Rules on deleting and moderating posts

Sean Murphy5 said:The PDF policy is a total disaster, and the moderators are largely to blame for driving it into the ground—the inquisitor really went above and beyond there.😉

It’s hard to see things getting any better when the people who actually had something worthwhile to say have either been kicked out or just walked away themselves.
As for Pesica and the rest of those left-wing hacks, they can go ahead and keep sucking up to Inkvi if they want. 🤣
That Matthias guy actually tried to reform this forum a few times; he wouldn't let the moderators just do whatever they felt like.
He even gave the topic back to quietwolf after actually listening to him and the staff—something that has absolutely never happened here, no matter how much nonsense the mods pull or how right anyone else might be.

dustywalker12 said:it’s unlikely things will get any better, because the people who actually had something worth saying have either been kicked out or just walked away on their own

Now, if that were actually true, I have to wonder... what does that say about you, considering you're still hanging around here? 🤔

Jack Harris3 said:If that claim actually held water, what does it say about you—the fact that you’re still hanging around here? 🤔

I honestly don't think any argument you make holds any weight. You can't just throw a claim out there and expect it to mean something; you actually have to process it and back it up if you want to reach a real conclusion.
Your processor is completely fried. It doesn't matter what you feed it; the result is always exactly the same garbage.

Cccc... 🙄
Maybe try learning how to actually respond to a question or a post with a bit of decorum , and then who knows, maybe the Politics board won't stay in such a coma... especially if others start following your lead. 🙂

Jack Harris3 said:Well, look... judging by all the comments about the inquisitor leaving, a lot of people actually feel the exact opposite of what you're saying regarding his impact.
And that crowd includes Mexicans and leftists too. 😁

Who exactly are these "many"?
Maybe just run a poll if you've got three honest people left, then we can see how those "many" stack up against everyone who thinks he was a total disaster.
As for the Mexicans, I guess any Mexican backing Royalist ideologies will support him, since the Nationalists and Royalists always went hand in hand anyway.

quietwolf said:Who exactly are these "many" people?
Go ahead and start a poll, if you think you have three solid votes... let's see how many of these "many" actually exist compared to those who think everything has been a total disaster.

I don't feel like it, and honestly, I don't really care. If it matters to you so much, just run the poll yourself. 🙂
I'm not interested in hyper-detailed stats out to eight decimal places... and all that won't change the fact that some people think the inquisitor's moderation is a complete train wreck, while others think he's doing a perfectly fine job.
And frankly, one word from one of his more low-profile critics carries more weight with me than three of your votes... since you can't even wrap your head around what he does, and in your eyes, he's already failed by default. 🙂

You seem like the perfect candidate to join that smart guy who yesterday started that thread demanding the inquisitor be replaced because of post deletions. 🤣
But the thing is, Inkvi hadn't even had the chance to delete anything for at least 24 hours by the time that thread was opened.

Should I go find that thread for you so you can sign the petition too? 😛

Jack Harris3 said:I don't feel like doing it, and I don't really care. If you're so interested, just start it yourself. 🙂
I have zero interest in seeing hyper-detailed numbers out to eight decimal places. It doesn't change the reality that some people think the inquisitor's moderation is a total disaster, while others think he’s doing a fine job.
Honestly, one word from someone who actually agrees with him carries more weight than three comments from you—someone who can't even wrap their head around his logic and assumes everything he does is wrong by default. 🙂

Maybe you should join that smart guy who yesterday opened the thread demanding the inquisitor be replaced because of post deletions. 🤣
But the truth is, the moment that thread went up, Inkvi hadn't even been active enough for 24 hours to have deleted anything.

Want me to reopen that thread so you can sign the petition too? 😛

"Some people" and "many people" aren't the same thing.

And yeah, you're right—someone who seriously claims they're a white supremacist and is proud of it obviously can't do anything right!

So, when are you finally going to grow some balls?

quietwolf said:Who exactly are these "many"?
Why don't you just run a poll? If you actually have three solid examples, we can compare those "many" against everyone else who thinks the whole thing was a total disaster.
As for support from Mexicans—well, anyone holding Royalist views will back him, since those groups have always been two sides of the same coin.

Exactly. Jack Harris3—your claim that the inquisitor would be supported by Mexicans, or non-Americans, or leftists, or anyone not aligned with the Nationalists—is both inaccurate and completely arbitrary. We all know that the Royalists actually share much more in common with that Nationalists inquisitor, the darling of the New York Times, and our "moderator."👎

Jack Harris3 said:Well, look... if you judge by the reaction to the inquisitor's departure, plenty of people see his impact quite differently than you do.
And that crowd includes everyone from Mexicans to the far left. 😁

I honestly think it’s perfectly fine for you to embrace being a conservative, a religious traditionalist—to hold the same views as Inkvi. Just don't try to mask it behind critiques of others, or hide behind this facade of "false equidistance," pretending to be some sort of neutral center when you aren't.

