CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Up in the Air (2009)

Up in the Air (2009)

Started by brightscout63 · · 👁 7 views · 47 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants brightscout63Larry Cruz51northerntrucker2hollowharbor76Bradley Taylor24frozenlynx17Sandra Patel23Ronald Ramirez8Ronald Morales51AAlex Evans8Melissa EvansGrace White4Nathan Gomez8Richard Murphy8Michelle Flores40Angela Kern69wearyskipper3Lisa Alvarez4velveteagle772Daniel Fisher7Brenda Sanders46Gary PatelBetty Taylor26 …
Angela Kern69 Angela Kern69 Member
13 messages
joined Oct 2003
#21 ·
I am utterly disappointed. There is perhaps one redeeming moment in the entire film—that scene where the girls discuss what they look for in a guy during their youth versus when they've matured. Beyond that, it’s just pathetic. George Clooney delivers his usual performance, cycling through those two signature smiles—one sly, one charming—but I certainly don't see any heavy-hitting acting here worthy of an Oscar nomination. What I found most irritating, however, was the sheer lack of direction from the writers; it feels as though they had no idea what they were actually trying to achieve. Is it meant to be a romantic comedy, as the marketing suggests? It isn't particularly romantic, nor is it funny. A social drama? If so, it remains incredibly shallow and superficial. Had the movie simply slid toward a predictable happy ending, it might have passed for tolerable fluff, but once we hit that twist in Chicago—which felt entirely unearned from a screenwriting perspective and existed solely to shock the audience—the film completely loses its way.
wearyskipper3 wearyskipper3 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Apr 2010
#22 ·
This movie is fantastic. 👍 I can't stand the sight of George Clooney, but he absolutely nails this role!
Michelle Flores40 Michelle Flores40 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Feb 2009
#23 ·
Angela Kern69 said:I am utterly disappointed. There is perhaps one redeeming moment in the entire film—that scene where the girls discuss what they look for in a guy during their youth versus when they've matured. Beyond that, it’s just pathetic. George Clooney delivers his usual performance, cycling through those two signature smiles—one sly, one charming—but I certainly don't see any heavy-hitting acting here worthy of an Oscar nomination. What I found most irritating, however, was the sheer lack of direction from the writers; it feels as though they had no idea what they were actually trying to achieve. Is it meant to be a romantic comedy, as the marketing suggests? It isn't particularly romantic, nor is it funny. A social drama? If so, it remains incredibly shallow and superficial. Had the movie simply slid toward a predictable happy ending, it might have passed for tolerable fluff, but once we hit that twist in Chicago—which felt entirely unearned from a screenwriting perspective and existed solely to shock the audience—the film completely loses its way.

It didn't even surprise me, honestly. I recently caught the first episode of season six of House, and they resolve a romantic subplot using the exact same tired trope. It’s clearly become a screenwriter's "in."

PS: As for the film, my feelings align pretty closely with yours. Not a single element feels properly executed (which is why I actually prefer the American translation of the title 😁)
Lisa Alvarez4 Lisa Alvarez4 Member
14 messages
joined Apr 2008
#24 ·
This movie is definitely overrated, especially considering its Oscar nomination.
velveteagle772 velveteagle772 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2010
#25 ·
The movie is worth watching solely for George Clooney. Everything else feels like something we've seen a thousand times before.
I honestly think they went a bit overboard with the Oscar nominations for this one.
Daniel Fisher7 Daniel Fisher7 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2010
#26 ·
I find it absolutely mind-boggling that he’s even been nominated for eight Oscars 🤷 , and I can't help but wonder: what on earth is the criteria here?...

....It is quite frankly a story we have all seen millions upon millions of times before; you could easily compare it to any old-fashioned Hollywood romance if you wanted to.....

....The only logical conclusion my mind keeps jumping to is that George is using this particular film as some sort of elaborate, cinematic attempt to answer the age-old question of why he hasn't tied the knot just yet!?!?

....and then there is that IMDb rating of 8.0 😕
Angela Kern69 Angela Kern69 Member
13 messages
joined Oct 2003
#27 ·
Daniel Fisher7 said:I find it absolutely mind-boggling that he’s even been nominated for eight Oscars 🤷 , and I can't help but wonder: what on earth is the criteria here?...

....It is quite frankly a story we have all seen millions upon millions of times before; you could easily compare it to any old-fashioned Hollywood romance if you wanted to.....

....The only logical conclusion my mind keeps jumping to is that George is using this particular film as some sort of elaborate, cinematic attempt to answer the age-old question of why he hasn't tied the knot just yet!?!?

....and then there is that IMDb rating of 8.0 😕

To honestly feels like a much bigger shock to me than those Oscar nominations.
Brenda Sanders46 Brenda Sanders46 Member
17 messages
joined Oct 2007
#28 ·
Watched it last night with those Greek subtitles turned on... man, it totally ruined the whole vibe for me 😁
Gary Patel Gary Patel Active Member
74 messages
joined Jul 2022
#29 ·
Just finished watching it. Look, it’s definitely not the greatest movie I’ve ever seen—and it’s certainly not the film of the year—but it might actually be one of Clooney's better turns. To be honest, I’ve always been a bit lukewarm on him; his acting style just never quite clicked for me—but in this one, he was actually decent. I even found myself feeling for him by the end.
8/10
Betty Taylor26 Betty Taylor26 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Mar 2009
#30 ·
I watched it, but honestly, I wish I hadn't.
slyrider16 slyrider16 Active Member
60 messages
joined Mar 2006
#31 ·
Really hit the spot. Honestly, out of all the 'Oscar' contenders I've sat through lately, this one is definitely the highest quality. The directing and editing are just smooth... they flow perfectly with the scenes. It’s textbook stuff, really—just solid, expert craftsmanship. The acting across the board was great, and the chemistry between the characters felt totally natural. Script-wise, it feels grounded and serious; even the humor (which there's plenty of) feels real and life-like, rather than being forced like in those typical "pure comedies." Characterization is spot on too. Just one quick scene (with Clooney's character and his neighbor) says everything you need to know about him.

