CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › I got permabanned from the rec league

I got permabanned from the rec league

Started by Tyler Ross86 · · 👁 7 views · 57 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Tyler Ross86David Jonesrestlesstiger102gentlestag2wiredharbor22Jose James15Jason Campbell70AKyle King4Austin Gonzalez13goldenfox24Henry Cox78brisknomad6crimsonsailor7fadedsailor57Chloe Wells5Tyler Bishop56slycrane94Arthur Baker6Steven Reedjadetiger25hollowtrucker77
Tyler Ross86 Tyler Ross86 MemberOP
17 messages
joined Nov 2011
#41 ·
gentlestag2 said:Btw, did you catch any of the admins stepping up? Like, did anyone actually look into that whole "Lyla" situation?

Nah. Honestly, any one of them could’ve seen it coming just by looking at all the complaints and threads calling out her work—but nothing moved an inch from the starting line. Not a single solid response from an admin, nothing to show they even cared about the mess... but man, you could tell immediately. Writing stuff on those complaint threads is basically just a massive waste of breath at this point.

Which subforum is more interesting—politics or religion? 😁
Tyler Ross86 Tyler Ross86 MemberOP
17 messages
joined Nov 2011
#42 ·
The playground gossip thread

Anyone who wasn't invited to the group outing—basically all you haters and losers—can drop their comments about the meetup photos right here. 😍
Chloe Wells5 Chloe Wells5 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2009
#43 ·
Tyler Ross86 said:Data wall

Anyone deemed "unwelcome" or merely "less than ideal" can leave their comments on the members' vacation photos right here. 😍

Because of you people—who exist solely to provoke—I’m done posting on this forum.
Tyler Bishop56 Tyler Bishop56 Member
43 messages
joined Dec 2007
#44 ·
Chloe Wells5 said:I'm done posting on this forum because you guys just love to provoke me.

Tyler Ross86, go jump in a lake. Look at what you've done now.
Tyler Ross86 Tyler Ross86 MemberOP
17 messages
joined Nov 2011
#45 ·
Chloe Wells5 said:Honestly, I’m done. I am officially checking out of this forum because you people just can't help yourselves—it’s nothing but constant provocation from here on out.

Look, we’re being perfectly reasonable here. Seriously. So, what gives? Why hasn't your son even bothered to acknowledge a simple hello?
Tyler Bishop56 said:Tyler Ross86, go straight to hell. Seriously, just look at the absolute mess you’ve made now.

I’m not the one to blame just because they decided to shut down Chloe Wells5's "friendly" little greetings...
Look, Chloe Wells5, you can go ahead and file your grievance right here if you want. Honestly, the mods mess up more often than they’d ever admit—it happens all the time. But once you actually call them out on their nonsense? They usually realize they've screwed up pretty quickly, perform their little "mea culpa" ritual to save face, and then finally get things sorted out. ☕
slycrane94 slycrane94 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2002
#46 ·
Tyler Ross86 said:No. It was obvious from all the complaints and threads criticizing her work, yet nothing ever changed. Not a single concrete response from the admins or anything suggesting they actually cared about the issue... though that part was pretty clear. Writing those complaints felt like a total waste of time.

Which subforum is more engaging, politics or religion? 😁

Keep in mind there are barely any admins compared to the massive amount of forums here. There's no way they can monitor every single thread where someone is filing a complaint. If the majority of moderators on a board agree on a penalty, what chance does an admin have of going against them?
Arthur Baker6 Arthur Baker6 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Dec 2009
#47 ·
slycrane94 said:Keep in mind that we have very few admins compared to how massive this forum is. There is zero chance they can monitor every single thread where someone is filing a complaint. If most, or even all, of the moderators on a specific board agree on a penalty, there's hardly any chance the head admin is going to step in and go against their consensus.

But if a ton of people are complaining about a specific moderator—especially if she keeps handing out bans or those 500-point penalties for absolutely nothing—then management really needs to pay attention and take an objective look at what's actually happening.🤷
slycrane94 slycrane94 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2002
#48 ·
Arthur Baker6 said:but if a whole crowd starts complaining about a specific moderator who just keeps handing out bans and massive point penalties for nothing, shouldn't management actually step in and look at the facts?🤷

If the other mods aren't raising red flags, what chance does the admin have of noticing anything? Even if they did notice, the pattern here is that leadership stays out of moderation unless things get truly extreme or the rest of the team agrees it's gone too far.

The people on the ground know the vibe of this forum way better than some admin sitting in an office, so 99% of the time, we're stuck following whatever the moderators decide.
Arthur Baker6 Arthur Baker6 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Dec 2009
#49 ·
slycrane94 said:If the other mods aren't raising any red flags, there’s almost zero chance the admin is going to notice. Even if they do catch wind of something, the standard practice is to stay out of moderation unless things get truly extreme or the rest of the team agrees that someone’s gone way overboard.