Istrian73 said:This place is turning into a total communist wasteland... just make quietwolf the moderator and let the party begin.

I gotta wonder... whose "reincarnation" are we actually looking at here?
With barely any posts under his belt, this guy acts like he’s already an expert with a mountain of concrete opinions.
And then, check out the avatar—some supposedly "important" historical figure from the old country.

A moderator’s job is to moderate. Their primary role isn't just deleting posts or handing out bans; it's about guidance. They should steer the conversation to ensure discussions stay on track and move in a productive direction.

Exactly. They should guide the topic objectively.
That said, some people wander off-topic themselves while criticizing others for doing the same. Personally, I don't mind if people chat, as long as they aren't picking fights with everyone else. Some can be quite rude and crude—and if we're strictly following the rules, they really ought to exercise more restraint.

Some moderators clearly know their stuff, whereas for others, I honestly can't tell why they were assigned to their specific subforum. *Nomina sunt odiosa*, as they say. But I suppose the higher-ups have their reasons.

As for how trivial some topics are... well, a lot of them are. That’s not necessarily a bad thing since this forum is meant for sharing information and opinions, but also for entertainment. Honestly, anyone who treats something like a backyard chicken coop as a matter of life and death is a total fruitcake. It's just nonsense.

Lastly, it's really nice that you've opened up this little moderator corner where half the story (and all the juicy gossip) is missing. 😁

Personally, I think anyone who talks trash behind someone's back instead of saying it to their face is just a complete coward. Sorry if that sounds blunt, but it's pretty much always the case.
😁

Exactly. It still bothers me that I can't just put a moderator on ignore when I'm browsing a different subforum.
😬
Yeah, yeah, I know that's never going to happen.☕

rustymaker60 said:True. It still bugs me that I can't just put a certain mod on ignore when I'm browsing a subforum where they don't actually moderate.
😬
Yeah, yeah, I know—that’s never going to happen. ☕

If you're that unhappy with how things work, why not just start your own forum?
I'm always thinking about how some frustrated loser who means absolutely nothing in the real world gets such a massive ego boost from telling everyone else what to do or how to think. It’s almost entertaining to watch; the more insignificant their opinions seem, the louder they feel the need to lecture everyone else.
Take a look at the line below for an example. 😁

dustywalker12 said:If this doesn't work for you, feel free to start your own forum.
I always find myself reflecting on how some frustrated individual—someone who doesn't amount to much in the real world—gets such a kick out of telling everyone else what to do or how to think. It’s actually quite entertaining to watch; the more insignificant their opinions seem, the more they love to lecture others.
Take a line as an example. 😁

Just a line. 😕 What is this? Who is this?

Why would I bother switching to a different forum just because one or two people get on my nerves out of several thousand users?
☕

rustymaker60 said:What line 😕 are you even talking about? Who are you referring to?

Why on earth would I bother jumping ship to another forum just because one or two people occasionally get on my nerves? Out of several thousand users?
☕

And what’s your plan then—you want them to ban everyone you personally don't like?
Just let those losers feel like they actually matter. Is that really such a hard concept for you to grasp?

I didn't want to go through the hassle of starting a whole new thread for no reason, but I was just wondering if anyone knows who deleted my posts over on the politics board

I I asked the exact same thing here—why on earth are we letting this guy just rip off articles from newspapers?—only to have my post nuked while this garbage stays up.

silverstag19 said:I didn't mean to start a whole new thread for no reason, I just want to know who wiped my posts from the Politics section.

Man, if you have the power to delete my stuff, you might as well tell me who you are. Honestly, I don't even care about the reason, and I definitely won't cause a scene.

silverstag19 said:I didn't just start a new thread for no reason, I just want to know who deleted my posts over in the politics section.

Look, I'm the one who nuked those two posts of yours in politics. They were either totally off-topic or just replies to some other off-topic garbage that got wiped.

btw.
You would've gotten an answer way sooner if you'd actually asked this on the KŽ politics board... I just stumbled onto your question by pure accident.

observer said:I deleted two of your posts in the Politics section because they were off-topic, or they were just replies to posts that had already been removed for being off-topic.

btw.
You would’ve gotten an answer sooner if you’d just posted your question in the KŽ section under Politics. I honestly just stumbled upon it by accident.

thanks, I was just curious, like I said before. Honestly, I expected these kinds of silly excuses anyway, so don't even bother next time.