dustyridge12
Active Member
87 messages
joined Feb 2003
Look, I’ve been thinking about this. Americans have tried to produce TV series about the history of rock 'n' roll multiple times, and it’s always the same story. But one thing is absolutely certain: no one has yet managed to film a movie or a series that captures the entire history of rock 'n' roll in a truly objective way. Even here in the States, we’ve seen various attempts to tackle this subject. You have Janjatovic who put together an encyclopedia of the entire regional rock scene, then Lukovic had that interesting book back in the day that leaned more toward the pop scene—what people used to call the "easy listening" stuff—and then there's Outsider (which, if you ask me, is a fantastic film), plus now we have this documentary. I follow all of it with genuine interest! I’m sure this latest documentary will be fascinating to watch, but it's clearly impossible to create a truly comprehensive document about that era—which, if you think about it, is actually a testament to how rich and multifaceted our rock scene really was. We often get into debates about its quality, arguing whether we were second in Europe, third in the world, or maybe even seventh—but honestly, I won't weigh in on that right now; at the end of the day, it isn't a competition. Whether we like it or not, all of us who grew up in this subculture are products of that scene, so it’s only natural that everyone has their own specific vision of how it should be filmed and presented.
To give you a better idea of my perspective, here is a note from my wife. She’s currently staying with my parents in El Paso, while I’m out here in Portugal, and she wrote to me: "Hey, I was watching Smogovac yesterday, seeing them head off to some concert by a classic rock band. It’s much clearer to me now why you turned out the way you did."