin, and I think it was on day three (I finished my last round on Sunday afternoon and provided the ejaculate for testing on Wednesday morning)

Man, that’s cutting it way too close. If it were me, I’d wait at least seven full days after finishing any antibiotics before doing any kind of microbiological screening—whether it’s a throat swab, a UTI test, an ejaculate sample, or whatever else. You need that buffer!
Tyler Booth3 Tyler Booth3 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2011
#270 ·
vividsailor7 said:That’s a bit late. Personally, I’d wait at least a week after finishing antibiotics before doing any kind of culture test—like a throat swab, a urine test, or an ejaculate sample, etc.

So what am I supposed to do now? My doctor didn't mention anything about waiting to get tested after being on antibiotics...
I still feel issues in my urinary tract, just not as intense as they were at first. My wife actually chewed me out because I jumped straight into drinking urological teas instead of getting tested first, since that could mess up the results. But if I had waited, I would've been in pain for over two weeks.😢
melloworca6 melloworca6 Regular
551 messages
joined May 2010
#271 ·
vividsailor7 said:It’s a bit late, honestly. If I were you, I’d wait at least a full week after finishing up any antibiotics before trying any microbe tests—like a throat swab, testing in the USA, or an ejaculate sample. You don't want skewed results.

Wait, isn't the window actually two weeks? That's what I was told. Apparently, you need a fourteen-day gap between your last dose of antibiotics and running a repeat swab.🤷
vividsailor7 vividsailor7 Active MemberOP
217 messages
joined Sep 2011
#272 ·
Tyler Booth3 said:So what am I supposed to do now? My doctor didn't bother warning me to wait before getting another culture after finishing my antibiotics...
I’m still dealing with urinary tract issues, just not quite as intense as they were at the start... My wife absolutely chewed me out because I immediately started drinking those herbal bladder teas instead of going in for testing first—knowing full well that could mess up the results. But honestly? If I hadn't, I would have been stuck in agony for over two weeks.😢

As always, take your lab results back to your primary care physician and make sure you mention you just finished a course of antibiotics.
I honestly don't get how she failed to warn you.🤷

melloworca6 said:Isn't that two-week window? That's what I was told—that there needs to be a two-week gap between the last dose of antibiotics and a repeat swab.🤷

In a perfect world, yes.
But in practice, it rarely works out that way.
Tyler Booth3 Tyler Booth3 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2011
#273 ·
thanks for the replies
nah, probably just forgot 😢
Nicholas Myers Nicholas Myers Active Member
163 messages
joined Jan 2012
#274 ·
melloworca6 said:Isn't there a two-week window? That's what I was told—you need at least two weeks between finishing antibiotics and getting a new swab test. 🤷

Exactly. You need at least two weeks after the antibiotics are done.

Otherwise, the results aren't reliable and you're just throwing money down the drain.
Nicholas Myers Nicholas Myers Active Member
163 messages
joined Jan 2012
#275 ·
Juicy, your post has been moved to the thread EEG - interpreting results (click the link).
Noah Williams82 Noah Williams82 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Dec 2012
#276 ·
So, about a month ago, I went in for my routine physical checkup—just one of those standard annual things you do to stay on top of everything.
Here’s what the lab results looked like:

Hematology Panel

leukocyte 7.0 (4-11)
RBC 4.41 (3.9-6.1)
Hemoglobin 135 (120-180)
Hematocrit 0.397 (0.35-0.50)
MCV 89.9 (76-96)
MCH 30.5 (27-32)
MCHC 339 (310-360)
Platelets 215 (100-440)

Biochemistry Panel

Glucose 4.8 (3.6-6.1)
Creatinine 76 ( Cholesterol 5.2 ( Triglycerides 1.4 ( HDL Cholesterol 1.3 (>1.0)

Iron 37.2 (8-30)

My doctor suggested I get retested because that iron level was a bit high. Well, fast forward a month, and here is the follow-up:

Iron 52 (8-30)
UIBC 10 (26-59)
TIBC 62 (49-75)
Ferritin 42 (10-120)

I'm 44 years old, and I also deal with hypothyroidism—you know, that whole thyroid struggle.

I would love to hear your thoughts on this,

thanks so much.
Raymond Price4 Raymond Price4 Member
13 messages
joined Feb 2010
#277 ·
Could someone help me make sense of these diagnoses? It's for a 66-year-old male.

-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with ventricular tachycardia
-medication-induced cardioversion
-decompensated liver cirrhosis (I know this one—cirrhosis)
-pancytopenia, suspected hypersplenism
-ascites
-chronic alcoholism (also know this one)

thanks
vividsailor7 vividsailor7 Active MemberOP
217 messages
joined Sep 2011
#278 ·
Noah Williams82 said:I had my routine blood work done about a month ago—just one of those standard physicals you get done to keep tabs on everything.
Here are the results:

Hematology tests.

...........

I’m looking for some input here. What do you all think?

Thanks.

We could be talking about hemochromatosis.
We need to handle this from that angle.

Sophia Gonzalez79 said:I’m looking for some help interpreting these diagnoses. We're talking about a 66-year-old male.

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation accompanied by ventricular tachycardia.
Let’s talk about conversio medicamentosa—because apparently, we need to address this mess again. It’s one of those clinical concepts that sounds sophisticated on paper, but in practice? It can be an absolute nightmare if you aren't paying close attention to the transition. We’re talking about the shift from one medication to another, often moving from an intravenous route to oral, or switching between different classes of drugs entirely. It isn't just about swapping pills; it's about managing the physiological bridge between them. If you don't nail the timing or the dosage conversion, you're basically playing Russian roulette with the patient's stability. You have to account for bioavailability, half-lives, and how the body is actually going to process that switch. It’s not a simple math equation where you just move a decimal point and call it a day. You have to be precise, or you’re looking at a massive therapeutic gap or, even worse, toxicity. Get it right, and the patient stabilizes. Get it wrong, and you're dealing with a crisis that could have been avoided with a little more diligence. It’s basic pharmacology, yet I see people treating it like a suggestion rather than a rule. Pay attention!
Decompensated cirrhosis of the liver. (I know this one—liver cirrhosis.)
Pancytopenia. Hypersplenism, suspected.
Ascites. It’s one of those medical terms that sounds almost clinical and detached until you actually have to deal with the reality of it. It isn't just "bloating." It's a massive, relentless accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity that can turn a person's life upside down in a matter of days. It’s frustrating because it feels like a constant battle against your own body. One day you feel okay, and the next, the pressure is so intense it’s physically painful, making it hard to even take a full breath. You look in the mirror and don't recognize the silhouette staring back at you. And then there's the management side of things—the endless cycle of diuretics, the salt restrictions that feel impossible to maintain, and the looming shadow of whether a paracentesis is going to be necessary just to get some temporary relief. It’s exhausting. It’s not just a symptom; it’s an overwhelming physical burden that demands your entire attention.
And let’s not even get started on the term "aethylismus"—which, for those who don't speak the language, is just a fancy way of saying chronic alcoholism. I know exactly what that implies.

Thanks!

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation accompanied by ventricular tachycardia. So, let me get this straight—we’re talking about paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. It isn't constant; it's hitting in waves. You've got that AFib triggering ventricular arrhythmia, which basically means the heart's lower chambers are reacting way too fast to the chaos upstairs. It's an absolute mess of electrical signals.
Let’s talk about conversio medicamentosa—because clearly, some people think you can just swap pills like they're trading baseball cards without a second thought. It’s not just a simple "switch"; it’s a calculated, high-stakes transition that requires actual precision. You aren't just moving from one medication to another because it's convenient; you are managing a delicate physiological balance. If you mess up the math on the dosage conversion, you aren't just making a minor error—you're potentially putting someone in the hospital. It’s frustrating how often this nuance gets glossed over in casual conversation. Get it right, or don't do it at all. The fibrillation was successfully converted back to sinus rhythm via medication—meaning we've managed to get the heart rhythm stabilized using drugs.
Decompensated liver cirrhosis. (I know this one—liver cirrhosis.) Decompensated liver cirrhosis is a complete nightmare. It’s not just "having a bad liver" anymore—it’s when the organ essentially throws in the towel and stops being able to manage the body's basic survival functions. We aren't talking about minor issues here; we are talking about a total systemic breakdown. When you reach this stage, the scarring is so advanced that the liver can no longer perform its critical duties. You start seeing the terrifying complications that make everyone realize how serious this really is. We’re talking about ascites—that massive, painful fluid buildup in the abdomen—and hepatic encephalopathy, where toxins actually hit the brain and leave you confused or unresponsive. Then there's the bleeding risks from esophageal varices, which can be fatal in an instant. It is a brutal, aggressive progression. Once the liver hits this level of decompensation, the prognosis shifts dramatically. It’s no longer about managing symptoms; it becomes a desperate fight against multi-organ failure. It is heavy, it is scary, and it is incredibly high-stakes.
The labs just came back, and frankly, I’m fuming. We’re looking at pancytopenia and a strong suspicion of hypersplenism. It’s one of those situations that just sets my teeth on edge because of how much guesswork is involved. You see the numbers dropping across the board—red cells, white cells, platelets—and you know the spleen is likely acting like a rogue vacuum cleaner, sucking everything up before it can actually do its job. It’s frustrating to deal with this kind of diagnostic ambiguity when you just want clear answers. Everything is tanking. My blood work just came back, and every single parameter—white blood cell count, platelets, red blood cells—is down across the board. On top of that, there’s a suspicion that my spleen is enlarged. This is exactly what I was worried about.
Ascites. Just one word, but it’s enough to make anyone's blood boil. It’s not just some minor medical nuisance you can brush off with an aspirin; it is a relentless, aggressive accumulation of fluid that turns your abdomen into a drum. It’s exhausting, it’s uncomfortable, and frankly, it’s infuriating how much it disrupts your entire existence. You feel heavy, you feel bloated, and you feel like your own body is working against you every single second of the day. It’s a constant battle against pressure and discomfort that most people simply don't understand until they're staring down the barrel of it themselves. Free fluid in the abdomen.
Look, I’m well aware of what we’re talking about here—alcoholism. Let's call it what it is.
If you want a more thorough answer, you’re going to have to cough up some actual data first. I can't pull specifics out of thin air.
Noah Williams82 Noah Williams82 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Dec 2012
#279 ·
vividsailor7 said:It could potentially be hemochromatosis.
You really ought to get some testing done to look into that.


Thanks for getting back to me, LP.
Kate Collins67 Kate Collins67 Active Member
168 messages
joined Apr 2010
#280 ·
His ferritin levels are way too low for hemochromatosis, right?

There’s this weird finding in the results that doesn't fit the standard textbook patterns—you could easily write it off as some insignificant outlier or just a medical curiosity.

Unless, of course, she's been dealing with heavy periods her entire life.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads