coppernomad7 said:I’m not entirely sure if this is the right spot for my questions, but I couldn't find anything else that really fit the bill...
I’ve been wondering lately why some hospitals here in the States will just go ahead and give you anesthesia for certain procedures or exams, while other places—like the big medical center over in Seattle—won't even budge or talk about it. It feels pretty inconsistent if you ask me.
Is it because they’re short on anesthesiologists? Is it just that anesthesia costs an arm and a leg these days? Or maybe they actually think they're doing the patient a favor by skipping it? I don't know, could be something else entirely.
If money is the main issue here, is there any way I could just cover the cost of the anesthesia and the anesthesiologist myself? It still feels like it would be cheaper than trying to go fully private for everything.
Look, if the whole debate boils down to whether something is "good" or "bad" for me personally, shouldn't I, as a consenting adult, have the right to choose a specific risk over dealing with constant pain? I mean, I'm more than happy to sign a waiver and put that in writing for them.
I'm honestly so frustrated right now, and I have absolutely no clue how to fix this mess.😢
I had my colonoscopy back in December, and man, I practically had to beg them to let me have sedation. It ended up being pretty painful. They had a valid reason for pushing back on it, though—basically, if I don't give them honest feedback about the pain, they might end up perforating my bowel. So, yeah... definitely not exactly a walk in the park.
So, I'm gearing up for a different procedure now. It’s nothing nearly as intense as the last one, so the risks are way lower, but they're still being stubborn about the anesthesia. They won't budge on it. It's kind of frustrating because, in a lot of hospitals here in the States, if you specifically ask for general or even just local anesthesia, they usually just go along with it. But apparently, that's not how things work in this neck of the woods.
Alright, let’s demystify this whole thing. I’m currently in the middle of an IVF cycle, and I've got the egg retrieval—or follicle aspiration, if you want to get technical—coming up. This is my first time going through it, and honestly? I am absolutely terrified. It's gotten to the point where I'm questioning the entire process. I've been a total wreck for weeks now, and I’m genuinely scared that in the final few days leading up to it, I won't even be able to sleep because of the anxiety. I mean, seriously, do women going through something this delicate and physically demanding really need to deal with extra layers of stress and pain on top of everything else? We’re living in the 2000s, for crying out loud. Anesthesia isn't some experimental, avant-garde concept, thank God... yet somehow, things can still change so much.
I might have gone a little overboard here, but if anyone has ideas on how to actually handle this situation, I’d really appreciate the help. I was thinking about maybe hiring a private anesthesiologist to come meet me at the hospital on the day of my biopsy, but honestly, I have no clue if that’s even doable or where I’d even start looking to find out.
I was also hoping someone could clear something up for me—what does "local anesthesia" actually look like when you're talking about procedures involving internal organs?
If you ask me, for something like a colonoscopy or an egg retrieval, you really should only be looking at general anesthesia or maybe an epidural. I honestly don't get why I keep seeing places—even on the websites of reputable clinics like CITO over in Split—offering local anesthesia for egg retrievals. Can someone walk me through how that kind of local anesthesia actually works? Like, where exactly on the body is it applied?
Is there any kind of mild anesthetic available at pharmacies that won't trigger a massive interrogation about my medical history or previous tests? Honestly, if I can't track down actual anesthesia, what would you guys recommend as a "cocktail" to help me relax and take the edge off the pain? My plan was to take 10 mg of normabel and a Voltaren rapid about half an hour to an hour beforehand, but I'm not sure if that’s a smart move. Would something like Praxitan be better than the normabel, or maybe even Apaurin? I know they use that stuff for sedation, so I'm just wondering what the best bet is.
Hey, I'm here. What's going on? Just let me know what you need help with and we'll figure it out together.
Seriously, just insist on getting anesthesia. If you're dealing with the hospital in Seattle, it really makes you wonder who’s actually trying to dodge the job—is it the anesthesiologists or the OB-GYNs?
It honestly feels like OB-GYNs just refuse to do it for reasons I can't quite wrap my head around. Seriously though, don't let them off the hook—insist on getting anesthesia. If they try to brush you off, demand a specific reason why they're choosing not to provide it. For a procedure like this, I really can't see any legitimate excuse to skip out on anesthesia.
If you were looking for a private anesthesiologist, who would you actually bring in? Honestly, I wouldn't even consider it!
Getting anesthetics from a pharmacy? Not a chance!
For egg retrieval, they usually go with local anesthesia. I haven't personally been through those specific procedures, but typically they inject a local anesthetic right into the vaginal vault—basically where the needle passes through the vaginal wall—so that big needle poke doesn't hurt nearly as much. Gynecologists can handle this themselves without needing a full anesthesiologist on standby, so it’s definitely doable.
As for you taking any meds on your own before the procedure, I really wouldn't recommend that. Especially things like normabel or other anti-anxiety meds. You have to be upfront with your doctors about everything you take, otherwise, they might actually kick you off the program because you took something they didn't authorize.
Seriously though, don't be afraid to insist on anesthesia. It's your right as a patient. If there's a way to do something just as effectively but with less invasion, less pain, and fewer side effects, that's the route we should be taking. A patient has every right to refuse a procedure if a less painful alternative exists and the doctor chooses the rougher way instead. So, if they don't give you a solid, logical reason why they won't use anesthesia, keep pushing for it.
It's 2011; people shouldn't have to be in pain! They can take their "house policies" and shove them.
Best of luck! Please, just let us know how it goes and what they end up saying. Fingers crossed for you!