The people handling moderation over there have a much better handle on the forum's vibe than the admin does, so 99% of the time, we just follow the moderators' lead.

But then what's the point of you guys even being here? Mods usually stick together and won't call out one of their own for dropping the ball.🙄
slycrane94 slycrane94 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2002
#50 ·
Arthur Baker6 said:but then you’re just existing for no reason. Moderators usually stick together; they aren't going to turn around and call one of their own a failure.🙄

If they’re in agreement, then from an admin perspective, everything is fine by definition. It would be just as surprising if they never disagreed at all. There’s no conspiracy here.
Besides, very few users actually have issues with the mods, and I highly doubt the moderation team is always the culprit behind every problem being discussed here.
Steven Reed Steven Reed Regular
354 messages
joined Dec 2014
#51 ·
slycrane94 said:If everyone agrees, then by definition, the admin team is doing its job perfectly. Conversely—and just as surprisingly—there are plenty of times when they don't agree at all. There’s no grand conspiracy here.
Furthermore, a tiny fraction of users have issues with moderators; I highly doubt the mods are always the culprits in every single dispute being discussed here.

I concur—but isn't there even a microscopic chance that a moderator actually messed up? 🤷
The possibility that someone handed out an excessive penalty for a minor "offense" is still on the table. 🤷
I ask this because, in my subjective view—much like how lylin's subjective view is that such a comment is worth 500 points—a 500-point penalty for a single sentence from William seems a bit steep.

edit: apologies Tyler Ross86 for crashing your thread, but we are talking about the exact same moderator. 😉
Tyler Ross86 Tyler Ross86 MemberOP
17 messages
joined Nov 2011
#52 ·
Steven Reed I can't even begin to wrap my head around what they're saying here—it’s just total nonsense! Honestly, I feel like I'm losing brain cells just trying to process this level of sheer stupidity. It's one thing to be wrong, but it's another thing entirely to be this confidently, aggressively incorrect about something so basic. It's like watching someone try to drive a car through a lake and then getting mad at the water for being too wet—just completely disconnected from reality! Seriously, how does anyone actually fall for this kind of logic? It makes zero sense!
My bad, Tyler Ross86—sorry for crashing your thread like this, but we’re talking about the exact same mod here. 😉

Look, honestly, I can break down William's whole situation way easier in just a few quick sentences. 👍
slycrane94 I can't even begin to wrap my head around what was just said—honestly, it’s like watching someone try to drive a car with no steering wheel. It’s absolute chaos! I mean, seriously, how does anyone look at this kind of logic and think, "Yeah, this is fine"? It makes zero sense! It's like if you tried to build a skyscraper out of wet cardboard—you might get it up for a second, but one tiny breeze and the whole thing is a total disaster. We're talking about fundamental stuff here, people! You can't just ignore the basics and expect everything to work out perfectly. It's frustrating, it's exhausting, and quite frankly, it's just plain ridiculous. Anyone with half a brain can see where this is headed, and trust me, it isn't anywhere good!
If the other mods aren't making a scene about it, there’s basically zero chance the admin is even gonna notice.
Honestly, the mods over here actually get the vibe of this forum way better than the admin does—like, seriously. In like 99% of cases, we’re basically just following the moderators' lead because they actually understand how this place works.

Honestly, nobody would even be raising an eyebrow if I decided to drag all the shady stuff Lyla has pulled out into the open—just serving up her entire track record of nonsense to the other mods in the private lounge. She’d be kicked off the team before she could even blink. 🤷 Look, here’s the deal—Lyla and TincH just flat-out refused to acknowledge any of the good stuff I’ve been bringing to this subforum. They completely ignored my contributions—like, total radio silence—and they wouldn't be caught dead noticing how much I've actually stepped up my game over the last two weeks. And honestly? They *should* have noticed, because that’s literally what they get paid to do. But no. Their complexes—and the complexes of a few other colleagues over there—are just massive. They’ve proven that time and time again... it’s like their egos are inflated for absolutely no reason at all.

I’d bet my bottom dollar that Lyla only landed that moderator gig because she pulled some serious strings behind the scenes—because let’s be real, everyone here knows she’s absolutely terrible at it. It can't just be a coincidence that there are endless threads, constant drama, and basically every single person on this board tearing her management style to shreds. It’s getting ridiculous. There are so many people in this community who actually give a damn and would step up to do the job properly if they were given half a chance. Seriously, what is the actual hold-up? Why is it so hard to just swap out a moderator who isn't a total disaster?
slycrane94 slycrane94 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2002
#53 ·
Elizabeth Anderson63 said:I agree, but isn't there a slight chance the moderator actually messed up? 🤷
Maybe they handed out a penalty that was way too heavy for whatever "offense" was committed. 🤷
I’m asking because I feel like 500 points for a single sentence like the one Lyla wrote is a bit much—though that’s just my take, much like how Lyla thinks that sentence is worth 500 points.

edit: Sorry Tyler Ross86 for jumping into your thread, but we're talking about the same moderator. 😉

The mistake here was using a warning as a stepping stone to a ban instead of just issuing a direct ban for the same duration. Unfortunately, plenty of mods operate this way, even though I’d prefer they just go straight to a ban for those "last straw" moments. But really, this is more of a pedagogical error than anything serious.
jadetiger25 jadetiger25 Newcomer
1 message
joined Dec 2009
#54 ·
slycrane94 said:But the thing is...

Do you even realize what’s actually happening here? This whole forum is an absolute joke and it needs to be shut down immediately.
Furthermore, since you’re clearly sitting right next to the management, why don't you do us all a favor? Tell the big boss to fire every single decent, fair, and level-headed moderator on the team and replace them with more lunatics, idiots, and bitter losers... because if we're going to go down, let's just let the whole thing burn. 👍
Steven Reed Steven Reed Regular
354 messages
joined Dec 2014
#55 ·
slycrane94 said:The mistake here—if we can call it that—is using a warning card to issue a ban instead of just applying a direct ban of the same length. Unfortunately, quite a few moderators follow this pattern, even though I’d much prefer they just go straight to a direct ban for those "last straw" moments. Still, it’s more of a pedagogical blunder than anything truly egregious.

So, you're essentially agreeing that based on that one sentence, Lyla deserved a 7-day ban—and if I've parsed the permanent ban from the social club correctly, she earned that too???
Because, frankly, I still maintain the punishment is wildly disproportionate to the "offense."
Just to be perfectly clear: William has dealt with bans before—bans that neither he nor anyone in his circle ever questioned (not necessarily because they were always justified, but because they weren't as absurd as this one).
In this specific instance, I truly believe Lyla overstepped; if a single sentence warrants a 500-point deduction and a lifetime ban from the social club, this platform will be a ghost town very soon—though, sadly, nobody will even bother reading that PDF without using bot accounts 😍)
Henry Cox78 Henry Cox78 Regular
286 messages
joined Apr 2011
#56 ·
slycrane94 said:The mistake here was using a warning instead of just hitting them with a direct ban for the same amount of time. Honestly, a lot of mods handle things this way, though I’d much rather see them go straight to a ban when someone finally crosses the line. It's more of a teaching error than anything serious, though.

Maybe you're being a little too hard on the mod. 🙂
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#57 ·
Elizabeth Anderson63 said:So, you’re actually suggesting that William earned a seven-day suspension with that specific sentence, and if I’m reading the fine print correctly, she also got a permanent ban from the social lounge???
I honestly still feel like the punishment is way out of proportion with whatever "offense" was actually committed.
Just so we’re all clear here, William has dealt with bans before—bans that neither she nor anyone in her circle even bothered to contest, not because they were always justified, mind you, but simply because they weren't quite as spectacularly moronic as this current situation.
In this particular instance, I really think Lyla went overboard; if we're talking about handing out 500 points and a lifetime ban from the lounge over a single sentence, this place is going to be an empty shell pretty soon (though, sadly, nobody is going to see that PDF without using a bunch of burner accounts 😍)

If my memory serves me—and since I haven't actually read that PDF, I'm assuming I'm right—that seven-day ban is really just the cumulative result of her previous escapades.
It’s pretty straightforward: a moderator bans someone once, then twice, then a third time... eventually, you get to a point where you're constantly having to clean up after certain people, so you slap them with a longer suspension just to make sure they realize they can't just keep pulling small, annoying stunts to test exactly how much they can get away with before hitting a major sanction.

Since I don't know the gritty details of this specific drama, please just take this rambling of mine as a general observation and an attempt at explaining the logic behind it.
🙂
Steven Reed Steven Reed Regular
354 messages
joined Dec 2014
#58 ·
😍
As far as I can tell, there was one ban issued—which was promptly overturned—followed immediately by a 500-point penalty and a permanent 😍
for the next sentence. So, it’s not exactly like the mods broke a sweat cleaning up the threads—especially since this is just a chat topic.
Even my very first post in this thread was deleted for reasons that remain entirely opaque to me 🤷 (I could only resume posting after I sent a DM to the moderator asking why my posts were being wiped—an inquiry that was met with total silence).

Looking at the whole mess, I find the moderation of this PDF somewhat laughable—at least from certain members—but I find the administration's support of it truly disheartening. They seem content to let the moderator's insults slide while silently, or perhaps not so silently, endorsing this ban against BlackRock.
I assume you all see some higher purpose in this chaos, because frankly, I don't. 🤷 👋

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads