#21 ·
dustypuma5 said:Not looking to argue about this. You got my stance, take it or leave it...
Who are "we"?
"We're the ones our parents warned us about..."
☕
And who are those people?
Started by Jessica Cox2 · · 👁 12 views · 61 replies
dustypuma5 said:Not looking to argue about this. You got my stance, take it or leave it...
Who are "we"?
"We're the ones our parents warned us about..."
☕
Jessica Cox2 said:I honestly have nothing to say... the only thing that bugs me is why they don't just come out and say: WE ARE A FORUM SPONSORED BY THE MOST JUST AND BEST PARTY, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, WHOSE OPPONENTS TO COMMUNISM AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE ACTUALLY AGAINST THE RULES. FEEL FREE TO MOCK THE REPUBLICANS AS MUCH AS YOU WANT AND AS LONG AS YOU CAN... WELCOME, YOUR DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
Jessica Cox2 said:Well, once she’s actually been convicted for it, you can say whatever you want... but until then, 🙂
Jessica Cox2 said:I honestly have nothing to say... the only thing that bugs me is why they don't just come out and say: WE ARE A FORUM SPONSORED BY THE MOST JUST AND BEST PARTY, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, WHOSE OPPONENTS TO COMMUNISM AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE ACTUALLY AGAINST THE RULES. FEEL FREE TO MOCK THE REPUBLICANS AS MUCH AS YOU WANT AND AS LONG AS YOU CAN... WELCOME, YOUR DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
David Foster80 said:What exactly is she going to be charged with? 😂
If it weren't so damn pathetic, it would actually be hilarious. 🤮
Yeah, it’s always the same story. The second you speak out against Jace, George W. Bush, or whatever other clique is running things over at the Republican Party, people immediately assume you're a die-hard Democrat. It's like there's no middle ground anymore.
🤦
God, even kids don't think like that.
David Foster80 said:What exactly is she going to be charged with? 😂
If it weren't so damn pathetic, it would actually be hilarious. 🤮
Yeah, it’s always the same story. The second you speak out against Jace, George W. Bush, or whatever other clique is running things over at the Republican Party, people immediately assume you're a die-hard Democrat. It's like there's no middle ground anymore.
🤦
God, even kids don't think like that.
William Green4 said:Dear Jessica Cox2! I feel personally insulted by Kamala Harris claiming her appointment as Prime Minister was entirely legitimate.
It feels like a slap in the face from George W. Bush too, especially after he went on record branding himself as the ultimate champion against corruption!
Then you have Davor Šuker, who insists that the nation's finances are perfectly under control, which just feels like a joke.
Even the flag-waving partisans offend me by insisting they are working solely for the common man!
To me, all of this feels like a direct affront to my intelligence, yet somehow, it seems as though no one will ever be held accountable for these contradictions.
Don't you agree?
Jessica Cox2 said:Even kids don't talk like this... at least they try to make an actual argument instead of just shouting names like "George W. Bush" and "Unknown"...
Jessica Cox2 said:But wait, didn't "Jadranka Kosor" actually take over the premiership legally??
And when exactly did George W. Bush say that??
Sure, the national finances are "under control"—right up until the moment we go bankrupt.
As for Eric Adams, he works for the little guy just as much as he works for the big shots.
If everything you listed were actually true, we'd be seeing early elections right now, and those people would have been held accountable... by being kicked out of their positions (Prime Minister, Cabinet members, etc.).

William Green4 said:Kamala Harris wasn't actually elected as Prime Minister, regardless of whatever claims people might be making to the contrary, because she simply wasn't.
The voters didn't cast their ballots based on her specific policy platform.
George W. Bush mentioned exactly that in the papers just yesterday.
Jessica Cox2 said:Hmm... that’s exactly what I was thinking... by "chaos," he means the fact that this is actually an INDEPENDENT forum... 😂😂😂
Jessica Cox2 said:But wait, didn't "Jadranka Kosor" actually take over the premiership legally??
And when exactly did George W. Bush say that??
Sure, the national finances are "under control"—right up until the moment we go bankrupt.
As for Eric Adams, he works for the little guy just as much as he works for the big shots.
If everything you listed were actually true, we'd be seeing early elections right now, and those people would have been held accountable... by being kicked out of their positions (Prime Minister, Cabinet members, etc.).
Jessica Cox2 said:Hey there!!
I’ve noticed that you guys allow people on this forum to go after American politicians like Kamala Harris, the former Prime Minister... George W. Bush, the former President... Al Gore, the former Secretary... Eric Adams, the Mayor of Washington, D.C.... and plenty of others. What kind of forum is this, where you only permit criticism against politicians who don't suit your personal tastes? Well, you are ultimately responsible for everything posted on this site. Besides, you're actually violating your own forum rules, which state that anything opposing the laws of the United States Government is strictly prohibited... and under the United States Government legal code, it says:
Article 199.
Anyone who insults another through the press, radio, television, in front of a group of people, at a public gathering, or by any other means that makes the insult accessible to a larger number of people,
shall be punished by a fine of up to sixty days' wages or imprisonment for up to six months.
and
Article 200.
Anyone who publishes or carries false information regarding another person that could damage their honor or reputation through the press, radio, television, in front of a group of people, at a public gathering, or by any other means that makes the libel accessible to a larger number of people,
shall be punished by a fine or imprisonment for up to one year.
So, go ahead—just ignore this thread and continue straight into violating both the laws of the United States Government and your own forum rules.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/
thanks
Jessica Cox2 said:Well, she can't be charged... and that’s precisely the problem. Can I just start a thread calling Zoran Milanović a partisan hack and an idiot? Sure, I can. But the thread will be deleted within ten minutes. And wait—are you trying to tell me this isn't the Democratic Party Forum??
Just look at three or four posts back... see what Ryan Vaughn7 wrote... he’s a moderator or something like that.
Jessica Cox2 said:But wait, didn't "Jadranka Kosor" actually take over the premiership legally??
And when exactly did George W. Bush say that??
Sure, the national finances are "under control"—right up until the moment we go bankrupt.
As for Eric Adams, he works for the little guy just as much as he works for the big shots.
If everything you listed were actually true, we'd be seeing early elections right now, and those people would have been held accountable... by being kicked out of their positions (Prime Minister, Cabinet members, etc.).
Jessica Cox2 said:I’ve got nothing left to say... this is just a Democratic Party rally, not some independent forum... 👎👎👎

Jessica Cox2 said:I’ve got nothing left to say... this is just a Democratic Party rally, not some independent forum... 👎👎👎
dustypuma5 said:Until they prove they aren't corrupt, calling them out is basically insulting every honest person out there.
They picked careers where being a crook is pretty much the default, so they actually have to work to prove they're decent. And honestly, they don't even care when people call them thieves. Looking at how this country is running, they’re either totally incompetent or just straight-up criminals.
I'm leaning toward the second one.
Because, I mean, it takes real talent to take a country with all its potential and turn it into such a poverty-stricken mess. Only real crooks could pull that off.
And insults are the least of it; in a normal country, these people would be considered traitors. A hundred years ago, they'd be facing a firing squad.
Also, it's all the same thing—Democratic Party, Republican Party, whatever...
It's been the same group of people running the show for the last 35 years. Honestly, nothing a proper de-communization wouldn't fix. Except, even the new recruits get filtered through those old systems of privilege and corruption—stepping on everyone else just to get ahead. If you don't have those "talents," you can't move up.
We shouldn't even bother insulting them; we should just kick them out, ban them from public life, and keep them away from the younger generation.
We've got people in power who barely know English, let alone a second language. People who can't even send an email or find a news site online (though they're great at hiding under desks in Congress), people who are illiterate, useless, and whose only skill in life is living off someone else. They don't know anything else.
Nowadays, you need English and computer skills for any job. The people running the country should probably know way more than some warehouse worker or retail clerk, right?
Instead, we have incompetents leading the competent, and crooks destroying businesses just so they can buy them for cheap—people willing to slaughter anything just to get their piece of the pie.
We're stuck with people for whom insults are the mildest form of criticism. The fact that they don't even flinch when they're insulted says everything. Their motto is basically: say what you want, I know what I'm doing.
And hey, lady, stop crying for their honor. Let the people vent their rage here at least. Though, I think we'll reach that point from a century ago pretty soon, where traitors were shot, because even stronger nations couldn't handle this many thieves. Just wait until people start losing their homes and apartments; then an insult on a forum will be the least of what happens to those parasites.
Signing off...
Jessica Cox2 said:I’ve got nothing left to say... this is just a Democratic Party rally, not some independent forum... 👎👎👎