That script 'twist' was totally earned. Looking back, almost everything in the movie was pointing toward that exact outcome. If it had ended any other way, it would've been a worse film. Right at the end, the script gives Clooney's character one last chance to take the "feel-good" route, but once again, it doesn't. And that’s exactly why it’s better.

Solid 4 out of 5. It just lacks those transcendent moments that would push it from "expertly crafted" to my top tier. Plus, planes and airports? I'm a sucker for those. I was already leaning toward a positive rating just for that. Loved the opening credits, too... pretty cool.
northerntrucker2 northerntrucker2 Member
22 messages
joined Jun 2005
#32 ·
So, if you ask me, the real heavy lifter here was definitely Anna Kendrick. I mean, don't get me wrong, Clooney is predictably excellent—he always is—but honestly, that "standard greatness" felt a bit insufficient during the opening act. It wasn't until Anna actually stepped onto the screen that the movie finally found its footing, gaining this much-needed weight and momentum, in my opinion. What I find quite clever is how the film presents itself as being rather shallow at first glance; it sort of tricks you into thinking it’s a light romp, when in reality, it’s digging into some pretty deep themes regarding the subjective perception of what constitutes a "normal" versus an "abnormal" lifestyle, and that whole idea that you're essentially a god or just a beast depending on how isolated you are.

Anyway, those bird's-eye views of the cities are absolutely stunning for 🙏, and that opening sequence? Pure 🙏.
It's a really solid film. 😍
driftingmarlin4 driftingmarlin4 Member
14 messages
joined Feb 2007
#33 ·
I kind of like it. I mean, I guess I still think Reitman's Juno was way better. 👍

Even though everyone seems convinced that Clooney is finally going to snag an Oscar, I don't know, I have my doubts about that. Personally, I'd probably give it to Anna Kendrick instead. 👍

The music 😍
David Price5 David Price5 Regular
435 messages
joined Jul 2012
#34 ·
driftingmarlin4 said:I kind of like it. I mean, I guess I still think Reitman's Juno was way better. 👍

Even though everyone seems convinced that Clooney is finally going to snag an Oscar, I don't know, I have my doubts about that. Personally, I'd probably give it to Anna Kendrick instead. 👍

The music 😍

he won it for Syriana 😉
driftingmarlin4 driftingmarlin4 Member
14 messages
joined Feb 2007
#35 ·
David Price5 said:he won it for Syriana 😉

Wait, you mean for the lead role? 😁
David Price5 David Price5 Regular
435 messages
joined Jul 2012
#36 ·
It might be a side project, but an Oscar is still an Oscar! :-D
wearybison35 wearybison35 Member
11 messages
joined Feb 2010
#37 ·
It didn't totally blow my mind or anything, but I'd still give it a solid 8/10...👍

Clooney is looking good—not quite that "Oscar-bait" version of him, but still pretty decent—and Anna Kendrick was 😍 absolutely killer... honestly, I spent the first half of the movie pretty much hating her character, but then halfway through, my whole perspective just flipped completely...
Farmiga was alright, though she rubbed me the wrong way just a little bit, but she gets a pass...
Let’s be real here, without Clooney, this movie wouldn't even be in the conversation for an Oscar, yet it’s kind of ironic how someone else (Kendrick) basically snatched the spotlight right out from under him...
wanderingsurfer93 wanderingsurfer93 Newcomer
1 message
joined Feb 2010
#38 ·
If you ask me, there’s nothing particularly special here.🤷
restlessranger30 restlessranger30 Member
11 messages
joined Jul 2009
#39 ·
I honestly think we need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture here. It’s easy to get caught up in the immediate hype, but if you really analyze the trajectory of this situation, there’s a much deeper layer to unpack. We can't just brush over the nuances! kaže:
It didn't completely blow my mind, but I'd still give it a solid 8/10.👍

George Clooney is looking sharp here—not exactly dressed for an Oscar ceremony, but still looking great. And look at Anna Kendrick! 😍 Absolutely top-tier. I have to admit, I was actually pretty dismissive of her performance during the first half of the movie, but by the end, my opinion had completely flipped. It was a total 180!
Farmiga is fine, I guess. She was getting on my nerves a little bit, but she’ll do.
Let's be real here: without George Clooney, this movie wouldn't even be in the conversation for an Oscar. But there's a massive irony at play—it feels like someone else (Kendrick) completely hijacked the spotlight and stole the leading man status right out from under Clooney.

I’d give this one a thumbs up across the board. It might fall just short of an 8/10 for me, but honestly, given how incredible the soundtrack is, I can definitely live with that.
Kendrick is absolutely phenomenal! Thank God they didn't end up together! Seriously, if Clooney and her had actually tied the knot, it would have been such a massive disappointment. I can't even imagine how much that would have ruined everything for me.
Bryan Taylor9 Bryan Taylor9 Member
43 messages
joined Nov 2013
#40 ·
The movie is decent enough, but let’s be real—it’s got zero chance at an Oscar.
When you put it up against a masterpiece like Juno, this flick doesn't even come close.
The cast definitely put in the work, and if you ask me, those are the only nominations actually worth mentioning; everything else was just filler.
By the way, it looks like Reitman built Anna Kendrick's character based on his own wife... poor guy.🤣

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads