#981 ·
Look, spinal anesthesia is definitely the lower-risk route here, regardless of any other factors—it’s just the better choice, period.
But since there's even a slight chance they might not be able to pull off the spinal, we can't say the risk of a myocardial infarction isn't a factor. It really comes down to how massive the infarct actually was (whether we're talking STEMI or NSTEMI), what the current EF looks like, and if the UZV shows any localized wall motion issues. That said, the anesthesiologist is going to demand a cardiologist's sign-off on all this anyway, so you'll get your answer then.
But since there's even a slight chance they might not be able to pull off the spinal, we can't say the risk of a myocardial infarction isn't a factor. It really comes down to how massive the infarct actually was (whether we're talking STEMI or NSTEMI), what the current EF looks like, and if the UZV shows any localized wall motion issues. That said, the anesthesiologist is going to demand a cardiologist's sign-off on all this anyway, so you'll get your answer then.