CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › The privileged elite: (For the nth time) we aren't all equal

The privileged elite: (For the nth time) we aren't all equal

Started by Anthony Barrett37 · · 👁 7 views · 26 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Anthony Barrett37rustydrifter10Daniel Ward87vividtiger922Austin Baker86rapidnomad7Edward Young3Brian Edwards6Matthew Anderson4Elizabeth Gomez3Joshua Parker11loneraven25
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#21 ·
Brian Edwards6 said:Are you seriously trying to tell me that police officers—and yeah, I’m throwing myself into that group here too—are basically just running on pre-programmed scripts?🤔

No, wait—I think you might have missed my point there! I was actually referring specifically to the robots, or even just presenting that as its own standalone fact. 😁 If I actually wanted to suggest that you were being driven by nothing more than a bunch of programmed scripts, then I would have tucked that little aside right into the part of the sentence where those scripts were actually mentioned!
Matthew Anderson4 Matthew Anderson4 Regular
598 messages
joined Jun 2013
#22 ·
rustydrifter10 said:Gött used to be a model, so he still carries that vibe. She still gets a few little perks, like being able to hit up the admin directly if she wants to swap her handle.

What's up?

rustydrifter10 said:Could be someone who was a mod back in 2002. They lost their admin access and aren't even recognized by the purple badges anymore. In that case, they might actually expect him to check in on the thread first.

Hmm.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#23 ·
Matthew Anderson4 said:Wait, what?

Hmm.

I don't think everyone is actually holding onto every single tiny little perk out there. Honestly, those things are such small, trivial details that they aren't even worth our time, let alone needing a formal set of written guidelines just to manage them.
Elizabeth Gomez3 Elizabeth Gomez3 Member
15 messages
joined Aug 2010
#24 ·
Look at this... this user's handle (it went from "Götterdämmerung" to "Göttspöđä") has changed quite significantly... the two have almost nothing in common now (which is a clear violation of the rules), yet my own request to change my number... from 21 to 23... was rejected. The reasoning provided was that I should just wait a year and ask for 24... honestly, give me a break... 🙄
Joshua Parker11 Joshua Parker11 Member
25 messages
joined Feb 2010
#25 ·
Elizabeth Gomez3 said:Look, here's the deal... this username (it went from basically "Godzilla" to "Gosh-darn") changed way too much... the two names barely even relate anymore... which is totally against the rules. Meanwhile, my request to change my number from 21 to 23 got shot down. They actually told me I have to wait until next year to ask for 24. Like... seriously? Give me a break. 🙄

🤣🤣

This is too good to be true.😂
Elizabeth Gomez3 Elizabeth Gomez3 Member
15 messages
joined Aug 2010
#26 ·
....and naturally, nobody is going to say a word about this... expected ☕
loneraven25 loneraven25 Active Member
77 messages
joined Jul 2013
#27 ·
...honestly, I feel like everything that needs to be said has already been laid out on the table...
Elizabeth Gomez3 said:...with the whole explanation about how I'll be demanding 24 bucks an hour by next year...

...but hey, there's always that slim chance you might get tapped to moderate, provided you change your handle to something more like 'Junior Executive Level'...
😬

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads