Steven Allen66 said:I actually came across the same interview over at direct.hr, which is what prompted me to put that post together in the first place. Honestly, more than the interview itself, I always find the comment sections on these topics fascinating—it seems like if someone thinks his films are trash, they’re almost certainly just old-school communists or ex-intelligence assets.
Look, if you’re gonna make a claim, back it up with some actual arguments—that's the only way a discussion stays constructive and helps me figure out where you're coming from. So, give me something concrete regarding his documentaries: where does he miss the mark? What exactly is wrong with them? Is he dealing in forgeries or manipulations, or is he just biased? Give me something to work with...
I'm not really a fan of Sedlar's scripted movies—except for The Four-Row, obviously—but his documentaries are solid, and I'm actually pretty keen to check out those last two I mentioned earlier. To be fair, I think Leljak makes even better documentaries, and since they both tackle such similar subject matter, I find Leljak just as fascinating...
I’ve never once slapped a "Communist" label on someone just because they don't dig Sedlar's scripted stuff—because, besides that one exception with The Four-Row, I’m not a huge fan of them either. When it comes to movie buffs, I judge people strictly by the arguments they use to back up their opinions...
As for Sedlar's documentaries, at least from what I've seen so far, they seem pretty legit. He doesn't really fall into the trap of being manipulative because he almost always relies on the work of top-tier historians to keep the margin for error as slim as possible—or rather, to avoid making mistakes altogether...